RAF Combat Aircraft Holdings : Conventional Armed Forces in Europe Treaty
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Sussex UK
Age: 66
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
RAF Combat Aircraft Holdings : Conventional Armed Forces in Europe Treaty
These statistics were made public yesterday by DASA ...
MOD Equipment Holdings : CAF in Europe statistics
The data is at 1st Jan 2013 and naturally excludes our hardware based out in Afghanistan and the Falkland Islands.
Looking specifically at Section 4.02.03
I noticed 64 Jag's along with 26 JP's declared. So they've been withdrawn from RAF service but who is sitting on them and where ?
There are/were a few Jag's at Bentwaters ... does any one know if these "holdings" have now diminished through sale and or destruction ?
I didn't post some of the sad pics of the Jag's at Bentwaters (easy to find with Google) ... very sad indeed
Sad reading the other stats ... under Section 4.02.08 ... I wonder how close we ever came to our ceiling of 900 Combat Aircraft in Europe ... we might need to go back two/three decades for that
As an aside ... it's interesting that the JP was counted "in" but the Tucano is "out"
It would seem this is the reason.
Best ...
Coff.
UK MOD DASA
MOD Equipment Holdings : CAF in Europe statistics
The data is at 1st Jan 2013 and naturally excludes our hardware based out in Afghanistan and the Falkland Islands.
Looking specifically at Section 4.02.03
I noticed 64 Jag's along with 26 JP's declared. So they've been withdrawn from RAF service but who is sitting on them and where ?
There are/were a few Jag's at Bentwaters ... does any one know if these "holdings" have now diminished through sale and or destruction ?
I didn't post some of the sad pics of the Jag's at Bentwaters (easy to find with Google) ... very sad indeed
Sad reading the other stats ... under Section 4.02.08 ... I wonder how close we ever came to our ceiling of 900 Combat Aircraft in Europe ... we might need to go back two/three decades for that
As an aside ... it's interesting that the JP was counted "in" but the Tucano is "out"
It would seem this is the reason.
Primary trainer aircraft These aircraft are designed and constructed for primary flying training and means aircraft which may possess only limited armament capability necessary for basic training in weapon delivery techniques.
Coff.
UK MOD DASA
Last edited by CoffmanStarter; 2nd Aug 2013 at 14:53.
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That brings back memories - the Sqn sim , quite an enjoyable part of the course from what I remember; got to play at being rects controller, flems, JENGO etc. I seam to recall they also had a Hunter which could be used for ground runs; the CO of the college would come down and taxi it around the airfield for a few minutes to simulate a sortie then we would receive it back and do the after-flight. We were fortunate to have a good number of ex techies on our course, they kept us newbees straight. God bless you guys where ever you are, happy days.
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Lydney, Glos
Age: 73
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CFE
As an ex CFE staff officer, we had to count them all gate guardians,museum pieces etc, unless they had been formally destroyed physically like the poor old Buccaneers at Lossiemouth when I was SATCO there. Carted out of the gate to the scrap yard in bits. I recall the Buccaneer at the petrol station in Elgin on the Lossiemouth road causing a little stir during one CFE inspection!
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PhillipG
Interesting that the number of Lightnings is increasing, where had they been before not to count?
Originally Posted by table 4.02.03 note 2
Obsolete non-operational equipment used as training aids, gate guardians, and museum pieces on CFE-declared sites.
They were on "non-CFE" sites, and have been moved to "CFE-declared" sites.
So what about the Hunter Gate Guards at RAF Valley, RAF Waddington (8 Sqn), RAF Halton and RAF Henlow? Don't they count?
LJ
LJ
Last edited by Lima Juliet; 3rd Aug 2013 at 08:37.
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Road to Nowhere
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am sure I've posted this before, but Uk policy used to be to declare averything, including Gate Guardians and the like, in the same section as the actual in-service airframes. ISTR it just made it easier all round that trying to prove that a particular gate guardian was no longer decarable because its fuel tanks were full of concrete, main spar cut or whatever.
I don't think we ever got near the ceiling.
STH
I don't think we ever got near the ceiling.
STH
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Sussex UK
Age: 66
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Interesting ...
So the above list also looks to be "ex" the MOD QinetiQ assets at BD ... no Alpha Jet's for example ?
So the above list also looks to be "ex" the MOD QinetiQ assets at BD ... no Alpha Jet's for example ?
Last edited by CoffmanStarter; 3rd Aug 2013 at 10:38.
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
STH, true, we used to report a number Spartans even though they were up to their 'necks' in mud on the bombing range. New reporting officer saw sense and removed them from the count.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Sussex UK
Age: 66
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Last edited by CoffmanStarter; 3rd Aug 2013 at 17:34.