PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Military Aircrew
Reload this Page Prime Minister suggests the Navy to get one carrier
Forgotten your Username/Password?
Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Military Aircrew A forum for the professionals who fly the non-civilian hardware, and the backroom boys and girls without whom nothing would leave the ground. Army, Navy and Airforces of the World, all equally welcome here.


Reply
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 5th July 2009, 11:23   #21 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 28
How long was the design life of "Ocean"..not as long as she'll be in the water.
How long was the design life of Type 23's not as long as the extension to life that's just been applied.
How long was the design life ofbatch 3 Type 22'S not as long as they've been in the water and why they are rotten.

Anyway according to "The Times" senior civil servents are looking for a 20% cut in budgets across the board. Suppose we'll have no Aircrew left after "Flying pay" is reduced by 20%....We willl not need one carrier
jim2673 is offline   Reply
Old 5th July 2009, 11:32   #22 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Doncaster, S. Yorks.
Age: 23
Posts: 45
Why would we only have one carrier after Queen Elizabeth is built? Is it planned to retire both Illustrious and Invincible upon completion of the first new carrier?
The Heff is offline   Reply
Reply
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:20.

Privacy Policy - Terms and Conditions - Contact Us - PPRuNe Home - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2009 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".