Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Airbus chief looks to cancel A400M unless Governments cough-up

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Airbus chief looks to cancel A400M unless Governments cough-up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Jan 2010, 16:14
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Toulouse area, France
Age: 93
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airbus Mil

I have a feeling that creating "Airbus Military" was one of the measures adopted when the "new team" took over from what Mr. F had left behind when he was ousted. CASA (as was) may well have been hopelessly overwhelmed by the A400M's requirements, having until then dealt only with much smaller cargo aircraft. Getting that end sorted would result in some (but not that much) delay to the programme, but the big killer was surely within Europrop. Whatever the reasons (and my ideas are as much supposition as anyone else's), it was surely Mr. Enders' and Mr. Gallois' job, under Stock Exchange rulings, to make sure that the danger to EADS/Airbus viability of going on or cancelling was openly aired.
Any support for the programme would surely amount to about 1 3/4 bn Euros per partner, more or less according to numbers on order. The A400M problem's not one of your "threatened" banks - and look how much they got without a governmental squeak (said somewhat in jest).

It seems to be flying quite nicely, though (which didn't save TSR2 ...)
Jig Peter is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2010, 16:36
  #22 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bourton-on-the-Water
Posts: 1,017
Received 16 Likes on 7 Posts
Despite a slightly questionable headline
The €20bn plane that may not fly
Sarah Arnott's piece in the London Indy's Business Section is a reasonable tour de l'horizon for non experts. (Like me)
The €20bn plane that may not fly - Business Analysis & Features, Business - The Independent

airsound
airsound is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2010, 19:35
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Much-Binding-in-the-Marsh
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So Nearly Time for Plan B Then

And Plan B ain't all that bad so long as we actually get the right balance of Albert J and C17. Indeed, many have been advocating this as a more sensible option in any case. It seems pretty clear to me that operating 2 fleets is going to be more cost effective than operating 3! So roll on the end of the month and a firm decision rather than one of those rather wonderful Sir Humphrey moments 'The Minister has decided not to decide ... and that's his final decision on the matter'.
Impiger is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2010, 20:22
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Forest of Caledon
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"They signed a stupid contract and all the current management readily admit it was a stupid contract."
That says it all.
Low Flier is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 12:55
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Contract Management

As far as I can see, the only way European tax payers can avoid getting ripped off is to pay cash on delivery for existing products - with no specification changes. How that can be squared with a European aircraft industry continuing to exist is beyond me.
911slf is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2010, 14:34
  #26 (permalink)  
SVK
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Somewhere......
Posts: 135
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Mr Impiger,

By strange coincidence I have been watching my 'Yes Prime Minister' DVD this very morning! (One of my better Xmas presents this year) How I am laughing at the issues affecting Jim Hacker's Government:

Should the Prime Minister buy Trident?
Where did the sudden Economic Financial Crisis come from? Why didn't the Treasury see it coming?
Should we send an Airborne Brigade to St George's Island on a 'goodwill' visit to counter the threat from Yemen?


You couldn't make it up. No wait - they did!



SVK


- Apologies for the Thread Drift...
SVK is offline  
Old 24th Feb 2017, 14:07
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,150
Received 101 Likes on 54 Posts
A400M blamed for Airbus drop in profits 63%

https://aviationvoice.com/airbus-ann...-201702231051/
chopper2004 is online now  
Old 21st Feb 2019, 13:18
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under a recently defunct flight path.
Age: 77
Posts: 1,375
Received 21 Likes on 13 Posts
Airbus to conclude A400M contract revisions in months

In an article on Flight Global:-

Airbus expects to conclude contract revisions with A400M customers “in the coming months”, and says it “completed significant de-risking” of the military transport programme during 2018.
Speaking at the European group’s annual results presentation in Toulouse, outgoing chief executive Tom Enders said Airbus has “succeeded in re-baselining the programme with our government customers”.
Lyneham Lad is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2019, 16:12
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aah... The Homer Simpson car of the Military air transport world.
VinRouge is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2019, 04:14
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,408
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by VinRouge
Aah... The Homer Simpson car of the Military air transport world.
I'm sorry, I really do try to restrain myself from blatant Airbus bashing (I have a pretty obvious prejudice).
But that line made me literally laugh out loud - enough so that my wife asked me what I was laughing at
tdracer is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2019, 05:33
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,907
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Is there any hope to see civilian use for the technologies developed in this program ?
An ATR-42 NEO with two of those bad ass engines might be interesting...
atakacs is offline  
Old 22nd Feb 2019, 05:41
  #32 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,399
Received 1,589 Likes on 726 Posts
https://www.airbus.com/newsroom/pres...ling-unit.html

Airbus certifies A400M Cargo Hold Tanks refueling unit


ORAC is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.