PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Medical & Health
Forgotten your Username/Password?
Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Medical & Health News and debate about medical and health issues as they relate to aircrews and aviation. Any information gleaned from this forum MUST be backed up by consulting your state-registered health professional or AME.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2nd August 2005, 13:21   #41 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: gon'surfin:-) again
Age: 44
Posts: 1,446
Poundstretcher- £2.99

No less effective in preventing eye damage than any others.
gingernut is online now   Reply
Old 3rd August 2005, 18:54   #42 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Glorious West Sussex
Age: 94
Posts: 568
Gingernut

I've always been wary of cheap sunglasses - your iris opens wider with shades on, and if the lenses are not very good at blocking the UV rays then you can get serious eye damage (over the long term). It is well worth paying for good lenses.

Cheers, TP
TyroPicard is offline   Reply
Old 3rd August 2005, 19:36   #43 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 195
Randolph Engineering, Concorde Model with the grey/green lenses. Imho colors look very natural. I neither like the greenish color feel of Ray Bans nor the reddish one of Serengetis.

Oh and the other day, I was using my EUR 4 sunclasses from the discounter. Seemed to work almost as good. They have this 400% UV protection as well.
wondering is offline   Reply
Old 4th August 2005, 10:16   #44 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: gon'surfin:-) again
Age: 44
Posts: 1,446
Quote:
It is well worth paying for good lenses.

Sorry, not an expert, but is price related to protection ? Seem to remember some UK consumer study from years back suggesting that it is not.

Cheers
gingernut is online now   Reply
Old 4th August 2005, 14:36   #45 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 153
Oakley Minutes fitted with a black iradium lens, you will never look back. Oakleys best UV protection, very light, covers the whole field of vision and fits nicely under headset.
stellair is offline   Reply
Old 9th August 2005, 16:41   #46 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Posts: 2
For strong light environments (above cloud layers, ...), we recommend any Julbo (see julbo.fr) sunglasses model with Alti Spectron x6 glasses, it has flash protection and anti-glare, tunes down any excess of light, still allowing to see in high resolution at extreme distances.
benou is offline   Reply
Old 16th August 2005, 14:24   #47 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ireland
Age: 23
Posts: 38
Would these be any good?

http://www.serengeti-eyewear.com/pro...s/humberto.cfm

Whats the difference between drivers and 555NM? Which is better for flying, (helis, not way up in the heavens like some you )

I have rayban predators but after wearing them a while get a little heavy on the nose and start to irritate you.

Thanks
JAF0 is offline   Reply
Old 16th August 2005, 17:54   #48 (permalink)
The Cooler King
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Now in the Desert
Posts: 1,285
I have a new pair of Serengetis that I got as a present!

My other Serengetis are now looking for a new home.
Farrell is offline   Reply
Old 18th August 2005, 13:03   #49 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 1,606
JAF0,

Go for Drivers (or, ideally, Drivers Gradient) lenses. See my post above.

And, FWIW, I also only fly helis.


Regards,

B73


PS Your link didn't work.
Bravo73 is offline   Reply
Old 18th August 2005, 15:35   #50 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ireland
Age: 23
Posts: 38
Thanks Bravo, ill have a look and see what I can get.

these were the ones that the link posted to (dont know why it stopped working)



Model# Frame Color
lens color Size Information:
6852 Henna Drivers Base Curve: 8 Rx
6853 shiny Black Drivers Temple Length: 135mm/Spring Hinges
GG6860* Gunmetal 555nm Lens Size: 51.0 x 29.9 x 52.2mm, DBL 18mm
JAF0 is offline   Reply
Old 21st August 2005, 22:30   #51 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pickle Lake
Age: 32
Posts: 41
Lots of praise for Serengeti's found in this thread.

Rather confusing though since i've read a few articles that say photochromic lenses are not suitable for flying.

From an article on Transport Canada's site:

Quote:
Photochromic lenses that darken with increasing UV light are good for driving, but polycarbonate aircraft canopies shield out much of the ultraviolet rays and may interfere with their proper darkening. Additionally, going from bright sunlight into cloud the glasses may take several minutes to lighten
From an article by a FAA Vision Research specialist:

Quote:
Glass photochromic lenses (PhotoGray(r) and PhotoBrown(r)) automatically darken when exposed to UV and become lighter in dim light. Most of the darkening takes place in the first 60 seconds, while lightening may take several minutes. Although most photochromic glass lenses can get as dark as regular sunglasses (approximately 20% light transmittance in direct sunlight), their darkened state may be lighter due to the reduced UV exposure through the windscreen. In addition, the faded state of photochromic glass lenses may not be clear enough to be useful when flying in cloud cover or at night.
Fingersmac is offline   Reply
Old 31st August 2005, 01:12   #52 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: KUWAIT
Posts: 18
am not scintfic about this but stay away from polarized lenses for glass cockpit
kaepa is offline   Reply
Old 20th September 2005, 17:57   #53 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: In a nice house
Posts: 853
I find Cebe Athlon ski glasses with brown-orange lenses are fantastic for both keeping the strong sunlight out of my eyes and for the comfort of the frames. The frames are comfy with headset on and also mean that the sunglasses never fall off, whether skiing or flying.
Airbus Girl is offline   Reply
Old 29th September 2005, 16:51   #54 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 32
For those still looking for Serengeti's in the UK - as has been said, Sunglass Hut no longer stock them.

If you google it, you'll find shadesaver.com and you can get them shipped from the US.

The ones I just ordered were $109 + p&p which was about $50 cheaper than the serengeti website. Seems like a good deal.
oojamaflip is offline   Reply
Old 30th September 2005, 15:31   #55 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 41
Cloudmaster are a very good make, relaxing on the eye, and give a good contrast to clouds. Cheaper than Serengeti, but the lens are prone to scatches. Avaliable from AFE in the UK, along with Serengeti's
kestrel539 is offline   Reply
Old 1st October 2005, 15:17   #56 (permalink)
Rubençito
 
Posts: n/a
I swear silouette sunglasses since 1 year,they're extremely lightweight,clear lenses in all wx conditions,I camefrom oakleys but those seems good
  Reply
Old 21st October 2005, 16:50   #57 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pickle Lake
Age: 32
Posts: 41
Fingersmac, you are welcome to give an opinion, or refer readers to further information. A post that only contains a link to a commercial site is not acceptable.

Cheers, BM

Last edited by Bad medicine : 23rd October 2005 at 13:11.
Fingersmac is offline   Reply
Old 16th November 2005, 08:19   #58 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sg
Posts: 40
can anyone clarify, whether polarised sunglasses are allowed in the cockpit while flying?

looking to buy a pair to start my flying soon, and would like to know whether to pay a difference of 100 for the polarised lenses
Terryble is offline   Reply
Old 16th November 2005, 09:14   #59 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Delhi
Posts: 72
I would not advise Polarisd glasses. One one flight I found that I could not read the FMS panel at all and the EADI/EHSI also appeared very strange. It so turned out that the FMS Panel has horizontal lines which were illuminated and my glasses let in only vertical light hence the inability to read the displays. The ac is ATR
teghjeet is offline   Reply
Old 16th November 2005, 10:49   #60 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sg
Posts: 40
teghjeet : Thanks for your advice. I guess I would be better off with a pair of non-polarised then...
Terryble is offline   Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:01.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2009 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".