Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

No more Vulcan from next year

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

No more Vulcan from next year

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Oct 2012, 20:54
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Englandshire
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No more Vulcan from next year

BBC News - Vulcan bomber XH558 to be grounded
GalleyTeapot is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2012, 21:04
  #2 (permalink)  

Dog Tired
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well, it was good while it lasted.
fantom is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2012, 21:06
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd rather see one Vulcan than nine poxy hawks.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2012, 21:12
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Mos Eisley
Age: 48
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it was good while it lasted
Apparently there's a headstone with that written on it looking for a new home...
OafOrfUxAche is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2012, 21:32
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a taxpayer I'm making my views felt.

That you don't like 'em doesn't bother me.

Anyhoo, I'm sure there will be another 'reds' subject you can fart on about in a few months time.

Last edited by Willard Whyte; 12th Oct 2012 at 21:40.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2012, 21:36
  #6 (permalink)  
si.
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Northumberland
Age: 52
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not wishing to join the bun fight, but....

It would be nice if there was money available to fly the older aircraft, at public expence. The Red's and the BBMF are both great, but there's an awfull lot of hardware gone between the two...
si. is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2012, 21:41
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Indeed, Michelin Stars.

Not that you will ever get to find out.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2012, 22:13
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The Vulcan XH558 took its first flight on 25 May 1960 and was originally built to carry nuclear weapons but was only ever used as a nuclear deterrent.

The bomber retired from service in 1993 and is the only one left of the 134 that were built for the Royal Air Force.
They do write some ****e, don't they.

I vividly recall, as a 14 year old schoolboy, something to do with an 8000 mile bombing mission in the South Atlantic. Nothing at all to do with "Bombs, HC".

In 1993, it may have been the only one left in the RAF, and it displayed at my squadron's disbandment at BZZ. Most impressive. Certainly not "the only one left" of the fleet though.
Roadster280 is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2012, 22:17
  #9 (permalink)  
Sir George Cayley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Only one left? I don't think so.

SGC
 
Old 12th Oct 2012, 22:21
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do you expect anything more from the BBC ?

The person writing the story probably wasn't even
born in 1982 !
500N is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2012, 22:52
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: England
Posts: 100
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd rather see one Vulcan than nine poxy hawks.
I totally agree with WW. Not knocking the "Reds" at all, just the utterly boring aircraft they have to fly (For advertising "BAE Systems" purposes)!

I would much rather See, hear and FEEL one Vulcan display!

Unfortunately some of you are SO brainwashed and immune to sarcasym.......but perhaps thats a good thing for the Military to be.


Now put them in nine Twyfooms and it would be a MUCH harder choice. One can but dream..........
stumpey is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2012, 23:01
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Livingston, Scotland
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what do you choose to believe?

On the one hand, "it will never fly again" stories have become a standard part of XH558 winter fundraising activities in recent years.

On the other, this does have a slightly different tone to past messages, so it may be more real: and it does come on the heels of the mangling of two engines at Finningley, which inevitably raised doubts about the future.

On the third (did they say it was only metallurgists who had three hands?) PPRuNe is the place to go if you want to find negative views about XH558: from, perhaps, what you might expect to be the best informed community on the subject anywhere.

So what do you choose to believe?

I've now seen XH558 do her stuff half a dozen times since 2008, at East Fortune and Leuchars. Four memories stick with me.

One is that unique engine tone as the power is increased. A throwback to witnessing a mass Vulcan takeoff at a Finningley Airshow in (I think) the very early 70s. The second was a roll off the top of a takeoff at Leuchars in 2009.

The third was at the press day at Leuchars in, I think, 2008: the look on the face of a Dutch F16 pilot as he saw a shape he'd never seen flying before.

And the fourth was at this year's perfect Leuchars Air Show, with a nearly three year old grandson who still tells me that the "Vulcan was very loud"; only he makes it sound like "falcon".

I suppose, at least, that young Alistair will always remember that he did see the Vulcan flying when he was small.
Kluseau is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2012, 00:08
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 349
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think it should come over here to the US where there is more of a "can do" attitude, rather than the "its not going to be flyable anymore".
Putting on hard hat for the expected US-bashing.

f
fleigle is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2012, 06:19
  #14 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Knowing first hand what it took to keep them flying in the sixties, when we had full manufacturer spares support and the defence budget to support us, I think they've done a fantastic job to keep 558 in flying condition for six years. But all good things must come to an end, and she's had her day. Twice.
Blacksheep is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2012, 07:17
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,559
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
Perhaps now 558 will stop sucking in all the "Vulcan money" and something may be available for proper historic Vulcans to be preserved, such as XM607 that is doing a very good impression of a ten-year-old Triumph Dolomite outside at Waddington.
Wensleydale is online now  
Old 13th Oct 2012, 12:55
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The US of A, and sometimes Bonnie Scotland
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Come on guys. Stop knocking the Reds on this thread.
Why can't you just reminisce about the fine Vulcan, and leave the Reds out of it!
The financial link is tenuous in the extreme. The funding is from completely different sources. Or do you, WW, think it comes from one big pot?? Well done you.
I'm still in the mob, and feel the good the Reds do outweigh the negativity you suggest. Why use this as another reason to knock the "poxy Hawks". Nice. Again, well done you.

Go on. Why not put on some great photos of the Vulcan, ones that we can all enjoy. You know it makes sense.

Last edited by betty swallox; 13th Oct 2012 at 12:56.
betty swallox is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2012, 18:19
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Come on guys - they're only looking for a couple of hundred thousand

I reckon they are fishing for a one-off big donation by a "patriotic millionaire" (ie someone in need of a knighthood) which saves them handling thousands of £5 donations

TBH they've done a great job but every year its the same "it'll never fly again" story - and yet she still flies
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2012, 18:53
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: -
Age: 54
Posts: 240
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Oh come on guys VTTS have been flagging the main spar issue up for years so this news shouldn't come as a surprise. Posters on Pprune have also commented about the displays and the perception that they've been using up the fatigue life at a fast pace. There is also a link on BBC BBC News - Vulcan bomber XH558 to be grounded saying that they will run out of usable spare engines by 2014. Lastly VTTS have said that they have been exploring ways of funding a permanent ground display/museum using XH558 as a centrepiece when the time comes for it to be grounded.
skydiver69 is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2012, 19:23
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,805
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Top of the list is the limited life of XH558’s engines. “From the start of the 2014 season, it is unlikely that we could accommodate any engine failures and that even without any technical problems, soon our set of engines would be out of life,” says Edmondson. “There are no more airworthy engines available, and refurbishment would be so difficult and costly that there is no possibility that it will happen.”
Has anyone yet seen any report concerning the completely avoidable destruction of 2 airworthy and quite priceless Olympus engines earlier this year?
BEagle is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2012, 19:58
  #20 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I didn't understand the bit about wing modifications unless they mean an entirely new Mod to reinforce the wings as opposed to a re-spar or repair.

The engines would appear to be the stopper though. Their mtbf was very low in the 60s and compared with a modern fan they are the equivalent of the Bleriot. If it could be fixed for £200k, so be it.

To say they have run out of engines, how many installed power plants are there in museums around the world?

The Panton brothers discovered that their merlins were perfectly serviceable, so maybe they could find some 201s n museums and do a swappsey.
Pontius Navigator is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.