Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Meteor Accidents - 1953

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Meteor Accidents - 1953

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Feb 2014, 10:47
  #101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Plymouth
Age: 59
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Clifford, wonder what part of the family you are? - are you to do with Jim, Tom Coulston's brother? Roger ended up in Devon, at Totnes, where his parents ran a boys' home called Critchel Hostel (now demolished). You obviously know a lot about him, but maybe you need to know more? Will try and contact you through this website. Be assured, we care very much about Roger and have been trying to find out as much as possible for many years. This new internet interest has re-opened it all, and we are very pleased. Return to other sites you have visited and you will dig up more info. pictures, etc., Hope we will see you one day.
Actually is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2014, 10:57
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Plymouth
Age: 59
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear Warmtoast, please look through your b&w pictures of Meteors at Biggin, and see if you have WA855? Would love a copy!
Actually is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2014, 21:25
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ross-on-Wye
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Meteor

Hi Pruners ... I've posted on the subject elsewhere, but I'm asking if any guys/gals on here were present on the night of February 12th 1954 when 209 AFS at Weston Zoyland lost four Meteors with two pilots killed when they were diverted to Merryfield due to fog at WZ.

I was flying a Mk7 that night and was held overhead at 20,000 feet while the blocked runway was being cleared. I eventually managed to force land on the airfield grass alongside the runways goosenecks.

A couple of years ago I wrote a piece for the LOOP aviation newspaper entitled ... "The Night it Rained Meteors." I've now been asked to do a further article on the subject and would welcome hearing from any personnel who were on duty or flying that night ... ATC, ground engineers, pilots etc. Reply here or e-mail: [email protected]. Many thanks for any information. DRK.
Dennis Kenyon is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2014, 21:37
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't know if this is myth but I believe that more pilots were killed doing asymmetric practice in the meatbox than were killed during actual single engine failures. Those stats seem unbelievable now. I seem to remember the RAF lost something like 850 Meteors and 350 pilots flying them.

Was the Meatbox that bad an aircraft or were flying standards a lot poorer?
thing is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2014, 22:14
  #105 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South of the M4
Posts: 1,638
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts
Actually

Dear Warmtoast, please look through your b&w pictures of Meteors at Biggin, and see if you have WA855? Would love a copy!
No WA855 - sorry.

WT
Warmtoast is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2014, 23:39
  #106 (permalink)  
Danny42C
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
thing,

I believe what you heard about the Meteor 7 was true - I heard the same story, going through the Conversion at 203 AFS, Driffield, in early '50.

But, the (incredible) practice at first was to do asymmetric training with one flamed out (so you'd "burned your boats", if the approach went wrong there was no way out or back - and no "bang" seat either).

In the version told to me, it was an AM statistician who first noticed that that the accident rate from this practice exceeded the failiure rate of Derwent engines. When this became known, sanity returned; (thankfully, by the time I came along) practices were done with an idling engine - and that was bad enough !

A contributory factor in the carnage was that the "new boys" had been trained on Oxfords on their previous SFTSs before they came to AFS. They weren't given a fair crack of the whip. (This continued to '53 to my knowledge).

We "old men" were much better off (I'd flown Harvard, Hurricane, Spitfire and P47 -Thunderbolt, beside my Vengeance dive-bomber) - and it wasn't easy for me.

My opinion (on very little experience): the Meteor was a pussycat on two or one above 200 kts - much below that (particularly on one) it was all kinds of bitch. The Vampire was a pussycat - always.

IMHO, there's the major cause of the training accident rate in those years.

Danny.

"The past is a foreign country - they do things differently there"

Last edited by Danny42C; 20th Feb 2014 at 23:45. Reason: Afterthought.
 
Old 20th Feb 2014, 23:51
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As you say Danny, the past is a different country. My uncle was killed in a training accident in an Albemarle. Apparently there was a 'dead man's spot' on take off where if you lost a donk basically you bought it. Which is exactly what happened to him. I heard the Beaufort was a bit of a pig on one donk as well.
thing is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 09:44
  #108 (permalink)  

Do a Hover - it avoids G
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chichester West Sussex UK
Age: 91
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thing

What you are talking about with your uncle is the airspeed gap (in those days) between normal unstick speed and the higher speed at which full power on one engine and nothing on the other could be controlled by full rudder and a bit of aileron (this speed was often called single engined safety speed now V min control air - Vmca - with today's certification paperwork).

I believe with some WWII types it could be as long as 30 secs before this extra speed could be built up. The only solution with such types was to immediatley shut the good throttle and glide in straiight ahead. Any delay and it was likely the aircraft would roll uncontrollably into the ground.

Today airliners have a Vmcs that is below unstick speed (you will be pleased to know)
John Farley is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 09:51
  #109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Plymouth
Age: 59
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for looking, Warmtoast, much appreciated.
Actually is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 13:30
  #110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Meteors & pressurisation .... or lack thereof

A chum of mine in the USMC served on exchange at RAF Horsham St Faiths then RAF Coltishall. We had a useful Station Flight where we could get extra flying on aircraft ranging from an Anson to a Meteor NF-14.

My chum wrote yesterday in response to this Pprune Meteor reminiscence blog

I remember well the Meteor 7 and 8…I liked the climb and turn in them! The 7 was prehistoric with no pressurization! They were both fun to fly and had good climb rate…
In those early days I checked into the 2nd Marine Aircraft Wing at Cherry Point, NC in 1957 as a 2nd Lt right out of flight school…In 1956 they’d lost 80 aircraft but I forget how many pilots…All the US air forces must have lost close to 1,000 between them that year! SF
This raises an interesting question:what other types of jet aircraft did the RAF have in service that had NO pressurisation?


bigglesbrother is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2014, 14:47
  #111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What you are talking about with your uncle is the airspeed gap (in those days) between normal unstick speed and the higher speed at which full power on one engine and nothing on the other could be controlled by full rudder and a bit of aileron (this speed was often called single engined safety speed now V min control air - Vmca - with today's certification paperwork).
Thanks John. I'm not MEP qualified but talking to some of the guys that are at the club I was surprised to find that a lot of WWII era twins (even the Mosquito) had quite a gap between unstick and Vmca. Mu uncle's crash was as you described, lost an engine at around 100' on take off and it just rolled onto it's side and went in. Probably by the time he had figured out what had happened and throttled back on the live engine it was too late.
thing is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2015, 18:45
  #112 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Salisbury UK
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Research into the poor safety record of Meteors

New boy here - having spent much time idling over this forum and reading about experiences etc it strikes me this would make a decent documentary programme for TV.

Does anyone know if this has ever been spoken about or suggested previously ?

I am about to start reading Nick Carter's "Meteor Eject!" with a view to creating a slideshow/filmshow for my local air cadets (my daughter is a cadet) and at this early stage I will do well to keep it below an hour with all your fantastic anecdotes.

My personal history ? I was an Armourer at Brawdy 78-82 and worked on Mr Catt's Meteor and marvelled at the simplicity of a primitive Martin Baker seat - and by the sounds of it some of you would have been very grateful for one in the early Meteors !

I have some contacts in the TV world so will try my luck at pitching a documentary of sorts.

This one stat should surely get them interested:

"1953 was a bad year, 486 aircraft lost with 334 fatalities" - from earlier in the thread.

Thank you for sharing these amazing stories.
meteorian is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2015, 00:44
  #113 (permalink)  
Danny42C
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
meteorian,

Welcome aboard ! If you want some really good old tales, try "Gaining a RAF Pilots Brevet in WWII" on this page at the moment.

Your: "and by the sounds of it some of you would have been very grateful for one in the early Meteors !" Too true ! (particularly in the T7, with that side-opening canopy with the "Georgian windows").

D.

Last edited by Danny42C; 3rd Mar 2015 at 00:45. Reason: Typo.
 
Old 3rd Mar 2015, 08:31
  #114 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
unpressurised jets - JP Mks 3 & 4!
Wander00 is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2015, 08:56
  #115 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,385
Received 1,583 Likes on 720 Posts
Does anyone know if this has ever been spoken about or suggested previously ?
Amazon authors page.
Colin Cummings Colin Cummings
ORAC is offline  
Old 3rd Mar 2015, 21:11
  #116 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Marlow
Age: 76
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I do have some photos of a Meteor formation team in the 53/54 period. My father was a pilot and instructor at Middleton and also flew in this formation team. I'll try and copy the photos to this website
Dave Morton
5aday is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2015, 05:47
  #117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re the structural failures in the Meteor, I was once told that it all went back to a particular sortie at the OCU.

This was in days before fatigue meters were in use. Apparently one sortie involved winding the aircraft up as fast as you could at a couple of thousand feet then just sticking it on it's ear and pulling as hard as you could. Most 'g' meters simply stopped at @6g so didn't show the g being pulled in the manoeuvre, when fatigue meters became more common it was found that it was not uncommon for 10g to be recorded. If pilots were still doing this on the Sqns, then airframes became severely overstressed without any monitoring.

I've no personal knowledge of this but the story was told to me by an old Meteor driver when I was checking out on the T7.
Firestreak is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2015, 08:03
  #118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oxon
Age: 92
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I last flew a Meteor in 1969, but had continuously driven them since AFS in 1951. As I often checked guys out on the beast, in later years I would point out my personal max speed of 400kts, not the 520kts described in Pilot's Notes. My limit was because of the frightening creaks and groans the beast could make when doing anything out of the ordinary e.g. in that quiet moment at the top of a stall turn with the throttles closed and the aircraft yawing. And there seemed to be no requirement to go particularly fast! (I seem to remember that 455 was the Vampire limit). .
26er is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2015, 09:21
  #119 (permalink)  

Evertonian
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: #3117# Ppruner of the Year Nominee 2005
Posts: 12,485
Received 101 Likes on 58 Posts
On a side note, and totally off topic, can I just say it was a pleasure to watch the Meteor flying on the weekend. I'd never seen one doing its stuff live before...

Sorry, carry on!
Buster Hyman is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2015, 09:36
  #120 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Just over the road from Bicester airfield
Age: 80
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Intakes ?

Notice Meteors can have 2 different size intake "orifices" I had it explained that the small diameter intakes were for low level operations etc (PR ?) and the large diameter intakes were for general use and high altitude can anyone confirm ? and how did it affect the aircraft`s handling and performance on the different intakes, also did squadrons hold both types for different sorties ?, PH.
zetec2 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.