PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aircrew
Reload this Page Cranditz flying course lengths
Forgotten your Username/Password?
Register Forms FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read


Military Aircrew A forum for the professionals who fly the non-civilian hardware, and the backroom boys and girls without whom nothing would leave the ground. Army, Navy and Airforces of the World, all equally welcome here.


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 23rd Apr 2002, 11:40   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 58
Question Cranditz flying course lengths
Havin been grounded from flying for a while due to a back injury, I am just about to hopefully get re-upgraded again by a med board and then posted to Stalag Luft I at Cranditz for either a MEXO or a QFI course(UAS, as I am unfit for bang seats unfortunately).

Before I go into bat with PTC about which I would prefer, can anyone tell me what the course lengths are for both (to see if I can get a quarter)????

Any constructive suggestions about the courses also greatly appreciated.
The English Passenger is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2002, 17:34   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: near the squirrel sanctuary
Posts: 192
CFS Tutor Cse is about 6 months including AIC. Don't know about MEXO but I would think that it is less.
kippermate is offline  
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Closed Thread
 

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:28.

Privacy Policy - Terms and Conditions - Contact Us - PPRuNe Home - Archive - Top

vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".