Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Middle East
Reload this Page >

EK pilots 3 man MLE etc

Wikiposts
Search
Middle East Many expats still flying in Knoteetingham. Regional issues can be discussed here.

EK pilots 3 man MLE etc

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Mar 2015, 15:11
  #41 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: bahamas
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Glofish,
you are wrong. Those flights are not, I repeat not variation 1 flights. If it was then it would show on your roster. It does not. I went to the third floor to regulatory affairs, and asked. Repeat. Not variation 1. Please go ask .
thatwasclose is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2015, 19:59
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: earth
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, the answer on the FSW is the following:

(i know we should not publish internas. But this is discussed ad infinitum and basically it's a procedure and no names are involved. To clarify what is out there, and this is a matter of safety, i only copy the answer)

"The flight can be operated within a variation of the flight time limitation using a two man crew only. The third crew member on these night turn-around operations have been added after consideration by the XXX, to improve operating crew member alertness through in-flight relief. They have not been added to extend the flight time limitations and if captain’s discretion to extend the flight duty period for 2 man crew has been used, it must be reported."

The way i interpret it, is that the flights "can" be operated with a variation.
glofish is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2015, 11:35
  #43 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: bahamas
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They can be, but they are not. And if they are not is this legal? The author of this response is giving a different response from regulatory affairs. The fleet facts december says a different thing.

I know that we let things slide if its a hassle. The company does no favours for us
anymore. We are doing ourselves no favours here as professional pilots to let the company make us operate under such hazy circumstances. Clarity is needed. I for one think the flights are much better this way, but I i still want to make sure that I am operating in a legal manner. Do we not all want that?
thatwasclose is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2015, 16:01
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Dessert
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't get why they made TRV 3 pilots. I had to AUG that flight twice being 520... terrible.
tom330 is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2015, 07:12
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Dubai
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TRV

These flights are not operated to Variation 1. case in point the rest required before the variation (Nights rest) which is definitely not the case on the 330 fleet to TRV. Planned duty 11 hours. Max duty 10 hrs 15 min. (extension from variation 1 is only 30 min). The only way to extend the duty is with augmentation 1hr if the operating pilots receive 3 hrs rest (not consecutive) which means a change in seats during climb and descent ( above FL 200) doable on paper but not in reality.
Discretion is a quagmire! can you exercise it if you are planned to exceed duty?. I would think not.
Yahooza is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.