PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Freight Dogs
Forgotten your Username/Password?
Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6th November 2009, 09:06   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Close to space
Posts: 398
A330-200F bump

Whats the bump near the nosewheel for?

Photos: Airbus A330-223F Aircraft Pictures | Airliners.net
helldog is offline   Reply
Old 6th November 2009, 09:23   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 2,215
Curious myself, so answer nicked from another site.

The A330 normally has a slight nose down attitude when on the tarmac. Not a problem for passengers, but a bugger when you are handling freight apparently. So the solution is rather than a longer nosewheel strut, to move the mounting point lower for the existing nosewheel, unfortunately that means that it no longer retracts to be flush with the existing airframe - hence the bulged fairing. The quoted height of the freighter is .50cm lower (same tail same fuselage length as the A330-200) due to the fuselage being level.
forget is offline   Reply
Old 6th November 2009, 10:01   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 528
Surely it would be higher
stilton is offline   Reply
Old 6th November 2009, 10:23   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 2,215
Longer nose wheel - lower aft fuselage.
forget is offline   Reply
Old 6th November 2009, 15:51   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Close to space
Posts: 398
forget, thanks for that. Very interesting indeed. I am way to lazy to have reasearched that myself.
helldog is offline   Reply
Old 7th November 2009, 04:53   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 32
first flight YouTube - A330-200F first flight
413X3 is offline   Reply
Old 14th November 2009, 08:20   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 528
Is the height of the Aircraft measured at the lower aft fuselage then..
stilton is offline   Reply
Old 14th November 2009, 12:31   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 2,215
Errrr. No. But as the A330 has a nose down attitude when on the tarmac the whole back end will be lower if you make the nose leg longer. Gerrit?
forget is offline   Reply
Old 19th November 2009, 08:25   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 528
Err, still no.


The standard A330 has a pronounced nose down attitude which I understand is a problem for Cargo loading.


The -F version has a different nose wheel arrangement and modification (with resultant fairing) allowing for a basically level fuselage while on the ground by 'elevating the nose'



If you measure the height of the fuselage at, for example the forward door on the freighter then it is only logical that it would be higher than the passenger version, after all that was the intent of the modification.



I can see that the tail height of the Cargo version will be lower than the passenger version but that was not what was implied.
stilton is offline   Reply
Old 19th November 2009, 08:53   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sweden
Age: 42
Posts: 60
Stilton, what is the highest point on an aircraft? Where would it be logical to measure the height from? Think about it....
Dual ground is offline   Reply
Old 20th November 2009, 05:33   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 528
The original post stated the height of the freighter version is .50cm lower.



Since the modification discussed is to raise the nose of the Aircraft to allow a level attitude on the ground the implication is the forward fuselage is higher which it is !



As you accurately point out 'Dual Ground' the top of the vertical stabiliser is the highest point of the Aircraft and this is lower on the cargo version but not of primary importance to operators.


The higher, level loading height is, it seemed backward to me to mention the lower tail height

Last edited by stilton : 22nd November 2009 at 02:50.
stilton is offline   Reply
Reply
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:37.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2010 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".