Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Airbus Wins India’s Tanker Rebid

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Airbus Wins India’s Tanker Rebid

Old 1st Nov 2012, 08:36
  #1 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,234
Received 1,502 Likes on 679 Posts
Airbus Wins India’s Tanker Rebid

Airbus Wins India’s Tanker Rebid


NEW DELHI — Airbus has been selected as the preferred vendor over Russia’s Ilyushin to supply six aerial tankers for the Indian Air Force in a $1 billion tender, according to Indian Defence Ministry officials.

After the commercial bids were opened earlier this month, the base price of the Russian Il-78 tanker was quoted as lower than that of the A330, but when factoring in maintenance and fuel costs, the Airbus was the better value, said a Defence Ministry official. The official refused to provide the exact quotes of the bids, and said the Russian government-owned company had not yet been officially informed about the decision. Russian diplomats confirmed they had not been informed of the Airbus selection.

Boeing withdrew from the competition in 2010, leaving only the A330 and Il-78 in competition. The tender in 2010 also was sent to EADS, Lockheed Martin and Antonov of Ukraine. Antonov did not qualify, and Lockheed and Boeing did not participate.

The Indian Air Force is using six Il-78 midair refuelers bought from Uzbekistan and plans to buy 12 additional tankers, which includes the six from Airbus. Defence Ministry sources said it is not yet decided if a fresh tender will be opened to buy the remaining six or if a repeat order will be given to the winner to the current competition.

The current tender is itself a rebid of a 2006 tender in which the A330 finished behind the Il-78 tanker, but the Indian Air Force preferred the European tanker. When the matter was sent to India’s Finance Ministry, it said the lowest bidder should be the winner. The controversy led to the cancellation of the tender. Defence Minister A.K. Antony wrote the Indian Parliament on Dec. 14, 2009, that the Finance Ministry had expressed reservations about the competition.

“The procurement proposal had been progressed in accordance with the Defence Procurement Procedure — 2006 and thereafter referred to the Ministry of Finance who has expressed certain reservations relating to the competitiveness of the bids and the reasonableness of the price,” Antony wrote.

The Indian Air Force plans to deploy the tankers at Panagarh Air Base in the eastern state of West Bengal to help increase the range of its Su-30MKI fighter jets, which would enable the Indian aircraft to penetrate deeply into China, an Air Force official said. In addition to lower fuel costs, the Airbus tanker is optimized for high-altitude cruise and fitted with advance avionics, the IAF official said.
ORAC is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2012, 08:57
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
given the time it takes India to finally decide on anything this thread will run until 2020
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2012, 10:03
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,268
Received 31 Likes on 23 Posts
By the way, India selected the CH-47 Chinook over the Mil-26 as well. So a win for Boeing on that one..
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2012, 11:15
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Exit stage right.
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The Indian Air Force plans to deploy the tankers at Panagarh Air Base in the eastern state of West Bengal to help increase the range of its Su-30MKI fighter jets, which would enable the Indian aircraft to penetrate deeply into China, an Air Force official said
Is it just me or is there something really stupid in saying this...........
racedo is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2012, 08:31
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no - a lot of people in the Indian Army & Air Force still want to refight the 1962 Border War

God knows why
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2012, 09:25
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or they want to be able to pose a credible threat to important places in China in order to prevent a repeat of 1962*... not an unreasonable concern, with the Chinese' current policy of pushing its neighbors over any territory which had ever been under Chinese control, and China's close ties with Pakistan.

If the 3rd (or is it the 4th... I've lost count) Indo-Pak war breaks out, India wants to be able to ensure that China stays out of the fighting.



* Remember, although India had built outposts in the disputed regions, and had been "pushing" the Chinese to "test their resolve", China initiated the major action in 1962.

Also, there were incidents as recent as 1987, and there are still territories where agreement has NOT been reached on just who owns the land.

Last edited by GreenKnight121; 3rd Nov 2012 at 09:27.
GreenKnight121 is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2012, 09:39
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TBF the Chinese have quite a long record of coming to a negotiated settlement on their boundaries without fighting - but it takes two to tango and the Indian position is that if it was on THEIR maps as Indian in 1948 then it is part of India and cannot legally be negotiated away

Those "boundaries" along the Himalayas are a nightmare - most of them were never surveyed properly at all
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2012, 10:50
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glasgow
Age: 61
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heathrow Harry,

most of them were never surveyed properly at all
That's right, blame the Surveyors for all the Indo/ Pak/ Sino border problems. Nothing to do with them all wanting a bit more power and territory.
hval is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2012, 09:04
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the problem is that there were NEVER any surveyors in a lot of the areas in dispute

the locals weren't into making maps and hold local allegiances - to monasteries, tribes etc

The maps used for many of the lines were put together from tales from a mixture of big-game hunters, traders and pilgrims traveling through some bloody dreadful country.

First thing to do is to send surveyors ( mix from both sides and some neutrals) to make a map that everyone can agree on

THEN the politicians sit down and agree where the boundary is

THEN you send the surveyors out again to demarcate it on the ground

something for that lot in Hermitage to get on with
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2012, 13:25
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Exit stage right.
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
First thing to do is to send surveyors ( mix from both sides and some neutrals) to make a map that everyone can agree on

THEN the politicians sit down and agree where the boundary is

THEN you send the surveyors out again to demarcate it on the ground

something for that lot in Hermitage to get on with
If its anything like the surveyor who once did a house survey on a property I was going to buy then War will start quickly.

A big subsidence crack was just some loose plaster, tree beside the house was unlikely to cause problem even though roots were already coming through garage floor etc etc.

As he was contracted by the bank I sent them a copy of one a a surveyor mate had done for a beer and a curry.

I was going to demolish property anyway and sell site but had never disclosed this to anyone.

Borders are always imprecise.
racedo is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2012, 15:21
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,475
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,101 Posts
Won't last, they're already looking at breaking one of BMI's 330's, it was only built in 2001

G-WWBD I believe
NutLoose is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2012, 17:33
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glasgow
Age: 61
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
racedo,

If its anything like the surveyor who once did a house survey on a property
These are real Surveyors, not building surveyors.
hval is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.