PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Supplementary Forums > Jet Blast
Forgotten your Username/Password?
Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Jet Blast Topics that don't fit the other forums. Rules of Engagement apply.


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11th February 2007, 00:37   #21 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Global Vagabond
Posts: 486
Rudi, Hillary, Barack, whatever... just get rid of the current "team" I hope the resultant hangover will prevent such disasters from happening again.
mini is offline  
Old 11th February 2007, 01:05   #22 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Newcastle/UK
Posts: 1,124
Watched it,the chap throws a good speech but that don't mean squat,so does our Tone,long on promise as per, but when he plonks his arse behind that desk nothing evaporates swifter than promises,twas ever thus.
.

Last edited by tony draper : 11th February 2007 at 02:09.
tony draper is online now  
Old 11th February 2007, 01:53   #23 (permalink)
Silly Old Git
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: saiba spes
Posts: 3,028
What about Arnie ?
Good genes there.
tinpis is offline  
Old 11th February 2007, 02:03   #24 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: No one's home...
Age: 64
Posts: 386
Hillary and Barack are both media creations. She has passed no legislation worthy of note and has danced better than John Kerry on positions. She voted for the war but says IF she had been President she wouldn't have gone to war. Huh?

Obama is all sizzle and no meat. No experience except he speaks well and he appeases the far left. He has said nothing of substance to date except he wouldn't do things the way they have been done.. yet he has no track record to prove he would do anything.

Unfortunately, most Americans vote on feelings and not on facts so it will be a horse race for 08. The only comforting thing will be watching them beat the crap out of each other trying out out-left each other and out "I'm NOT GEORGE" each other.

And then you have the Breck girl, John Edwards, he of perfect hair and the Jimmy Carter smile. "Two Americas" is his pluralistic pandering while he sits in his new 20,000+ sqft almost $5 million home. In case no one remembers, Jimmy was the guy who sat on his thumbs for more than 400 days while the Iranians held the US hostage, he presided over an economy with interest rates of close to 20% and he striped the military of the money for any spare parts.. but he had a nice smile and admitted he had once lusted in his heart.

You gotta love American politics...
wileydog3 is offline  
Old 11th February 2007, 02:19   #25 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 67
Posts: 2,795
Both Hillary and Barack are populist - meaning their only principles are
1) getting nominated
2) getting elected.

Once elected, only #2 will apply.
barit1 is offline  
Old 11th February 2007, 03:32   #26 (permalink)
Trash du Blanc
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: KBHM
Posts: 723
WOO HOO!! I get to post a linky to snopes!!!

http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/muslim.asp

Obama was not and never was a muslim. He is a professing Christian and a reliable attendee of a Church of Christ congregation. (Those not familiar with denominational nuance - C of C is moderately bible-thumping.)

A school he attended for a little while in his childhood was predominantly Muslim. That is all. My schools were predominantly Baptist, but that didn't affect me (beer swilling backslid Methodist here)....
Huck is offline  
Old 11th February 2007, 05:45   #27 (permalink)
Lupus Domesticus
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Federal Republic of South Zealand
Posts: 498
Arnie can't stand because he wasn't born in the US.

If there's a God, and America both wants and is due a good President, let it be John McCain.

Colin Powell could have, and probably should have, been America's first black President, and history would have recorded him as being one of the better ones. But someone would have shot him for being black, and the same will happen to Obama, should opportunity present.

Hillary....no, America isn't any more ready for a woman President than for a black President, and even if it were, she wouldn't be the right person. She's too shallow and self-interested and out of touch. Condi would be a far better and more competent pick.
BlueWolf is offline  
Old 11th February 2007, 17:12   #28 (permalink)
Gatvol
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: KLAS/TIST/FAJS (KIFP Work)
Posts: 4,146
"Condi would be a far better and more competent pick."

Be real the only things she picked recently was the Colts to win the Super Bowl or her nose. Lots of brains no intelligence.
B Sousa is offline  
Old 11th February 2007, 17:24   #29 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: orbital
Posts: 183
Hillary will be the next president.
Re-entry is offline  
Old 11th February 2007, 17:25   #30 (permalink)

Just Binos
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Mackay, Australia
Age: 56
Posts: 1,404
You prepared to put money on that, re-entry? Tell me what odds you are after.
Binoculars is offline  
Old 11th February 2007, 17:41   #31 (permalink)

Cool as a moosp
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 628
Blue wolf I fear you are correct. It never made the mainstream media but there was, let us call it, "concensus insider rumour" that Colin Powell realised that there are still enough lunatic white supremacists with a gun to make it unlikely that a black president would make a second term.

I hope America has moved on. A country where you have to think of your safety before standing for president is less than a democracy.
moosp is offline  
Old 11th February 2007, 17:41   #32 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chicago USA
Posts: 20
hes got my vote, because Im from Illinois as well. The presidency/political system here is a joke. More people vote for American idol then they do for the president. Look at bush, how does a failure in school ex coke head alcki become president? And also what’s going on in California with the governator? Barack can at least pronounce his words right when he speaks, he’s already got a one-up on the current guy.
ChicagoHeights is offline  
Old 11th February 2007, 17:50   #33 (permalink)
brickhistory
 
Posts: n/a
I believe the next President will be a Democrat.

With the exception of Bush the elder following Reagan's two terms (and NOBODY wanted Dukakis in that election, including the Democrats),
Americans seem to grow tired of one party after 8 years in the White House.

Powell would be tied to the run-up to the Iraq war. Rice is definitely stuck with it, so I don't believe they'd run or have a chance in hell if they did.

McCain can probably win the nomination, but referring to the trend above, I believe it will be moot. Romney is a long shot; Guiliani can't win the nomination due to his social positions and the Republican base's. (I disagree with him on gun control, for example. I agree with him on other issues. I do think he'd be effective as the Chief Executive however.)

For the Democrats - Obama will not get the nod. Some Americans will not vote for him because he's black, some will not because he's seen as not 'black enough,' others will not because he won't raise enough money.

Hillary I hope will not win the nomination, but definitely has the best chance. If that is the case, then the Dems may actually lose the 2008 election. I don't believe women will vote for her in enough numbers, the far left is no longer enamored by her, and the Republicans will become Borg-like in their opposition to her. She will, however, raise the most money (and I was wrong about her winning a Senate seat in NY.)

Again, historically, sitting senators have a terrible track record at winning the White House. Last one was JFK and his oppostion was Richard Nixon, whom he defeated by only a whisker.

Richardson is my prediction for winning the Democratic nomination and then the whole enchilada (pun intended.).

I also am already SO tired of the whole thing. I wish we'd pass a 'no campaigning until 6 months out' law here.

Last edited by brickhistory : 11th February 2007 at 20:44. Reason: punctuation
 
Old 11th February 2007, 18:19   #34 (permalink)

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 62
Posts: 1,423
Quote:
I wish we'd pass a 'no campaigning until 6 months out' law here.
I could not agree with you more, I'd just add term limits as well for all elected offices, not just for the President.

(I'm afraid you may be right about Guliani.)
con-pilot is offline  
Old 11th February 2007, 19:38   #35 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 1,771
If we must have a Dem...

Bill Richardson, current guv of New Mexico. Don't be surprised to see his name bandied about for a VP position. He would have a strong draw for the Hispanic vote. His moderate views and international experience would make him a good candidate, but he lacks the rock star status afforded the front runners. Ability to raise a million or two a week also in doubt.
West Coast is offline  
Old 11th February 2007, 20:30   #36 (permalink)
Trash du Blanc
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: KBHM
Posts: 723
All points are good, but do not discount the power of Obama to absolutely mesmerize an audience. People will not care about his lack of experience. He practiced a whole lot more law than Hillary - he was a civil rights attorney when she was sitting on Sam Walton's board and making $100,000 scores in futures trading....

I admit it, I'm starting to see the stars line up for this guy. We have racial issues - he's got white and black relatives (he famously said he's got relatives that look like Margaret Thatcher and those that look like Bernie Mac). We have Christian/Muslim issues and he has both of them as relatives as well.

Africa is going to be more and more of an issue in US foreign policy, and when he visits there he's treated like a rock star because of his father.

He's like Tiger Woods - he refuses to be pigeon-holed. He represents the blending of america (our forefathers spoke of the Melting Pot). I, for one, believe it could sell, and I'm a righteous Cracker....
Huck is offline  
Old 11th February 2007, 20:49   #37 (permalink)
brickhistory
 
Posts: n/a
Joining Westie's and Huck's replies together is why I think Richardson will be the bland-ish compromise Democratic candidate. The 'rock star' status of Obama and the Darth Vader evil of Hillary will eventually work against them, I believe.
 
Old 11th February 2007, 21:19   #38 (permalink)
Gatvol
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: KLAS/TIST/FAJS (KIFP Work)
Posts: 4,146
"Look at bush, how does a failure in school ex coke head alcki become president? And also what’s going on in California with the governator? Barack can at least pronounce his words right when he speaks, he’s already got a one-up on the current guy."

"Chicago Heights"??
Lets look at Illinois, specifially Chicago. One of the most corrupt cities, states in U.S. History. And continues to be so. Dont even hold that state up as a role model for anything other than crooks. They could teach lousyianna a lesson or two. I dont think Canada would even take Illinois.
B Sousa is offline  
Old 11th February 2007, 21:29   #39 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: 03 ACE
Posts: 547
Is the fat ugly dude who wrote Fahrenheit 9/11 planning to stand.

He seemed pretty popular last time I looked.


El Grifo is offline  
Old 11th February 2007, 21:47   #40 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 67
Posts: 2,795
The ugly thing about 99% of politicians is their "for the people" posturing, while turning their back on the oath "to support and defend the Constitution".

How soon we overlook the fact the Constitution is there to defend the people from runaway government!
barit1 is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:41.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2009 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".