Future Carrier (Including Costs)
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: beyond the hedge of reason
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just a thought...
Would it not make sense to buy a flight of cat and trap capable aircraft for training and working up new carrier crews and aviators? Perhaps it would be useful to replace the FRADU Hawks with T45 Goshawks? Or even F18s?
Or am I, as is usually the case, entirely 'Out to Lunch?
Or am I, as is usually the case, entirely 'Out to Lunch?
Would it not make sense to buy .....
Lets see how quickly, and in which order, the Red Arrows / Typhoon / GR4 / RAFP / RAF Regiment / BBMF / E3D etc appear .....
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
Quite, sensible to buy cat n trap aircraft.
Sensible to suggest we them is another thing.
Sensible to suggest we them is another thing.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Due to the numbers of F-35C pilots the MOD seems likely to get, both the RAF & RN will indeed be using T-45 Goshawks for training.
NAS Pensacola will welcome those UK aviators with open arms... every year.
BTB... the final T-45 (the 221st, a T-45C) was delivered to the USN on 29 November 2009... so the production line has been closed for almost a year.
NAS Pensacola will welcome those UK aviators with open arms... every year.
BTB... the final T-45 (the 221st, a T-45C) was delivered to the USN on 29 November 2009... so the production line has been closed for almost a year.
Last edited by GreenKnight121; 26th Oct 2010 at 08:42.
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Torres Strait
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Commanding Carrier Aviation
Principle Authors: Mike Clapp, Steven Jermy, ‘Sharkey’ Ward, Sir Mike Layard and Sir John Woodward
COMMANDING CARRIER AVIATION The Phoenix Think Tank
COMMANDING CARRIER AVIATION The Phoenix Think Tank
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh my word - this article only goes to show how out of touch some of the 'old and bold' really are. I'm very surprised that Steve Jermy put his name to this piece of work (and I use that phrase loosely) since he was incredibly supportive and complimentary re JFH during his tenure in the JAMO...the fact that Sharkey Ward's name is also attached and that it was he who posted the article is not a surprise at all. Just to feed the debate, here's some of the more interesting comments from this article, which I'm sure will generate interesting discussion...
I'm sure the current crop of JFH pilots would have something to say about this throw away comment, including Sharkey's own son! I guess the team that constructed this article forgot to notice that JFH did phenomenally well in Op ALLIED FORCE, Op TELIC and Op HERRICK - all told, the force has been involved, more often than not, with high tempo, kinetic, dynamic air ops since 1999, and IMHO, performed exceptionally well. If that's what we can achieve with a 'failed experiment' just think what we'll achieve with JSF.
Firstly, why would we need to retake the FIs - there is absolutely no need to, and the last time I looked we already have a sizable force based there to 'deter' a would-be aggressor. Secondly, at present day, JFH's ability to project relevant, precise and timely air effect from the carrier far far far outweighs what the RN has been able to achieve in the past, even during the Falklands War (this is just a point, I am not denigrating what was achieved during the FI war, because it was undeniably an amazing achievement by both FAA and RAF embarked Harrier pilots).
This is a pretty broad-brush statement, especially since the FAA rely upon the RAF structure to get their pilots to the front line. I'd like to see the current stats regards FAA FW pilots v support pers (eg how many CSG pers are there v front line pilots?). More importantly, if the FAA were told to 'go it alone' without the help of the RAF structure, I wonder what the stats would look like then?
I'm afraid that this is no longer the case, and the sooner the RN realise this and face the fact that the RAF now also has a LOT of embarked experience to offer, the sooner our attempts at jointery will have more success. It may be a hard nettle to grasp, but it is essential that the RN start to acknowledge this fact - in not too many years, the RAF's recruitment poster will have an aircraft carrier on it!
How many FAA Harrier pilots have gone to command an RN carrier - not many (I think I can think of one). Does the RN suppose that the Queen Elizabeth class carriers will be commanded by ex-JSF pilots? If this is the case, will an RAF JSF pilot who has spent his/her life projecting 5th gen airpower from the sea be eligible to command the carrier vice have a station command tour? (jointery at its best perhaps!)
I could go one - and all the above from only the Executive Summary!
Ready and waiting for the spears...
the failed Joint Force Harrier experiment
Britain’s Invincible-class carrier force is in the weakest state of its thirty year life and, for example, would be unable to mount an operation to re-take the Falklands Islands.
The Fleet Air Arm (FAA) officer structures require 30% less aircrew and 40% less senior officers than RAF equivalents
The FAA has over a 100 years’ of corporate carrier experience, and represent this country’s only carrier professionals
all other carrier navies in the world have their own naval air forces, whose officers also go on to command ships
I could go one - and all the above from only the Executive Summary!
Ready and waiting for the spears...
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Torres Strait
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Defence cuts: David Cameron attacked by Royal Navy Harrier pilot
David Cameron, the Prime Minister, has been publicly rebuked over the cuts to the defence budget by a Royal Navy Harrier pilot who said he was now facing unemployment.
Defence cuts: David Cameron attacked by Royal Navy Harrier pilot - Telegraph
David Cameron, the Prime Minister, has been publicly rebuked over the cuts to the defence budget by a Royal Navy Harrier pilot who said he was now facing unemployment.
Defence cuts: David Cameron attacked by Royal Navy Harrier pilot - Telegraph
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Torres Strait
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Harrier v Tornado
BRITAIN’S FAST JET FORCES – NATIONAL INTEREST VERSUS VESTED INTEREST.
http://thephoenixthinktan...-versus-vested-interest/
BRITAIN’S FAST JET FORCES – NATIONAL INTEREST VERSUS VESTED INTEREST.
http://thephoenixthinktan...-versus-vested-interest/
I wouldn't get too excited about CSG as
a - it's just been scrapped
b - it was tiny. No more than 10 Officers at most, which may have coincided with the number of Harrier pilots we had!
a - it's just been scrapped
b - it was tiny. No more than 10 Officers at most, which may have coincided with the number of Harrier pilots we had!
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Suggestion of FAA posts on French Rafale M sqns, plus using Atlantiques to plug the Nimrod hole......
FT: RAF fast jets could fly from French carrier
FT: RAF fast jets could fly from French carrier
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Great Britain
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As I am sure has been said elsewhere, the aircraft and pilots just represent the front end of the carrier strike capability. The idiocy of the SDSR decision, which the PM is about to compound in the FR/UK Defence deal (FT Today), is that we risk losing the capability to operate jets off carriers. All of the expertise on the current CVSs will have gone (we are getting rid of the CVSs), the aircrew will have gone (either PVRd, redundant or moved to other aircraft types, the command experience will have gone (as will the met, ATC, FC, deck handlers, planners etc, etc).
In my many years in the Service and beyond it has been the most astonishing Defence decision made - I just hope the CAS (I understand the current CAS made a promise to the PM) at the time can deliver because the RN will have lost the ability. I presume the RAF will provide all of the manpower, including ship's company?
In my many years in the Service and beyond it has been the most astonishing Defence decision made - I just hope the CAS (I understand the current CAS made a promise to the PM) at the time can deliver because the RN will have lost the ability. I presume the RAF will provide all of the manpower, including ship's company?
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: troon
Age: 61
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've just had a scan through Mr Wards article and despite the anti-RAF undertones generaly he and his oppos make sense. If the UK does get these carriers (still a big IF in my opinion) then it should be the FAA that run the show.
Having worked in the MoD for 8 years with all three services I have never met anyone in the RAF that was willing to go to sea. I have also met a few that had done seatime and all had said if it were a permenent feature of their careers they would leave. One was working his notice because he hated it!
There is no doubt that the RAF could run ALL of the UK's air assets but I reckon they'd end up with so much personel churn that they'd have to admit defeat in the end. As is mooted in the article turning crews around mid deployment would not be either operationaly or cost efficient and I dare say it would not do the morale of the ships company any good either!
Having worked in the MoD for 8 years with all three services I have never met anyone in the RAF that was willing to go to sea. I have also met a few that had done seatime and all had said if it were a permenent feature of their careers they would leave. One was working his notice because he hated it!
There is no doubt that the RAF could run ALL of the UK's air assets but I reckon they'd end up with so much personel churn that they'd have to admit defeat in the end. As is mooted in the article turning crews around mid deployment would not be either operationaly or cost efficient and I dare say it would not do the morale of the ships company any good either!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gordon Brown set to deliver Commons speech
He's obviously got his finger on the pulse!
Gordon Brown will signal his return to the political fray tomorrow by making his first Commons speech since leaving Downing Street.
The former Prime Minister will insist maintenance on Britain's two new aircraft carriers should be carried out at a Scottish shipyard near his constituency, rather than in France.
The former Prime Minister will insist maintenance on Britain's two new aircraft carriers should be carried out at a Scottish shipyard near his constituency, rather than in France.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He is talking about the maintenance contracts....Not yet signed but possibly going to go to Thales and if we are not careful we will see our Carriers being refitted in Toulon....Oh the absolute shame....At least they serve wine at lunch..!!!!