Originally Posted by SASless
how does that compare to Bill Clinton, Anthony Weiner, and a host of Liberals?
I am at a loss to understand the mindset behind this continued line of spurious argument.
1. There is a massive difference between consensual acts between adults, and unsolicited sexual assault or harassment. The first one may or may not be a moral issue depending on relationship status; the second is...umm...ILLEGAL! You were a law enforcement officer and you can't tell the difference?
2. Let's just alter history and theorise that Clinton actually sexually assaulted Lewinski. Are you suggesting that makes O'Reillys alleged behaviour acceptable? I've never heard of the 'well, he did it so I can too' defence standing up too well in a courtroom..
Some people around here are in desperate need of a compass swing tbh