PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aircrew
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Military Aircrew A forum for the professionals who fly the non-civilian hardware, and the backroom boys and girls without whom nothing would leave the ground. Army, Navy and Airforces of the World, all equally welcome here.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 7th Dec 2011, 06:49   #221 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Originally UK, now Australia
Age: 48
Posts: 2,190
ORAC

You might need to provide a link to it if you get my meaning.


anyway, don't forget they also smell of pepper spray ! LOL
500N is online now   Reply
Old 7th Dec 2011, 08:16   #222 (permalink)
HTB
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Over the hill (and far away)
Posts: 242
M2

Just a minor point, but I think it worth mentioning - US is in NATO, so would they be obliged to retaliate against themseves post-strike agin Iran?

Mister B
HTB is offline   Reply
Old 7th Dec 2011, 08:26   #223 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Malkin Tower
Posts: 850
Willard
especially for you
Scat / Droppings
jamesdevice is offline   Reply
Old 7th Dec 2011, 08:36   #224 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Originally UK, now Australia
Age: 48
Posts: 2,190
And the difference between Black Bear and Grizzly bear

Watch For Bears Joke
500N is online now   Reply
Old 7th Dec 2011, 08:37   #225 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK and where I'm sent!
Posts: 372
Why didn't anyone tell me before, Mister B? So NATO is us, The USA and China, right? Anyway, luckily, I mistakenly said

"Iran joins NATO. Israel and the US bomb them. The rest of NATO is obliged to retaliate"

Note the accidental use of the word REST. So I need to adapt my new scenario in light of this new intelligence:

Arab League sanctions Iran. Iran applies to join NATO, EU and Euro zone and is accepted because it puts in the lowest bid to build the UK's new generation of nuclear plant AND the Trident replacement. Israel and the US bomb Iran because they need a war that can give quicker results than the previous two in order to push through their Defense (sic) spending bill. The REST of NATO is obliged to retaliate (an attack against one is an attack against all). We're at war. UK surrenders to the US so we're all effectively POWs, and the country is annexed. US has to pick up our national debt and everything is rosy.

I'm going to lie down now.
Mach Two is offline   Reply
Old 7th Dec 2011, 09:06   #226 (permalink)
HTB
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Over the hill (and far away)
Posts: 242
M2

You see, all that staff training was worthwhile in the end, you just forgot the detail...

When you say "the rest of NATO", does that include Germany and France? That new scenario is taking shape; I just hope that they don't make us drink Dr Pepper and eat maple syrup on our eggs over easy or SoS - cruel and unusual punishment.:

Mister B
HTB is offline   Reply
Old 7th Dec 2011, 09:11   #227 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK and where I'm sent!
Posts: 372
Germany are in it too??? I thought they were the bad guys. Oh, you mean West Germany?
Mach Two is offline   Reply
Old 7th Dec 2011, 09:21   #228 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Originally UK, now Australia
Age: 48
Posts: 2,190
Germany and France will sit this one out and then do a deal with the US
to take over the UK.
500N is online now   Reply
Old 7th Dec 2011, 09:26   #229 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK and where I'm sent!
Posts: 372
So get used to the Euro, sausages and that awful cabbage stuff now. Oh, dear. Next you'll be telling me our bombers and fighters will be made in Germany too!!! Now that would be stupid.
Mach Two is offline   Reply
Old 7th Dec 2011, 09:37   #230 (permalink)
HTB
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Over the hill (and far away)
Posts: 242
Don't forget the pig knuckle and furry tennis ball with gravy; all washed down with a quite reasonable selection of yellow beer (other types of beverage are available). Actually, some of the red cabbage dishes aren't too bad - similar to Delia's spicy recipe in her Christmas (or is it winter?) cookbook.

Mister B
HTB is offline   Reply
Old 7th Dec 2011, 09:44   #231 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK and where I'm sent!
Posts: 372
Mister B, my father didn't die in three world wars so we could all go around eating cabbage. Actually, I might have to give them the pig knuckle. It was very good in the German (presumably West German) Club at Deci. Hey, this plan is looking up.
Mach Two is offline   Reply
Old 7th Dec 2011, 10:18   #232 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: SW France
Age: 56
Posts: 115
Have look at this:

Then google "iran air defences" & look at the Wikepedia entries. Their air force is outdated but large & I would suggest that due to denial of spares, the US supplied A/C are mainly grounded. However, they have a large number of Soviet supplied MIG's that could pose real problems to an Israeli/US air assault. But they have invested heavily in very potent Surface to Air Missiles with state of the art C&C systems.

The UK is now not even a 3rd world country militarily - we rank near the bottom...

The UK has NO medium to long range missile defence whatsover. Having been out of the services since 1997 I have no idea whether the Army or RAF Regt still have Rapier (only good to about 8nm)?

We have no A/C capable of long range bombing without a complex/risky & highly expensive AAR tanker trail. We have no A/C Carrier's anymore & the nuclear submarine fleet is totally dependant on US supplies/maintenance of the outdated Trident missiles. That is where the US want us to be - with second generation "cast-off nuclear missiles", & at their beck & call as to spares/maintenance - which they can refuse anytime.

This is why France, Israel, India, South Africa & Pakistan decided decades ago to develop their own nuclear weapons programs & go it alone.

To put it bluntly, the sucessive goverments from the 70's have a lot to answer for. Each one has made enormous cuts to the defence budget (to protect us all!) in favour of paying hundreds (& in many cases, thousands) of pounds a week to MILLIONS of feckless, ignoramouses who would rather sit watching daytime TV than get a job.

So, to you great people who risk your live's every day for peanuts, do you think that what you are doing makes any sense, to be paid a Central London Traffic Warden's salary to do a highly sensitive & complex photo analysts intelligence job?

I don't think so.
SAMXXV is offline   Reply
Old 7th Dec 2011, 10:19   #233 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: SW France
Age: 56
Posts: 115
Have look at this:

Then google "iran air defences" & look at the Wikepedia entries. Their air force is outdated but large & I would suggest that due to denial of spares, the US supplied A/C are mainly grounded. However, they have a large number of Soviet supplied MIG's that could pose real problems to an Israeli/US air assault. But they have invested heavily in very potent Surface to Air Missiles with state of the art C&C systems.

The UK is now not even a 3rd world country militarily - we rank near the bottom...

The UK has NO medium to long range missile defence whatsover. Having been out of the services since 1997 I have no idea whether the Army or RAF Regt still have Rapier (only good to about 8nm)?

We have no A/C capable of long range bombing without a complex/risky & highly expensive AAR tanker trail. We have no A/C Carrier's anymore & the nuclear submarine fleet is totally dependant on US supplies/maintenance of the outdated Trident missiles. That is where the US want us to be - with second generation "cast-off nuclear missiles", & at their beck & call as to spares/maintenance - which they can refuse anytime.

This is why France, Israel, India, South Africa & Pakistan decided decades ago to develop their own nuclear weapons programs & go it alone.

To put it bluntly, the sucessive goverments from the 70's have a lot to answer for. Each one has made enormous cuts to the defence budget (to protect us all!) in favour of paying hundreds (& in many cases, thousands) of pounds a week to MILLIONS of feckless, ignoramouses who would rather sit watching daytime TV than get a job.

So, to you great people who risk your live's every day for peanuts, do you think that what you are doing makes any sense, to be paid a Central London Traffic Warden's salary to do a highly sensitive & complex photo analysts intelligence job?

I don't think so.
SAMXXV is offline   Reply
Old 7th Dec 2011, 10:25   #234 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK and where I'm sent!
Posts: 372
Oh, Déjà vu. Anyway, on Iran's US supplied a/c, you are right. In fact most of them stopped working 20 yeas ago. I'll come back to the rest later...
Mach Two is offline   Reply
Old 7th Dec 2011, 10:41   #235 (permalink)
HTB
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Over the hill (and far away)
Posts: 242
Didn't Iraq have lots of Sov fighter types back in 1991?

Don't forget N Korea in that nuclear club - we expect them to pitch in after midnight on 15 Dec to get Apocalygeddon rolling; only 8 and a bit days to go now, the tension is rising.

Anyhow, some daytime telly is quite good - watched an afternoon programme the other day that kept me enthralled...Wales vs Autralia.

Mister B
HTB is offline   Reply
Old 7th Dec 2011, 11:40   #236 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 96
Mister B,

Yes they did.

Iran ended up with Lots of previous gen MiGs and SUs, including Frogfoot, MiG25, 27 and 29. I seem to recall some transports and helos too.

Iraq flew a lot of their MiGs and SUs to Iran in '91, which Iran grabbed and never gave back.
APG63 is offline   Reply
Old 7th Dec 2011, 12:34   #237 (permalink)
HTB
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Over the hill (and far away)
Posts: 242
That'll be Iran's high tech modern air force then....and we were quite happy for them to be somewhere other than Iraq in '91.

Alone, unarmed and unafraid - our biggest threat was the USN's F14, who seemd determined to shoot anything that was airborne. Sorry drifting a bit.

Mister B
HTB is offline   Reply
Old 7th Dec 2011, 13:10   #238 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK and where I'm sent!
Posts: 372
Yes, Mister B. They've got a lot of helos. Actually they have quite a lot of FJ airframes, but a lot are wrecks. Also, remember that Iran is a massive country with only 14 Tactical Air Bases (and some auxilliary airfields). So not much in the way of contemporary air and a huge chunk of airspace to cover.

Radar is another problem. Again a big space to cover. I don't think I can report any AWACS, athough there was talk about getting one from Russia - don't think it happened. Possibly a VHF, anti-stealth radar, but how much can one cover?

Thinking about SAMs, long range systems are located through the centre of the country and in the West - SA2 and SA5. Tactical systems are positioned, as you would expect, around strategic and population centres - mainly S200 and Hawk (yes, US sold them, they've kept them going).

There are one or two modern things, but...

That'll be Iran's high tech modern air force then.
Mach Two is offline   Reply
Old 7th Dec 2011, 13:56   #239 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Malkin Tower
Posts: 850
had an interesting experience a few years back, flying Swissair to Bombay overnight.
The cabin crew had insisted we pull down the blinds, but a bit later I lifted mine. As we crossed the border into Iran an F-14 passed directly over our starboard wing, in the reverse direction. At a best guess 20 feet above, 70 feet away from the fuselage. The Swissair pilot didn't flinch and our flight continued with no change in direction.
Next morning as we left I asked one of the pilots about it. He totally denied it had happened
jamesdevice is offline   Reply
Old 7th Dec 2011, 13:59   #240 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK and where I'm sent!
Posts: 372
Man, that drinks service is good on Swiss!
Mach Two is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 00:53.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".