False information - bombs on target?
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NOTTINGHAM
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maple,
Now that's a different argument that perhaps should not be discussed here on a public forum. However, why would we want to make multiple or 'uninterrupted runs' over the target area. That's what the weapons are designed to do, not the aircraft.
Save to say that both weapons in question have significant accuracy and significant killing power. Indeed, one can be delivered with virtual impunity!
So, Yes, quietly confident.
T-E,
That's the very point, surely. The same number of targets prosecuted by fewer more effective aircraft with modern smart weapons. It is stretching it a bit to suggest that the graphic is telling the world that a smaller air force is a better air force.
FW
PS. I'm going for a malt now, before this exchange ends up like MSN Messenger!
Originally Posted by Maple 01
As long as you accept that the bad guys have no anti-air capability and that they know nothing about decoys, jamming and deception! And assuming that Biggles can make uninterrupted runs over the target area - oh, and a PK of 100%
Still confident foldingwings?
Still confident foldingwings?
Save to say that both weapons in question have significant accuracy and significant killing power. Indeed, one can be delivered with virtual impunity!
So, Yes, quietly confident.
T-E,
That's the very point, surely. The same number of targets prosecuted by fewer more effective aircraft with modern smart weapons. It is stretching it a bit to suggest that the graphic is telling the world that a smaller air force is a better air force.
FW
PS. I'm going for a malt now, before this exchange ends up like MSN Messenger!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was just pleased to see that in the bottom middle picture, our corporate PR gurus have pluralised the 1 aircraft shelters. This poster must have been endorsed at at least SO1 level, probably higher. Fills me with confidence in our leaders.
I'matightbastard
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No mention was made of how the single airframe could be in two or more places at once.
TAC Int Bloke
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
why would we want to make multiple or 'uninterrupted runs' over the target area.
The official assessment by the UK MoD confirmed the tremendous 96% hit capability, albeit achieved under range conditions (real combat conditions usually show lower hit capabilities for virtually all of the world’s weapon types).
All this is not meant as a criticism of Brimstone, just the over optimistic propaganda being passed off as fact by the MoD