XZ587 at North Berwick
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Just west of the North Sea
Age: 69
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
XZ587 at North Berwick
Exercise with RNLI on Sunday 12th Feb at North Berwick just up the coast from Boulmer - a snap for the scrapbook. Always a delight to see you folks up close.
XZ587 North Berwick
XZ587 North Berwick
Am not a spotter by any means, but was quite shocked to see this.
Sea Kings and RAF aircraft in general used to be spick and span as they say, in my 27 yrs service.
What other corners are being cut?
Oh i forgot we already know.
Sea Kings and RAF aircraft in general used to be spick and span as they say, in my 27 yrs service.
What other corners are being cut?
Oh i forgot we already know.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SW England
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's just a bit of exhaust soot! The fact she's serviceable and on task is the most important factor.
Isn't there an old army saying that no combat ready unit would pass a kit inspection? Of course SAR isn't combat (although I am informed it is just as demanding) but you get my drift.
Isn't there an old army saying that no combat ready unit would pass a kit inspection? Of course SAR isn't combat (although I am informed it is just as demanding) but you get my drift.
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Torquay, England
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's just a bit of exhaust soot! The fact she's serviceable and on task is the most important factor.
Professional pride springs to mind as well as the thought that if it looks that dirty on the outside, what's it look like on the inside? I'm sure the aircraft is well maintained and in first class working order but that 'soot' is all about image and public perception.
To me when I see it I just think about what else in that unit looks like that.
Apologies if my post appears harsh or too critical but how long would it take to clean off that filth?
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NOTTINGHAM
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
how long would it take to clean off that filth?
Get a life (all of you washer women), for God's sake!
Foldie
"Professional pride springs to mind as well as the thought that if it looks that dirty on the outside, what's it look like on the inside? I'm sure the aircraft is well maintained and in first class working order but that 'soot' is all about image and public perception."
LOL! - Don't you just love people who think everything is made better by a wipe with a soapy cloth? Typical BullSh!t.
The insides were (are) always heaped with stuff crammed into bags and jammed into corners.
Order? - Yes. Tidy? - Never! Professional? - Absolutely.
LOL! - Don't you just love people who think everything is made better by a wipe with a soapy cloth? Typical BullSh!t.
The insides were (are) always heaped with stuff crammed into bags and jammed into corners.
Order? - Yes. Tidy? - Never! Professional? - Absolutely.
From my SAR days many years ago, I remember that the aircraft were given a fresh water wash at the end of the day if they had been flying over the sea and a foam wash on a scheduled basis (once a fortnight?).
After the foam wash the aircraft were treated with PX24 (same as WD40). That's why the soot sticks to the fuselage.
I can't imagine anything changing with that regime. Professional pride has kept them flying in relatively good condition considering the environment they operate in.
After the foam wash the aircraft were treated with PX24 (same as WD40). That's why the soot sticks to the fuselage.
I can't imagine anything changing with that regime. Professional pride has kept them flying in relatively good condition considering the environment they operate in.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: In England
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I blame the MoD for too much cost cutting and buying that cheap stock of sooty avgas from the Iranians!
Aircraft wash regime was and is rigourous. Anti-corrosion measures ultra important on any SAR flight with proximity to sea and saline atmosphere. One reason why 587 still going strong after 35 years... Aircraft number 3 (Mk3) off the Line in '77. ..and yes that pic of 540 (1st Mk3A) is it's 1st flight at Yeovil ('95 me thinks -Tuc will correct me!)
Other Spotters will wish to know that sooty Gnome exhausts have always been an issue... Sometimes causing undesirable results as in this pic within less than an hour's flight. Same spotters will also wish to know it's why the winch housing colour was changed from yellow to black to hide said effect. Study was done some years ago as to whether SK rear crew could suffer from too much soot inhalation... Not sure what happened to that study.. Probably buried in an MoD cabinet below the file on effects of depleted uranium shell exposure...
Aircraft wash regime was and is rigourous. Anti-corrosion measures ultra important on any SAR flight with proximity to sea and saline atmosphere. One reason why 587 still going strong after 35 years... Aircraft number 3 (Mk3) off the Line in '77. ..and yes that pic of 540 (1st Mk3A) is it's 1st flight at Yeovil ('95 me thinks -Tuc will correct me!)
Other Spotters will wish to know that sooty Gnome exhausts have always been an issue... Sometimes causing undesirable results as in this pic within less than an hour's flight. Same spotters will also wish to know it's why the winch housing colour was changed from yellow to black to hide said effect. Study was done some years ago as to whether SK rear crew could suffer from too much soot inhalation... Not sure what happened to that study.. Probably buried in an MoD cabinet below the file on effects of depleted uranium shell exposure...
Avoid imitations
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 426 Likes
on
225 Posts
It's the pilot's fault for taking off with the choke still full out.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Just west of the North Sea
Age: 69
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm feeling a bit guilty now for posting this pic. OK she's a tad sooty downwind of the exhaust, but my first thoughts on seeing the cab coming in was: 12:30z on a Sunday... probably been tasked earlier and no time for a quick wash and brush before heading out again.
No photos, but I can confirm that the crewman/winchman in back took time to brush any sand from his and others feet off the floor and out of the door before lifting from the beach. Most civvies like myself (I hope), appreciate that these are pretty hard working aircraft and aren't ornaments that have to look their best at all times.
No photos, but I can confirm that the crewman/winchman in back took time to brush any sand from his and others feet off the floor and out of the door before lifting from the beach. Most civvies like myself (I hope), appreciate that these are pretty hard working aircraft and aren't ornaments that have to look their best at all times.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Picture somewhere...
Study was done some years ago as to whether SK rear crew could suffer from too much soot inhalation... Not sure what happened to that study..
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Torquay, England
Posts: 838
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't worry about it coffin its just the usual pprune whiners with nothing better to do with their sad and pathetic lives. That's you glojo.
John
Tallsar
Quite right about pic.
Major problem in cost/serviceability/availability terms was alarming corona discharge caused by ingestion into radar Tx/Rx, which sat next to intake vent and blew efflux straight though the cooling fan/filter into the magnetron and its HT cables. The MoD tried to claim recompense against the radar manufacturers (MEL) for alleged unreliability, who gleefully pointed out that the whole point of a Radio Installation Memorandum (RIM) was to use it as the basic rules for aircraft installation design. Follow it, and you don't have the problem. Now fit the thing as per the book. (It didn't help that some of the specs didn't call for over-water ops, so the kit wasn't resistant to salt water - bit of a howler that).
MoD (AMSO at the time - Does anyone else notice they keep cropping up?) declined. And to make sure the root problem was hidden, they cancelled the need for RIMs, which in turn led to even more problems as increasingly systems were not integrated properly. (e.g. See Tornado/Patriot BoI).
Interesting how quickly one can establish links between manky aircraft and accidents.
Quite right about pic.
Major problem in cost/serviceability/availability terms was alarming corona discharge caused by ingestion into radar Tx/Rx, which sat next to intake vent and blew efflux straight though the cooling fan/filter into the magnetron and its HT cables. The MoD tried to claim recompense against the radar manufacturers (MEL) for alleged unreliability, who gleefully pointed out that the whole point of a Radio Installation Memorandum (RIM) was to use it as the basic rules for aircraft installation design. Follow it, and you don't have the problem. Now fit the thing as per the book. (It didn't help that some of the specs didn't call for over-water ops, so the kit wasn't resistant to salt water - bit of a howler that).
MoD (AMSO at the time - Does anyone else notice they keep cropping up?) declined. And to make sure the root problem was hidden, they cancelled the need for RIMs, which in turn led to even more problems as increasingly systems were not integrated properly. (e.g. See Tornado/Patriot BoI).
Interesting how quickly one can establish links between manky aircraft and accidents.