PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Military Aviation (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation-57/)
-   -   1968...what would you do differently? (https://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/503783-1968-what-would-you-do-differently.html)

Pittsextra 27th Dec 2012 11:58

1968...what would you do differently?
 
So TSR2 has been binned and now its 1968 and the F-111 order has been cancelled. What would you do if anything differently from this point on??

blaireau 27th Dec 2012 12:05

Buy F4's. I liked, indeed insisted on a good aircraft for my weekends away.

SASless 27th Dec 2012 12:09

Done and excursion to Hanoi along with my mates....all 500,000 of them.

LowObservable 27th Dec 2012 13:00

Modern avionics in the Bucc. Multimode radar, inertial, EW. And to continue the what-if, we'd probably be fitting them today with AESA, F414s and the next generation of RCS-reduction kit, and confusing the F-22s at Red Flag like they baffled the F-15s in the 1970s.

jamesdevice 27th Dec 2012 13:07

Put Wedgewood Benn on trial for Treason?
And maybe Wilson as well for good measure?

Pittsextra 27th Dec 2012 13:38


and confusing the F-22s at Red Flag like they baffled the F-15s in the 1970s.
Lets have some 1970's Bucc stories....:ok:

newt 27th Dec 2012 13:56

Lets not!!!

Pittsextra 27th Dec 2012 14:02

you prefer Jag stories :E

newt 27th Dec 2012 14:07

Much better:D:D:D:D

cuefaye 27th Dec 2012 14:28

They'd be very short ones though :eek:

CoffmanStarter 27th Dec 2012 14:34

I'd still have bought the F4 ... but more of them and not bu99ered about with the engines.

Pittsextra 27th Dec 2012 14:46

What were the French Mirage's like?

CoffmanStarter 27th Dec 2012 14:48

French ... Simples !

Squirrel 41 27th Dec 2012 14:50

Pitts:

Meaning elegant, cheap to buy, likely to break, expensive when they did, and long waits for the bits to arrive.

S41

Shaggy Sheep Driver 27th Dec 2012 14:53

I never did understand why they insisted on Speys in the F4s. Didn't the increased drag of the fuselage to accomodate the engines negate any power gain, while bestowing a greater fuel burn for the unrealised (because of the said drag) extra engine power?

CoffmanStarter 27th Dec 2012 14:55

SSD ... Political meddling ... Simples !

SOSL 27th Dec 2012 15:04

Shaggy, you're quite right - the F4J we bought backs you up. But the Spey was a beautiful jet engine.

Rgds SOS

Aileron Drag 27th Dec 2012 15:10

1968...what would you do differently?
So TSR2 has been binned and now its 1968 and the F-111 order has been cancelled. What would you do if anything differently from this point on??

Absolutely nothing. It was at that point I resigned, handed in my blue suit, and joined BEA. At least there, I thought, I'd get to fly an up-to-date jet! Bl**dy Socialists. :ugh:

airborne_artist 27th Dec 2012 15:13

The real question is whether the TSR2 would have been any good for any of the many roles for which it was intended?

Shaggy Sheep Driver 27th Dec 2012 16:02


The real question is whether the TSR2 would have been any good for any of the many roles for which it was intended?
That's a very interesting question. Those involved in its few flights insist it was an amazingly capable aeroplane, but it looks to me to have a tiny wing; great for straight line speed but not so good for manouvering and STOL despite blown surfaces.


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:06.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.