PPRuNe Forums


Jet Blast Topics that don't fit the other forums. Rules of Engagement apply.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd May 2012, 15:16   #1 (permalink)
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Brighton
Age: 63
Posts: 8,624
Quantum Gravity Treatment of the Angel Density Problem

Quantum Gravity Treatment of the Angel Density Problem
ORAC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2012, 15:29   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London
Posts: 1,544
Stupid article. Of course Pauli does not apply to angels. What nit-wit ever thought that angels had to have any substance at all?
Ancient Observer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2012, 16:03   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 55
Posts: 211
On the end of a short sharp object!

Ah exclude Pauli from this principle. The last angel I met was called nano and she was a fine particle indeed... or was her name Nina... whatever.. she was a fine angel?


Caco
Cacophonix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2012, 16:16   #4 (permalink)
Just another erk
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Germany
Age: 70
Posts: 280
Sorry about this, but these are the only Angels I know:

Hells Angels MC World
ArthurR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2012, 16:23   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 55
Posts: 211
Arthur R

With your sense of irony, humour and music and I guess you woz always ...



Caco
Cacophonix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2012, 17:36   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Somewhere between E17487 and F75775
Age: 73
Posts: 723
I just read that as "..Treatment of the Anal Density Problem".

The mind boggles thinking about the piles of solutions to that one......
OFSO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2012, 17:52   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London
Posts: 1,544
It would be another crap article.
Ancient Observer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2012, 18:14   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 170
Non angeli sed angli ?
G&T ice n slice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th May 2012, 04:31   #9 (permalink)
Psychophysiological entity
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tweet Rob_Benham Famous author. Well, slightly famous.
Age: 78
Posts: 4,346
Quote:
Dr. Phil Schewe. He suggested that due to quantum gravity space is likely not infinitely divisible beyond the Planck length scale of 10exp-35 meters.

Haven't I been saying this for years? Kah! I only people would listen.

Dance Dynamics is just plain wrong. The Quantum points of reference might well be entered as a datum reference, but the electro-dynamic factors would require a frame of reference, and I propose angels are exempt from this requirement.

Last edited by Loose rivets; 4th May 2012 at 16:57.
Loose rivets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th May 2012, 11:19   #10 (permalink)
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Brighton
Age: 63
Posts: 8,624
Quote:
What nit-wit ever thought that angels had to have any substance at all?
But without mass, how can you have fallen angels?

Quote:
and I propose angles are exempt from this requirement.
But aren't Heaven and Hell just frames of reference rather than actual places?
ORAC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th May 2012, 11:35   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 55
Posts: 211
Do angels have a dual nature? Is an angel a wave or a particle?

I think we should be told.

Caco
Cacophonix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th May 2012, 12:35   #12 (permalink)

ThRedBearOne
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Where my heart is.
Posts: 602
Quote:
Is an angel a wave or a particle?
No, just a sine of the time!
ThreadBaron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th May 2012, 13:00   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: south of Cirencester, north of Lyneham
Age: 70
Posts: 1,234
That response is a bit of a cosh.
radeng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th May 2012, 13:04   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London
Posts: 1,544
"fallen angels" indeed. No such thing.

When I was younger, and targetted nicely shaped pretty angels, it became clear once they had fallen that they had never been angels.

Once I got married, I had a paradigm shift. Now I have two young angels of my own, I can't stand their boyfriends, just in case they are like I was. (How's that for bad English?)
Ancient Observer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th May 2012, 16:59   #15 (permalink)
Psychophysiological entity
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tweet Rob_Benham Famous author. Well, slightly famous.
Age: 78
Posts: 4,346
You could have said, Like what I was.


Nobody picked me up on my angles angels thingie. Never seem to filter out that hiccup in me brain's word department.
Loose rivets is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 19:34.


1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1