PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Social > Jet Blast
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Jet Blast Topics that don't fit the other forums. Rules of Engagement apply.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 6th Oct 2012, 22:26   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 224
Boris Johnson and his aviation expert!

It is amazing to me that anybody thinks that the overarching ego that is Boris Johnson is fit to be or could be a British PM.

His personal fixation with a new airport hub in the estuary to the east of London might be worthy of consideration, if only for the novelty factor, but the turdulent thinking of his some of his spokespeople makes it clear that he is badly advised and in fact is probably more interested in the scheme for his own political ends rather than the good of the future of British civil aviation, British industry as a whole and the travelling British public.

Heathrow could shrink to one runway to fund new hub airport - Telegraph

Quote:
Heathrow could be shrunk to a one-runway airport, with the proceeds from redeveloping the site used to partly fund a new £50bn hub to the east of London, according to the London Mayor's aviation adviser.
I don't know what the mayor and his aviation expert are smoking but it stinks more than the mud in the estuary I think...

Why Willie Walsh even gives credibility to all this baloney by talking about the closure of Heathrow is just beyond me. Perhaps he needs a rest in small Swiss clinic as well.

What with the ongoing rail fiasco it seems that any sensible discourse or transport strategy is beyond not only the politicians but also beyond senior transport executives as well.

Quote:
"If Heathrow were a smaller airport that could potentially operate with one runway and with fewer terminal facilities, then part of the site becomes available for development," he said. "You could also bring in services that are now at Northolt and free that up for development. It's a large site adjacent to the A40 – there must be value in that."
It isn't April the 1st is it? Am I missing something or have I become stuck in the mud as well?

Caco

Last edited by Cacophonix; 6th Oct 2012 at 22:29.
Cacophonix is offline   Reply
Old 7th Oct 2012, 00:55   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: .
Posts: 2,002
I suspect that any problem lies within the passenger forecasting and modelling unit of TfL - and that is where any bad advice originates.

For example: A mole once told me that the mathematical modelling used by TfL to predict passenger growth on the railway and tube is fatally flawed. But because its the brainchild - and sacred cow - of the guy in charge of the department, nothing can be changed until he retires or dies.
A valid alternative model is available, but can't be used until he goes.
Essentially all London railway planning decisions over the last twenty years or so have been based on invalid passenger forecasts. The problem is known about, but no-one has the political clout to bring the matter to the attention of Boris & Co
Projects said to have been affected are Crossrail, much of the tube stock replacement schemes, the East London line rebuild, the Thameslink upgrade, the Croydon trams and the Docklands light railway.

Of course, all this predates Boris and is a hangover from Red Ken's appointments. Unfortunately Boris didn't have a clearout of staff when he arrived

Last edited by Milo Minderbinder; 7th Oct 2012 at 02:34.
Milo Minderbinder is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:56.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".