Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Medical & Health
Reload this Page >

VISION THREAD (other than colour vision)

Medical & Health News and debate about medical and health issues as they relate to aircrews and aviation. Any information gleaned from this forum MUST be backed up by consulting your state-registered health professional or AME. Due to advertising legislation in various jurisdictions, endorsements of individual practitioners is not permitted.

VISION THREAD (other than colour vision)

Old 1st Mar 2010, 12:40
  #1501 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: London
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pre-LASIK refraction limits

Hi all,
I'm wondering if anyone can help me with this...

I've had a UK class 2 medical for about 10 years, & had LASIK surgery a few months ago. My eyesight is now more or less perfect, & I'll have no problem passing any eyesight tests for a renewal.

However, I'm a bit concerned about the CAA stating that the pre-LASIK prescription must not be worse than +5. My pre-LASIK prescription was approx +6 in both eyes, which would not pass an initial class 2 medical, but would pass a renewal as there are no limits on refraction for renewals (my eyes were better than +5 for my initial medical 10 years ago but deteriorated slightly over the years).

So my question is - can anyone confirm that the pre-LASIK-prescription limits only apply to initial medical exams, and not to existing class-2 medical holders? The CAA don't make this clear on their website.

Thanks in advance,
John
johnuk is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2010, 19:55
  #1502 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Up north
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
John,

Before I open my mouth, can I just check.

Your prescrition is definately + not -?
Creep Feed Grinder is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2010, 07:13
  #1503 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: London
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, my prescription *was* +, not -.
My eyes were approx +5.50 & +6.00.
They are now both approx 0.
johnuk is offline  
Old 11th Mar 2010, 03:23
  #1504 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: somewhere hot and sticky
Age: 44
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Corneal Refractive Therapy

Hi,

Does anyone have any experience with corneal refractive therapy lenses? Are they able to be used in aviation - when your medical may state "must wear corrective lenses"?

They sound like an ideal solution to me, but I've never acutally known anyone to use them.

Cheers
Dupre is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2010, 16:44
  #1505 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Up north
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Johnuk,

Sorry for the delayed response.

Your Hyperopia was higher than normaly considered for Lasik. This may be of concern to the CAA.

There is no Myopic limit for Class 2 renewal but the +5.00 limit for Hyperopia remains, so you shouldn't even have a Class 2. I'd take comfort in this.

The pre-LASIK-prescription limits apply to initial medical exams; disregard your existing Class 2.

My suggestion would be to write to the CAA and ask them.

In my similar case, got a reply within 8 weeks. Your Class 2 and PPL are in your favour. Do lots of research - especially EASA, JAR & the deviation route.

Good Luck
Creep Feed Grinder is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2010, 21:41
  #1506 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Castleford (near Leeds)
Age: 30
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Need assurance for my vision.
Do I fall in the boundaries for the Class 1 Medical.

Test results are from today: -

Left: 6/5

Right: 6/6

Both together : 6/5
jakeekaj is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2010, 20:02
  #1507 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Blue Marble
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Contact lenses

Hi All,

Why do the medical requirements specify that contact lenses can only be used to correct distant vision and not also near vision?
Firewalled is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2010, 20:22
  #1508 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: THE BLUEBIRD CAFE
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Contact lenses are fine for most myopes (short sighted) as they can usually accommodate to focus close up when wearing the correction. These are concave lenses with, if needed, cylinder to correct for any astigmatism.

With hypermetropes (long sighted) it is quite different. The convex lens corrects properly for close work put it will not allow the wearer to focus on more distant objects. Next time you are in the chemists put on any pair of reading glasses off the rack and check your distance vision, how blurred it is. That is the equivalent of trying to see through a contact lense of any positive power, i.e. convex.
Fantome is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2010, 20:51
  #1509 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Blue Marble
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fantome,

Thanks for your reply

I am a hypermetrope with +4 left and +5 right. I've always worn glasses and had no problems with clear near, intermediate and distant vision.

So if i wear contact lenses with these powers how will they not allow me to focus on distant objects? this is what im finding a little bit strange.

Firewalled is offline  
Old 13th Apr 2010, 18:01
  #1510 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: THE BLUEBIRD CAFE
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Guess your best bet is to talk to a few optometrists and see if they give you consistent explanations. Such advice should be freely given.
Fantome is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2010, 18:46
  #1511 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: U.K
Age: 41
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Contact lenses are not permitted for near vision only since you will lose the ability to focus in the distance. This mainly affects people aged over 40.

A pre-presbyope has the ability to focus in the distance, near and intermediate and therefore will not have any problems. A presbyope (difficulty with near vision) struggles to adjust there vision for near. By using contact lenses JUST for near, the instrument panel will look nice an clear but the pilot will stuggle to see the runway.

I hope this helps
Sable Knight is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2010, 13:13
  #1512 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Blue Marble
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Sable Knight!
Firewalled is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2010, 16:45
  #1513 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Edinburgh, UK
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Eyesight

Hi everyone,

Wonder if someone could explain... I know the regs on the Class 1 but I have no idea how to decipher my prescription. What is the numbers I'm meant to be looking at that are meant to be in the +5 range?

Thanks in advance!
rodoc is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2010, 10:54
  #1514 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: A long way from home
Age: 44
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The unit you're looking for is Dioptres (dpt for short)
Dioptre - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
welliewanger is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2010, 19:07
  #1515 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Edinburgh
Age: 37
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rodoc,

I took the guidelines into a very well known opticians in Leith. The opticians partner was a Pilot and had no problem checking against the guidelines for me and didnt expect any extra payment.

You get free eye tests in Scotland so may as well use it!
copywrite33 is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2010, 10:03
  #1516 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Edinburgh, UK
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Eyesight

Thanks for the info! I am going to the optitions tomorrow for an eye test, I will take the requirements away with me and see what he says.

I'm very sure that you will all know this, the wording of the JAR Class 1 is: 'If you need correction the refractive error (the amount of correction) must not exceed +5.00 dioptres of long sight or -6.00 dioptres of short sight. This is in the most ametropic meridian (taking into account any astigmatism).'

The bit I don't understand is 'taking into account any astigmatism'. Does this mean I have to add the numbers on my prescription?

Thanks,
rodoc
rodoc is offline  
Old 2nd May 2010, 16:56
  #1517 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: London UK
Posts: 530
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The bit I don't understand is 'taking into account any astigmatism'. Does this mean I have to add the numbers on my prescription?
That's right.
Dr Jekyll is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 11:56
  #1518 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Northern Ireland
Age: 40
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Class 1 Medical Advice - Visual Standards

Hi folks, this is my first post and I am just looking for any advice from those that know more

Im 26 and looking into flight school, have not yet decided what route to take, but one aspect that is frying my head are the Visual Standards for the Class 1 Medical certification.

They say that its ok if your refractive error does not exceed +5 or -6 dioptres and that any astigmatism must not exceed 2 dioptres.

I have had my eyes checked recently and they are as below

SPH CYL AXIS
Reye (-3.75) (-1.8) (2)
Leye (-3.75) (-1) (9)

As I understand it, my eyesight is acceptable to obtain a class 1 Medical. (I took the standards to my optician)

I am worried that because my astigmatism in my right eye is very close to 2 dioptres that in a few years I may fail the medical, but then I found out that Class 1 renewals do not have any limits on refractive error or astigmatism after the initial medical has been obtained (Is this definately correct?)

My dilemma is that I have been looking at getting LASIK Wavefront surgery for quite a while and really want to get it done, not just for flying but for every other reason that people who needs glasses have. It says in the standards that I can obtain a medical as long as I wait 3 months after the surgery and obtain all the relavant post-op checks.

But Im worried as a tiny % of surgeries can go wrong (0.1%) and I dont want to ruin any chance I may have of becoming a pilot... I really want to get this surgery done and im thinking two things:-

- I dont know if it would be better to go and obtain the medical now, with my eyes as they are, and after that do the surgery (voiding the medical) as then I would only be required to renew? Sounds like it might be safer cause I have the initial medical at least

- or should I just get the surgery and prey for the best?

I have been deliberating about this for weeks as I had my eye surgery consultation and I just need to decide...

Any help or advice would be deeply appreciated

Thanks very much
Sharmanat0r is offline  
Old 15th May 2010, 18:32
  #1519 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: In the thoughts of who loves me
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Eyesight limits and CASA

Hi boys,
are there any eyesight limitation with CASA in Australia, or is it like the FAA where is needed only to see 20/20 with correction?

Thanks in advance!!!
Jerry Lee is offline  
Old 16th May 2010, 09:17
  #1520 (permalink)  
Jazzy78910
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Might be better asked in the Medical or Dunnunda sections, but corrected 20/20 is fine.

I'm pretty sure actually, that you don't even need 20/20 for the class 1 medical, but only close to...
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.