PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aircrew
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Military Aircrew A forum for the professionals who fly the non-civilian hardware, and the backroom boys and girls without whom nothing would leave the ground. Army, Navy and Airforces of the World, all equally welcome here.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11th Jul 2012, 09:30   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 63
Medium Sized Maritime Surveillance Aircraft, anyone?

Is this what we need, perhaps?

Any guesses on what airframe they might have in mind?

Boeing teases at Farnborough with vague offer of medium-sized maritime surveillance aircraft for global export - Military & Aerospace Electronics
Tester07 is offline   Reply
Old 11th Jul 2012, 10:53   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: deepest darkest Wiltshire
Posts: 32
will it be a 1950's world's first jet airliner???????

I'll get my coat!
Tea White Zero is offline   Reply
Old 11th Jul 2012, 11:07   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Upper Deck
Age: 49
Posts: 87
Boeing were involved with the design of the Sukhoi Superjet 100. With mountain spotting radar fitted it would fall into the medium bracket airframe. About 1000nm range. Ironic its basically Ruski.
jumbojet is offline   Reply
Old 11th Jul 2012, 16:55   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House (and I'm not really Age: 84, I may in fact be dead, or might as well be)
Age: 84
Posts: 1,019
I get the impression from that computer generated image in the link that it's more large Biz-Jet in size.

The 'dual sweep' of the leading edge is throwing me, id wise, at the moment, assuming it's not just a generic image rather than frame specific.

edit: Falcon 7X-ish?


Last edited by Willard Whyte; 11th Jul 2012 at 17:02.
Willard Whyte is offline   Reply
Old 11th Jul 2012, 19:41   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Shelton WA.
Posts: 163
It'll be a UAV.

Last edited by Gemini Twin; 11th Jul 2012 at 19:42.
Gemini Twin is offline   Reply
Old 11th Jul 2012, 20:00   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House (and I'm not really Age: 84, I may in fact be dead, or might as well be)
Age: 84
Posts: 1,019
Perhaps, but that's not what the piccy in the link suggests.

Unless the flight deck windows are for the benefit of the ground crew who service it.
Willard Whyte is offline   Reply
Old 11th Jul 2012, 20:12   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 63
I think you're right. Having read another link elsewhere, when they say 'medium sized', I think they are referring to a medium sized business jet.

I guess that as we are in the process of getting rid of one of those (Sentinel), we would not be in the market for this.
Tester07 is offline   Reply
Old 11th Jul 2012, 20:20   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 46
Flight had this story yesterday.

Quote:
The aircraft, which Boeing officials say is based on a “super mid-sized business jet”, would leverage the best of the P-8’s technology. Boeing will not identify the exact type of aircraft, however, but will say it is a fairly large jet with high-bypass turbofans.

Last edited by LastMinute; 11th Jul 2012 at 21:44.
LastMinute is offline   Reply
Old 11th Jul 2012, 20:50   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a bolt
Posts: 5,206
Wouldn't something like this be better?



Wings Over New Zealand - 'Fly by light' Japanese maritime patrol A/C

http://warship-pics.********.co.uk/2...me-patrol.html

Last edited by NutLoose; 11th Jul 2012 at 20:52.
NutLoose is offline   Reply
Old 11th Jul 2012, 21:01   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: troon
Age: 50
Posts: 504
Correct me if i'm wrong but dont the Japs have a no export rule about mil equipt?
althenick is offline   Reply
Old 11th Jul 2012, 21:04   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Originally UK, now Australia
Age: 48
Posts: 2,116
althenick

That was the case but that changed in December 2011.

.

Last edited by 500N; 11th Jul 2012 at 21:06.
500N is offline   Reply
Old 11th Jul 2012, 21:05   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,700
Didn't General Dynamics and Convair do this last century?

SGC
Sir George Cayley is offline   Reply
Old 12th Jul 2012, 03:35   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Western Colorado USA
Posts: 1,048
Indeed, Japan is looking to make some money in the international arms market.

For another example, the Aussies have already made a visit to inspect the IJN's Soryu class subs with an eye for their Collins-class replacement program.

Navy eyeing off new Japanese submarines

Last edited by GreenKnight121; 12th Jul 2012 at 03:38.
GreenKnight121 is offline   Reply
Old 12th Jul 2012, 10:26   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dublin
Posts: 561
If Boeing still have the capability, then why not just dust off the 717-100x as a platform?

JAS
Just a spotter is offline   Reply
Old 12th Jul 2012, 13:31   #15 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Destin
Age: 64
Posts: 11,000
Why build "new" airframes.....why not just modify existing models of aircraft for the maritime role.....say the C-130. The trick to capability is numbers and availability of aircraft.

It has got to be cheaper to mod proven airframes than design-build-test-field new aircraft from scratch.

Subs are fast but even an old Herky Bird can keep up with them and with loads of fuel instead of cargo....could have the endurance to hang around for long periods of time.

Having that big ol' ramp on the rear end from which SAR rescue gear and SF Operations gear could be dropped would be a plus as well. Bring back aerial pickup equipment and it could be a really interesting airplane.


Last edited by SASless; 12th Jul 2012 at 13:40.
SASless is offline   Reply
Old 12th Jul 2012, 16:31   #16 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: scotland
Posts: 276
There was a new Swedish MPA demonstrator at Waddington and RIAT, don't have any further info on how good it is.
KPax is offline   Reply
Old 12th Jul 2012, 17:12   #17 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The real world
Posts: 289
Am wondering how long the seedcorners will have in post once funding is officially denied for a new MPA?
Jayand is offline   Reply
Old 12th Jul 2012, 21:50   #18 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 680
Quote:
Why build "new" airframes.....why not just modify existing models of aircraft for the maritime role.....say the C-130.
Please just stop.
The Old Fat One is offline   Reply
Old 13th Jul 2012, 08:00   #19 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Far North of Watford
Age: 71
Posts: 138
Careful with your blood pressure TOFO! But I know what you mean. To quote from the bard (Dillon) when will they ever learn?
Genstabler is online now   Reply
Old 13th Jul 2012, 10:29   #20 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,802
Devil

Quote:
Why build "new" airframes.....why not just modify existing models of aircraft for the maritime role.....say the C-130

Given AML's (DD/Avionics(RAF)) insistence in 1997 that C130 was fitted with Active Dipping Sonar, and his committal of rather large sums to procuring ADS LRUs and spares for C130, at least this idea has a head start. Only need to ensure the aircraft is stable in the hover......
tucumseh is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 10:42.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".