Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Freight Dogs
Reload this Page >

Another US B-747 Freighter Fleet Gone

Wikiposts
Search
Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.

Another US B-747 Freighter Fleet Gone

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Apr 2009, 16:55
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: KLAX
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another US B-747 Freighter Fleet Gone

Delta to Ground 14 Freighters


JOC Staff | Apr 21, 2009 5:13PM GMT
The Journal of Commerce Online - News Story

Former Northwest 747 fleet falls victim to rising costs, falling Asia trade


Delta Air Lines will ground its entire fleet of 14 747 freighters as it addresses big losses and a steep decline in cargo business, the airline said Tuesday.
The aircraft, long operated by Northwest Airlines before Northwest merged with Delta late last year, had been a backbone of trans-Pacific shipping and the last substantial freighter operation mounted by any American passenger airline.
Delta said in a report on the first quarter that included a $794 million net loss that it will ground the freighters “due to the fleet’s age and inefficiency.”
The 747-200s had made Northwest the United States’ largest freight carrier among passenger airlines for years, but Delta said in its first quarter report that cargo revenue declined 44 percent from the same quarter a year ago. Delta and Northwest combined counted $331 million in cargo revenue in the first quarter of 2008 and just $185 million this year.
The 747-200s are markedly less fuel efficient and more costly to operate than the newer 747-400s that fill Pacific trade lanes, but Northwest had put off decisions on whether to modernize or scale back the fleet for several years because it was picking up business to and from Asia.
With Asia exports retreating sharply over the past year, however, the diminished demand threw the aircraft into a far harsher operating light.
Cargo traffic at Northwest reported to the U.S. Department of Transportation this year was down 48 percent on Pacific lanes, the heart of the freighter operation.
Delta did not give a timetable for when it will pull the freighters from service.
L-38 is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2009, 17:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Gone from the FL sun to the desert Oasis
Age: 60
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to a lengthy thread on another forum, the freighters will be
gone as of Dec 31, 2009. This is really not a big surprise as they had already announced the ANC pilot base would be closed and that the B742s would not
be transferred over to the new Single operating certificate.
Sleeping Freight Dog is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2009, 06:42
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Planet Earth
Age: 65
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is this due to the loss of the NW contract with DHL to Polar?
nitty-gritty is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2009, 15:48
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Gods Country
Age: 72
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nitty -

According to NWA crews, it was Delta's decision not to convert any -400s (even though I believe that was NWA's original plan when retiring the -200's) and get out of the freighter business. Too much investment for the short term return and the huge drop in NRT cargo.
Best Angle is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2009, 16:00
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: on the move
Age: 54
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thats a shame those old 200's be plying the asian skies for over 20 years, sure they will head to the desert, let hope they get a second life in the next boom!
Flying Mechanic is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2009, 17:02
  #6 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Age: 49
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone know what type of motors are on those -200's. If they are CF6-50's they are likely to get picked up by some operator.
muduckace is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2009, 17:53
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tickawarra
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
7Q Pratts I believe
Yobbo is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2009, 20:33
  #8 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Age: 49
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The "q" was a great motor but I am pretty sure it sucked more fuel than the GE, reliable powerfull motor though.

The Boeing website shows -200's with -7r4's. I have never seen a -200 with a -7r4, only Q's and JT9D-70's (rare).
muduckace is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2009, 20:57
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Gods Country
Age: 72
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Power

The NWA freighters have -7R Pratts. Very much like a "Q"
Best Angle is offline  
Old 26th Apr 2009, 23:18
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tickawarra
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I always thought the 7R4G2 was used on the 300. It is indeed a great engine.
Yobbo is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2009, 00:19
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Southern Air Transport operated one 7R powered 200 and it had more power than the Qs that they had. Both great engines, but the leasing costs are higher than the GE.
Lowrider2 is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2009, 02:06
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Gone from the FL sun to the desert Oasis
Age: 60
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NW bought an ex-Swissair B743 just to put the engines on its Freighters,
it may actually have been 2 aircraft. Thats why they have the 7R4G2s on some of the aircraft.
Sleeping Freight Dog is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2009, 02:55
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Regarding 747-200 freighters, even FedEx long ago discarded theirs, after they purchased FlyingTiger.
It is not surprising that Delta wants to rid themselves of these older airplanes.
Will they be used again?

Doubtful, in my opinion, as the freight market will take quite sometime to recover and....the 747-200 is simply too large for many markets.

747-400 freighter?
These will be in much greater demand on the freight upturn, but even these will be eclipsed eventually by the 777F.
You simply cannot disregard twin engine economics (versus 4-engine) in the longer term.
411A is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2009, 05:54
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have never seen a -200 with a -7r4, only Q's and JT9D-70's (rare).
We operated one -200 with an R motor.
SNS3Guppy is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2009, 13:32
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Regarding 747-200 freighters, even FedEx long ago discarded theirs, after they purchased FlyingTiger.
It is not surprising that Delta wants to rid themselves of these older airplanes.
Will they be used again?

Doubtful, in my opinion, as the freight market will take quite sometime to recover and....the 747-200 is simply too large for many markets.

747-400 freighter?
These will be in much greater demand on the freight upturn, but even these will be eclipsed eventually by the 777F.
You simply cannot disregard twin engine economics (versus 4-engine) in the longer term".

411A,

You might want to call and let the marketing people at Boeing in on your obvious keen insight. I am sure they will re-think the -8 program after your conversation. You show me on paper how you are going to haul 120 tonnes of freight across the pond in a 777F. Can't do it!
Fr8Dog is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2009, 16:43
  #16 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: KLAX
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Other than niche market requirements for nose loaders (such as Atlas), industry trend seems to be moving the other way . . Pax carriers, FedEx, Luffty (Lufthansa Cargo), and others don't agree . . . not even a super big 747f (the scarebus 380f) had found significant demand.
I applaud the 747-8, but also expect that they will prove to be the last of the "two engine on one wing" aviation era. . . . . for profitable quirky economic long haul, expect for the 777f to eventually kick pants.

As for a soon to be freight market recovery. . . . . Other than the progressing population bomb, and with nothing to reverse today's job loss, what magic potion out there will break such a spell?
L-38 is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2009, 18:34
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by L-38
As for a soon to be freight market recovery. . . . . Other than the progressing population bomb, and with nothing to reverse today's job loss, what magic potion out there will break such a spell?
More war.

It's a big business you know.

And those C-5s seem to be used quite sparingly these days.

Govt contracts are easy money.

Welcome to the new economy where we don't produce anything--we just blow it up.

zerozero is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2009, 20:18
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Kalifornia
Age: 56
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I vote that we go to war with Venezuela!!

I don't actually want to blow anything up down there, just occupy the place for a while.

The pros;
It is close to home.
Spanish is easy to learn.
The girls are really hot.
The weather is nice.
We would keep our tax dollars in the Western hemisphere.
Great food and beer.
TimeOnTarget is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2009, 21:58
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: A parallel universe.
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old -200's

Why do Americans never invest in the future by staying up to date fleet wise?

The number of old, fuel guzzling clunkers seen at US airports (both on the freight and pax apron) never seizes to amaze me.
Tank2Engine is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2009, 23:23
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Origae-6
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Because

We are to worried about the next quarter and raiding the employee retirement plans. I thought everyone knew this.
400drvr is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.