PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Social > Jet Blast
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Jet Blast Topics that don't fit the other forums. Rules of Engagement apply.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 21st Jan 2011, 05:19   #1 (permalink)
Thought police antagonist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: A civilised little County..with a bit of eccentricity to boot
Posts: 675
Quaint legal term for poisoning

I like the term "with intent to annoy ".....I think most people would be annoyed if they were offered screenwash in a drink....

Just wondering if the term can be applied to any other crimes however. "Intent to annoy" would seem to cover quite a broad spectrum after all.


BBC News - Nanny in court on Ann Summers boss poison charge
Krystal n chips is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jan 2011, 05:40   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,083
Krystal

Actually, a bit of Google suggest's there's much broader scope to that piece of legislation...

Quote:
Maliciously administering poison, with intent to injure, aggrieve, or annoy any other person.
So it looks like "to annoy" is the least strong of the available options to the judge.
mixture is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jan 2011, 07:03   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,428
"annoy" has undoubtedly been judicially defined and may have a broader legal interpretation than the ordinary meaning of the word.
rotornut is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jan 2011, 07:24   #4 (permalink)
Psychophysiological entity
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: A Whilom nimble brain. With 31 million posts.
Age: 73
Posts: 3,381
"Looking at me in a funny way."

"Being in possession of an ugly wife."


Being annoying is a very minor charge by comparison.
Loose rivets is online now   Reply
Old 21st Jan 2011, 08:22   #5 (permalink)
RJM
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Orstralia
Posts: 274
The law has some great phrases. I was involved in the collapse of a boundary wall due to 'the secret and undiscoverable processes of nature'.
RJM is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jan 2011, 09:04   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ex-pat Aussie in the UK
Posts: 2,704
Quote:
"Looking at me in a funny way."

"Being in possession of an ugly wife."
"Offering insufficient bribe" gets you in the most trouble, in my experience
Checkboard is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jan 2011, 09:14   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edinburgh and 3C
Age: 61
Posts: 144
I like the old (but still in use) Scots legal term for burglary - hamesucken.
MagnusP is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jan 2011, 09:30   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: EU
Age: 71
Posts: 4,609
From an Oral Arguments transcript of the United States Supreme Court:

Quote:
And lastly, Your Honors, I've heard our door-to-door activity be referred to as an annoyance to be compared to obnoxious picketing at the home. I respectfully suggest that our activity indeed lies at the heart of the First Amendment.
Obnoxious picketing at the home? Anyone?
RegDep is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jan 2011, 10:05   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southeast U K
Posts: 276
I think that appearing on a TV "Talent" show should be
a Criminal Offence.
Storminnorm is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jan 2011, 11:18   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Garden of England
Age: 74
Posts: 151
Would these charges come under "Intent to Annoy"?

603DX is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jan 2011, 12:04   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Somewhere between E17487 and F75775
Posts: 514
I love the term that was used on death warrents in the Middle Ages - for guilty parties about to be hung, the abbreviation "SUSP" for "to be suspended" was used.

Mind you in the Middle Ages this was probably also known as 'getting off lightly' - compared with some other punishments.
OFSO is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jan 2011, 17:43   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,428
The Criminal Code of Canada contains the offence of Alarming Her Majesty :

49. Every one who wilfully, in the presence of Her Majesty,
(a) does an act with intent to alarm Her Majesty or to break the public peace, or
(b) does an act that is intended or is likely to cause bodily harm to Her Majesty,
is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.
R.S., c. C-34, s. 49.
rotornut is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jan 2011, 17:59   #13 (permalink)
Resident insomniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N54 58 34 W02 01 21
Age: 68
Posts: 1,343
G-CPTN is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jan 2011, 18:14   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,428
Naughty Harry! I wonder what the joke was?
rotornut is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jan 2011, 19:14   #15 (permalink)
I'll mak siccar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Tir nan Og
Posts: 278
Couldn't he share it with HM?
Davaar is online now   Reply
Old 21st Jan 2011, 19:30   #16 (permalink)
Resident insomniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N54 58 34 W02 01 21
Age: 68
Posts: 1,343
I think that he (or Philip) had already 'shared' it by letting one go . . .
G-CPTN is offline   Reply
Old 21st Jan 2011, 20:25   #17 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,428
lol
HM does look a bit alarmed!
rotornut is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:05.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".