PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aircrew
Forgotten your Username/Password?

Military Aircrew A forum for the professionals who fly the non-civilian hardware, and the backroom boys and girls without whom nothing would leave the ground. Army, Navy and Airforces of the World, all equally welcome here.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 1st Feb 2012, 21:09   #81 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swindonshire
Posts: 1,686
Sigh. Rewrote that bit of the post so that it read a little better, but made it factually incorrect (well, I think I did, but that's the bit I want to check).
Archimedes is online now   Reply
Old 1st Feb 2012, 21:18   #82 (permalink)


Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: .
Posts: 2,189
Wikipedia says min 200 feet, but we all know how accurate that is..
Milo Minderbinder is offline   Reply
Old 1st Feb 2012, 22:55   #83 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 102
Quote:
Didnt realist that JP233 became available early enough
I must admit I am stretching my memory here. I can't remember whether it had started to come into service, TBH.
kiwibrit is offline   Reply
Old 2nd Feb 2012, 06:01   #84 (permalink)
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 70
Posts: 10,348
KB, into service or not, we are into speculation here. Remember Vulcans hadn't flight refuelled for 18 years, they didn't have ARMs. The Nimrod was not AAR capable and I don't think our C130 was either.

We talked of Vulcans self-designating with LGB. 11 years later the Tornado still needed 3rd party designation with only the Bucc self-designating.

So some suggestions are realistic alternatives, others pure speculation on what we might have been able to do given 6 months more time. JP233 is possibly in that area as indeed would a Tornado deployment to ASI.

The deterrent value of an unknown aircraft like Tornado however was wholly different to the assumed capability of 4 Vulcan during Confrontation as we supposedly had a nuclear capabilty for 7 years.
Pontius Navigator is online now   Reply
Old 2nd Feb 2012, 14:14   #85 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: earth
Posts: 1,378
There is a reason, Pontius, why it took so long to get a designator on Tornado - I know because of my involvement in the process. The problem was ignorance at the top - their headships were looking at Tornado weapon scores on controlled ranges and comparing them with the 50% CEP of Paveway 2. Typical range scores counted most bombs inside 30 feet as a DH whereas LGB scores were from a calibrated target and extremely accurate. If you compare apples and oranges you get a lemon and that was what Tornado was with dumb bombs.
soddim is offline   Reply
Old 2nd Feb 2012, 14:38   #86 (permalink)
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 70
Posts: 10,348
Soddim, can't disagree there. I know the Tornado was spectacularly accurate compared with the F111 with high level scores on the RBS ranges, so good that they were only invited once to the Giant Voice competition IIRC.

Now we know how good an RBS score was.

As you say the practice bombs scores were also a bit iffy. I have a picture in my log book of a direct hit on the raft at Epi. The bomb burst and splash were quite spectacular but had it been a 1000lb bomb and a tank the tankers would have had nothing to worry about.
Pontius Navigator is online now   Reply
Old 16th Apr 2012, 10:21   #87 (permalink)


Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: northumberland
Posts: 1
The trawlers, Cordella, Farnella, Northella, Junella, Pict were manned by Royal Navy personnel and were in Mine sweeper/Mine countermeasures role and carried the bomb disposal teams of FCDT 1 / FCDT 3, who cleared unexploded ordnance from several ships of the taskforce. Also they cross-decked ammunition from supply ships in South Georgia; as well as sweeping the channels into Stanley/Port William post conflict.
spiller82 is offline   Reply
Old 16th Apr 2012, 18:41   #88 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 45 yards from a tropical beach
Posts: 1,078
Any ship can be a minesweeper...








Once!
Neptunus Rex is offline   Reply
Old 16th Apr 2012, 18:52   #89 (permalink)


Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: .
Posts: 2,189
just has to be noisy enough
Milo Minderbinder is offline   Reply
Old 16th Apr 2012, 22:57   #90 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cantab
Posts: 87
Ref "Mil's" "second fleet"

As a non-mil type with a passing interest in Military history and logistics, the comment about a "second fleet" is very interesting - I've not heard anything of this before; but from an escalation point of view, the concept makes sense.

Would this have been a hotchpotch of recently decomissioned assets, rush-jobs on ships in-build/re-work and a retrenchment of extant vessels from around the world? Could we really have seen half-finished T42's with Tribals and additional Leanders etc making up a true second fleet supporting Bulwark and Illustrious?

On that note, were all RN naval assets worldwide immediately re-deployed homewards at the first sign of the troubles?

For those interested in reading about the Falklands, I recommend "Canberra, The Great White Whale Goes to War"....one of the first and still one of the best accounts of the conflict.
twinjetter is offline   Reply
Reply
 
 
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:03.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network