Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

USAF Kc135 crash Bishkek

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

USAF Kc135 crash Bishkek

Old 7th May 2013, 13:40
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,795
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
And there was I hoping that the tinfoil hate idiots, MSFS geeks and the like were confining themselves to endless pages of drivel about the cause of the B-747F accident at Bagram....

Always easy to spot a timewaster on the Mil board - they refer to a woodworking tool rather than to an aircraft. They probably couldn't tell you the difference between an 'aircraft' or an 'aeroplane' either....

SASless, apart from multiple birdstrikes, I can think of another possible explanation, but am not going to post it here.
BEagle is online now  
Old 7th May 2013, 13:51
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,130
Received 169 Likes on 87 Posts
I can think of another possible explanation, but am not going to post it here.
Then why mention it?
melmothtw is offline  
Old 7th May 2013, 15:18
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,167
Received 366 Likes on 223 Posts
What did I miss?
"The hatch just blew!"

Given where it was flying, I am trying to puzzle out how someone comes up with SAM/MANPAD as a factor.

It's a reach, eh? A long reach, even ...

Last edited by Lonewolf_50; 7th May 2013 at 15:20.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 7th May 2013, 16:40
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: oxford
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The crew - RIP


Air Force names airmen killed in Kyrgyzstan KC-135 crash - Air Force - Stripes
lj101 is offline  
Old 7th May 2013, 17:24
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,167
Received 366 Likes on 223 Posts
They shall grow not old, as we that are left grow old:
Age shall not weary them, nor the years contemn.
At the going down of the sun and in the morning
We will remember them.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 7th May 2013, 18:42
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,795
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
PLEASE no-one post that sickly 'slipped the surly bonds of earth' clichéd crap....

The point I was trying to make, SASless, is that many of us might have our own ideas, but will NOT post them in a forum infested by people who are frankly not qualified to comment - and whose drivel merely diverts attention....

Last edited by BEagle; 7th May 2013 at 18:43.
BEagle is online now  
Old 7th May 2013, 22:22
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SASless: Add to your inventory of possible causes, "Aft Cabin Pressure Bulkhead failure due to fatigue and corrosin".
cpants is offline  
Old 8th May 2013, 04:38
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they refer to a woodworking tool rather than to an aircraft
Better get used to it BEagle. The word, usually preceded by an apostrophe, has been in use since the earliest days of heavy than air flight. Unless preceded by the apostrophe, the word in the days of old, meant "wing". Remember when you used to be a gay chap? Not any more though. Meanings change, and not necessarily for the better.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 8th May 2013, 08:16
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,130
Received 169 Likes on 87 Posts
Remember when you used to be a gay chap?
Epic thread drift!
melmothtw is offline  
Old 8th May 2013, 09:33
  #50 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.....also an assumption................
BOAC is offline  
Old 8th May 2013, 11:59
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, it is a rumour network..
Al R is offline  
Old 8th May 2013, 19:45
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Weston-Super-Mare
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
KC135 Crash

I can't help but think of the similarities between this and the Nimrod crash. God bless all of those lost and those they leave behind.
earwigger is offline  
Old 9th May 2013, 17:54
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has the KC 135 fleet and variants been grounded?
Phoney Tony is offline  
Old 9th May 2013, 20:36
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,280
Received 491 Likes on 205 Posts
Brilliant Question.....grounding the entire 135 fleet would do "What" to Combat Operations extant?

What do you think the chances of that happening are?
SASless is offline  
Old 9th May 2013, 20:39
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London
Age: 66
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Brilliant Question.....grounding the entire 135 fleet would do "What" to Combat Operations extant?

What do you think the chances of that happening are?
ZERO and even more Zero
Dysonsphere is offline  
Old 10th May 2013, 04:27
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wingham NSW Australia
Age: 83
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
KC 135 - B 707

Seems to be that some believe the B707 and the KC135 are one and the same. They both share the same genesis, the Boeing 367-80. The KC135 pre-dates the B707 by about 18 months, is a narrower and shorter airframe with different construction.

Apart from training flights the aircraft would have been predominately subjected to heavy weight take-offs and over time has been given significant engine upgrades. The type first entered service in around 1957, fifty-six years ago. The last production airframe was built in 1965 so the accident aircraft was at least
forty-eight years old.

Hopefully the cause will be determined and published, otherwise we learn nothing.
Old Fella is offline  
Old 10th May 2013, 07:16
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It uses the same basic airframe as the 700 series which means the floor is approx 15 inches narrower and so is the cabin shell.

Makes me very sad that good men and women go in harms way and their service is not appreciated by many.

Lest We Forget

Regards

Col
herkman is offline  
Old 10th May 2013, 11:31
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SASless Brilliant Question.....grounding the entire 135 fleet would do "What" to Combat Operations extant?

What do you think the chances of that happening are?


I would hope the risk owner has carefully balanced operational requirement with operating a platform with a potential fleet wide problem. If indeed the fleet is still flying it would indicate:

The operational need outweighed individuals risk.
The fault was understood and manageable.
A mixture of both.
Phoney Tony is offline  
Old 10th May 2013, 15:28
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,280
Received 491 Likes on 205 Posts
Operational necessity precludes grounding the entire fleet.

Simple enough.

Even if they found something of interest/concern fleet-wide....they would have to do a phased program of inspections all the while meeting Operational requirements.

The Air Force could alter some demand by altering the way they operate but Combat Operations would have to continue even at some risk if need be.

The Tankers are not hauling blue collar folk on sunshine holidays....they have a mission that requires they be there to pass gas.
SASless is offline  
Old 10th May 2013, 15:47
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they have a mission that requires they be there to pass gas.
What mission is that exactly? Seems pretty irrelevant these days bearing in mind how long we have been fighting it and how little seems to have been achieved.
VinRouge is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.