L-39 Crashes at Florida Airshow
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
Thread Starter
L-39 Crashes at Florida Airshow
The pilot of an Aero L-39 Albatros jet was killed when the plane crashed this afternoon at the Tico Warbird Airshow in Titusville, Florida. The press are reporting that he was an attorney from Gainesville, Florida, and early coverage appears to show the plane hitting the ground at the bottom of a loop.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California U.S.
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Still Another Airshow Mishap
Crashes & mishaps at both civilian and military airshows seem routine.
However, airshows are so popular that poor safety records don't diminish their scheduling.
The statistical probability is high that this L-39 crash was pilot error.
Even the military professionals have a hard time with airshows -- witness the USAF ThunderBirds September 2003 F-16 crash during an attempted loop {...pilot confused MSL and AGL altitudes}. Remember the Italian team's mishap at Ramstein AB Germany in the late 80's.
Wonder what the overall historical mishap rate is per actual 'airshow' hours flown worldwide ? Very high, IMO ... but those stats are not calculated anywhere.
However, airshows are so popular that poor safety records don't diminish their scheduling.
The statistical probability is high that this L-39 crash was pilot error.
Even the military professionals have a hard time with airshows -- witness the USAF ThunderBirds September 2003 F-16 crash during an attempted loop {...pilot confused MSL and AGL altitudes}. Remember the Italian team's mishap at Ramstein AB Germany in the late 80's.
Wonder what the overall historical mishap rate is per actual 'airshow' hours flown worldwide ? Very high, IMO ... but those stats are not calculated anywhere.
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: England
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Delaney T, you are talking rubbish
You make various statements without backing them up with proof and/or statistics then finish off by stating "Wonder what the overall historical mishap rate is per actual 'airshow' hours flown worldwide ? Very high, IMO ... but those stats are not calculated anywhere."
If these stats are not calculated, how you can state categorically that "The statistical probability is high that this L-39 crash was pilot error".
How dare you make such an assumption only 2 days after such a tragic accident.
You make various statements without backing them up with proof and/or statistics then finish off by stating "Wonder what the overall historical mishap rate is per actual 'airshow' hours flown worldwide ? Very high, IMO ... but those stats are not calculated anywhere."
If these stats are not calculated, how you can state categorically that "The statistical probability is high that this L-39 crash was pilot error".
How dare you make such an assumption only 2 days after such a tragic accident.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Delaney T, you're talking nonsense. There is of course a long list of possible causes, often occuring simultaneously, behind every accident. As always, wait for the investigation to conclude.
Ps. Anyone flying an L39 at an airshow will be a very experienced pilot.
Ps. Anyone flying an L39 at an airshow will be a very experienced pilot.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California U.S.
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
....you are talking rubbish... how can you state categorically that "The statistical probability is high that this L-39 crash was pilot error".
How dare you make such an assumption only 2 days after such a tragic accident.
How dare you make such an assumption only 2 days after such a tragic accident.
http://www.planecrashinfo.com/cause.htm
Though obvious pride in our profession makes it a bit difficult to acknowledge, the accident statistics are fairly consistent. It's not really surprising... since the pilot is the key integration & decision-making node in the aviation 'system' involved in any particular sortie -- and that any significant errors/oversights by that pilot have more serious consequences compared to other 'system' nodes/factors.
Objectively, if one were to hear a news report of an aircraft crash somewhere in the world, but knew no other details at all about that crash -- it would be logical to assume that crash was probably caused by pilot-error... because statistically that is by far the most common specific cause of aircraft crashes. It is not a denigration of the piloting profession, but merely unfortunate fact.
And IMHO airshows tend to increase the risk of pilot error, beyond that of routine flight operations.
The NTSB investigation report on this L-39 mishap should be available by the end of this year.
Stay Tuned.
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Dark Side
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Feneris,
It is MY experience, based on actual airshow/display accident reports, that the majority of pilots ARE NOT experienced particularly on the "warbirds" they fly! Usually got too much money and not enough common dog!
GAGS
E86
It is MY experience, based on actual airshow/display accident reports, that the majority of pilots ARE NOT experienced particularly on the "warbirds" they fly! Usually got too much money and not enough common dog!
GAGS
E86
DT, I guess you could save the FAA and the Accident Investigation Team a lot of time and money by submitting your finding - all done without witnessing or investigating it. What a legend.
Fact is that over the years a great many vintage aircraft have crashed or had significant incidents at public air displays. Fortunately, changes in display profiles have lessened the chances of such incidents causing death or injury to the public though of course the effect of witnessing a fatal accident at such an event is a heavy one indeed. Public enthusiasm for such events does however seem undiminished.
I have wondered upon occasion whether one of the reasons for some of the accidents is that pilots are actually perfroming manoevres at low level for which the aircraft was not actually designed - in other words, what a pilot may get away with at higher altitudes in combat situations leaves almost no room for error at display heights. There is no doubt that both the public and the display 'circus' no longer wish to simply get these old aircraft in to the sky and display them in quite the same rather more sedate manner they may have done some years ago.
Sadly such accidents will probably continue.
I have wondered upon occasion whether one of the reasons for some of the accidents is that pilots are actually perfroming manoevres at low level for which the aircraft was not actually designed - in other words, what a pilot may get away with at higher altitudes in combat situations leaves almost no room for error at display heights. There is no doubt that both the public and the display 'circus' no longer wish to simply get these old aircraft in to the sky and display them in quite the same rather more sedate manner they may have done some years ago.
Sadly such accidents will probably continue.
Do a Hover - it avoids G
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chichester West Sussex UK
Age: 91
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Delaney T
You have taken some stick from three people who seem to be either poorly informed about the subject of airshow accidents or misread your intial post.
There was nothing controversial in what you actually wrote (but you know that) neither did you say what you thought had happened to the L-39 – merely what the stats from the past would suggest. You made one minor error of fact - the Thunderbird was doing a pull through not a loop.
Some years ago I stopped keeping a tally of the number of aircraft I had actually watched fly into the ground at airshows when it reached 10. Of those only one had a technical failure that was possibly a contributory factor. I have talked to pilot friends (including myself) after their airshow near misses and established the reasons for the mistakes they made. But mistakes they did make and to their credit they never suggested otherwise.
Mind you while doing a tent peg may be tragic from some viewpoints I suspect it does not hurt. Unlike getting old.
(Drs tell me that pain signals travel round the body at about 40mph)
John F
You have taken some stick from three people who seem to be either poorly informed about the subject of airshow accidents or misread your intial post.
There was nothing controversial in what you actually wrote (but you know that) neither did you say what you thought had happened to the L-39 – merely what the stats from the past would suggest. You made one minor error of fact - the Thunderbird was doing a pull through not a loop.
Some years ago I stopped keeping a tally of the number of aircraft I had actually watched fly into the ground at airshows when it reached 10. Of those only one had a technical failure that was possibly a contributory factor. I have talked to pilot friends (including myself) after their airshow near misses and established the reasons for the mistakes they made. But mistakes they did make and to their credit they never suggested otherwise.
Mind you while doing a tent peg may be tragic from some viewpoints I suspect it does not hurt. Unlike getting old.
(Drs tell me that pain signals travel round the body at about 40mph)
John F
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: earth
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I always thought that 600kts was the critical impact speed. By the time the toes transmit the ouch! signal the brain is dead.
Unfortunately I no longer fly anything that does 600kts.
Unfortunately I no longer fly anything that does 600kts.
(Drs tell me that pain signals travel round the body at about 40mph)
N:
This all starts to sound like a lyric from the Mikado... See the first line from Pish-Tush.
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Mikado/I_am_so_proud
LO
(Tenor chorus, Basingstoke Amateur Operatic Society, 1971)
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Mikado/I_am_so_proud
LO
(Tenor chorus, Basingstoke Amateur Operatic Society, 1971)
Last edited by LowObservable; 20th Mar 2007 at 18:26.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: R4808E
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
