Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Russian subs stalk Trident

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Russian subs stalk Trident

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Aug 2010, 15:24
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
...their Trident D4 missiles
Were the D-5s traded in as a cost-saving measure?

I/C
Ian Corrigible is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2010, 16:10
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 45 yards from a tropical beach
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of all the tasks in the RAF and RN, ASW is the one that requires the most training, crew co-ordination and current practice. If the decision to double our ASW capability were taken today, it would take years for the new crews to achieve an appropriate level of expertise.
Ivan is certainly "avin' a laugh."
Neptunus Rex is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2010, 16:13
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SALISBURY
Age: 76
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Shack37/ Pingdit

OK, I'll have a guess.........Findhorn Bay?
Well if the nucs had been based in Inverness then that could well have been true.

Pingdit

Pigs bar rarely closed I seem to remember
Obviously if you can remember then you obviously weren't there!
fincastle84 is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2010, 19:06
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reminds me of the Op started when a recently downbanded port beam operator called a "certsub" not a million miles from said naval base...

Oh how we laughed as the greens rolled in.
The Old Fat One is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2010, 19:12
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: London Village
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of all the tasks in the RAF and RN, ASW is the one that requires the most training, crew co-ordination and current practice
Is it Really ?!
Redcarpet is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2010, 20:39
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,063
Received 180 Likes on 66 Posts
Of all the tasks in the RAF and RN, ASW is the one that requires the most training, crew co-ordination and current practice.
You'll have no difficulty converting to SH in the next 18 months then......
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2010, 20:51
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MPA to SH has been done quite a few times, however not many have managed the reverse............................
Ivan Rogov is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2010, 21:02
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,063
Received 180 Likes on 66 Posts
however not many have managed the reverse
Who would want to?

Pies in the oven, FLgodknows, fly around in circles. No wonder not many people have managed it, not many have ever been bothered.
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2010, 21:02
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: St Annes
Age: 68
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
f all the tasks in the RAF and RN, ASW is the one that requires the most training, crew co-ordination and current practice
Is it Really ?!
I suspect it is, actually, not least because it requires people to find extremely quiet things under the water where most non-acoustic sensors can't reach. This isn't intended to minimise the other roles required of sea and airborne units, but ASW is very difficult indeed to do properly, and the difference between good enough* and not good enough is paper thin.

Dave

*apologies to Boggy if he's reading this, I didn't mean him <g>
davejb is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2010, 21:03
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GC wrote:

Get rid of trident and problem solved!?!?!?
And he's closer than he may realise. Trident replacement requires SSBN build capability at Barrow - but we could buy SSNs from somewhere else (in Connecticut, possibly). So the cost of Trident should logically include a significant portion of the cost overruns on Astute that were all about buying the capability to build nuclear submarines rather than Astute herself. If SSBN is binned, then the need to have Barrow is binned too - making further savings possible.

The good news if this were to happen is that we'll be looking for a large number of certified nuclear engineers shortly for the next gen civil nuclear powerplants. Birds, stones.

S41
Squirrel 41 is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2010, 21:16
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Big (re)learning curve to regain ASW proficiency for the MR2 crews on return from GW1, after only a 2 month det. I feel sorry for the folks that are still around that may or may not be asked to re-invent the wheel from scratch. What a sad state of affairs for an island nation to be in.
changeitnot is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2010, 21:29
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: A Gaelic Country
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Russian sub stalks Trident.....

Ba**s!
covec is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2010, 21:31
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Black Prince

There was a Victor III skipper who back in the 80's was known as the Black Prince.

Couldn't help thinking that this Akula driver could be the "son of"

Are the AGI's still going about?
subs57 is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2010, 22:23
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,339
Received 61 Likes on 44 Posts
Quote:
Of all the tasks in the RAF and RN, ASW is the one that requires the most training, crew co-ordination and current practice.
You'll have no difficulty converting to SH in the next 18 months then......

Six four, thirteen and three quarters, clear above and behind."

Worked for me for 2 tours!

CG
charliegolf is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2010, 23:47
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,063
Received 180 Likes on 66 Posts
Six four, thirteen and three quarters, clear above and behind."

Worked for me for 2 tours!
Must have been on Belvederes or something because I've got no idea what six four, thirteen and three quarters means.
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2010, 06:38
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Odiham
Age: 56
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MGD

Who would want to?

Pies in the oven, FLgodknows, fly around in circles. No wonder not many people have managed it, not many have ever been bothered
I'm going back MGD does that count?
rockiesqiud is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2010, 07:22
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm going back MGD does that count?
There is nothing to go back to. Though perhaps Nimrod 2000, a token fleet of just 4 airframes may pop up sometime around 2015.

Must have been on Belvederes or something because I've got no idea what six four, thirteen and three quarters means.
Not exactly Belvederes, nor IIRC a correct set of fiqures. In those days it would have been 12.25 without SLF (Normal Ops) and 15ish when "Heavy". (A rare occasion) Though in fairness, CG may be referring to metal rather then GRP in which case he is probably spot on.

...as for remuster to ISK Has anyone ever applied? Nearest I know of is Tom moving in permanently to the RCC, and thats only because he is a local.
Tiger_mate is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2010, 07:29
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,339
Received 61 Likes on 44 Posts
TM

Never said it was correct, just that it got me by! (And it was a wee while back).
charliegolf is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2010, 08:38
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Middle England
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
F 84 said:

Code:
I well remember one panic when it got so busy that  we finished up with the whole of 42 detached to ISK to give assistance.
Suspect that was the time I had to seek the permission of the PMC to leave the table half-way through the Main Course.
I was still conducting briefings in Mess Kit at lunchtime the following day!

S206
Sempre 206 is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2010, 10:26
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SALISBURY
Age: 76
Posts: 706
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was still conducting briefings in Mess Kit at lunchtime the following day!

S206
That's the one! There was also a JMC taking place although the Nimrod involvement was somewhat reduced! Bogh flew back with my crew & we did a formation arrival back at St Mawgan c/s Chough formation!
Maybe if the Mk 4 eventually gets into service they'll let some of us OAPs have a go.
fincastle84 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.