PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Freight Dogs
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9th July 2008, 17:22   #1 (permalink)
aseanaero
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The 'Chilli Hut' in Indonesia
Age: 46
Posts: 62
Air Freight - Helicopter Engines - Dangerous Goods ?

Air Freight - Helicopter Engines - Dangerous Goods ?

Hi everyone

I'm looking at air freighting a couple of heli engines from Jakarta to the USA and the UK

The engine going to the UK is a factory overhaul still in packing and dessicant bags

The second engine to the US was recovered from a parted out heli

Both engines have been drained of oil for shipment and haven't flown for 8 to 15 yrs

Now the freight forwarder wants to charge me dangerous goods rates due to the risk of residual oil in the engines

I checked the material data sheets for typical aircraft turbine oil and it says

"Not dangerous for transport under ADR/RID, IMO and IATA/ICAO regulations"

So does this guy have a valid point or his he pulling my chain to pocket the difference between the normal rate and dangerous goods rate ? (this is Indonesia after all ... )

I haven't run across this before as i usually send engines by sea freight and have never had a problem

Last edited by aseanaero : 10th July 2008 at 06:25.

aseanaero is offline  
Reply
Old 9th July 2008, 19:19   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Gone from the FL sun to the desert Oasis
Age: 45
Posts: 151
My past experience tells me that once an engine has been operated,
it is considered a dangerous goods because of the fuel/oil involved
in the operation. How is the freight forwarder going to determine
when was the last time the engine was running?
If you can provide a copy of the regs you quote that state after a specific
time frame a used engine is no longer considered a dangerous good,
then you might have a case. But it is up to the airline receiving the
cargo whether they will accept that.
Sleeping Freight Dog is offline   Reply
Old 9th July 2008, 19:38   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The 'Chilli Hut' in Indonesia
Age: 46
Posts: 62
Thanks Freight Dog

I have a buddy that works for a cargo airline and looking on the net the IATA DGR book seems to be last word so I'll have a read though that and see what I can find

1 engine has never run after an overhaul 15 yrs ago (now calendar timex) and the other last run in 2000
aseanaero is offline   Reply
Old 9th July 2008, 20:31   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: coventry
Age: 45
Posts: 52
dangerous goods

give air atlantic a call at coventry cvt
0523 cov man is offline   Reply
Old 9th July 2008, 23:52   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 18
Quick search of transport canada website suggests that may fall under:
UN3166
"ENGINES, INTERNAL COMBUSTION (FLAMMABLE LIQUID POWERED) including when fitted in machinery or vehicles, regulated by aircraft only "
Class 9

see
Transportation of Dangerous Goods Regulations - Schedule 1
G&T ice n slice is offline   Reply
Old 10th July 2008, 01:14   #6 (permalink)
CR2

Top Dog Mod
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Nuyawrk
Posts: 1,776
If the engine is drained/purged of fuel/oil it is not considered DG. A statement to that effect must be made on the AWB.
__________________
CR2
CR2 is offline   Reply
Old 10th July 2008, 06:19   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The 'Chilli Hut' in Indonesia
Age: 46
Posts: 62
The agent/airline are adament the engines are dangerous goods and have just revised their quote to me

JKT - LHR 250kg was $1,327 now $3,360

As I said this may be a scam where they charge me the DG rate and it actually goes general cargo

It's going by sea freight with a different company I've used before ... $400

Going to buy a copy of the IATA Dangerous Goods manual so I can argue the case better next time

Thanks all
aseanaero is offline   Reply
Old 10th July 2008, 17:43   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 18
You've got a lot of options ex Djakarta

suggest contact a few carriers direct (carriers with own staff, not sales agents)
G&T ice n slice is offline   Reply
Old 11th July 2008, 14:40   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: MIA
Posts: 136
There's a basic standard Purge Certificate floating around.

Plenty of freight agents wanting the business.

They pull this all the time to get more money from the customer!
OldCessna is offline   Reply
Old 11th July 2008, 20:18   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: YVR
Posts: 80
Unless it's brand new - It's a dangerous good. Even after an overhaul and even after the oil and fuel have been drained.
74tweaker is offline   Reply
Old 12th July 2008, 23:56   #11 (permalink)
CR2

Top Dog Mod
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Nuyawrk
Posts: 1,776
74tweaker, that is not correct. Rules changed around 3-4 years ago.
__________________
CR2
CR2 is offline   Reply
Old 30th July 2008, 22:08   #12 (permalink)
minigundiplomat
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Hants
Age: 37
Posts: 454
Bear in mind some helicopter power plants are hydraulically started adding another fluid to the mix.
Would have thought it was covered by UN Class 9.

minigundiplomat is offline  
Reply
Old 31st July 2008, 05:54   #13 (permalink)
lewis272
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: In bed, in Castle Donington
Age: 33
Posts: 4
Hmm tricky one this, the carrier may require some sort of proof the engine has been drained, ie statement that engine has been "Purged", also an idea to add to the description of goods on the airwaybill, "not restricted" as per 8.2.6 of the IATA dangerous goods regulations book. If the purged status cannot be proved, (as pointed out in an earlier posting), it falls under UN3166, Class 9, "Engines internal combustion gas/liquid powered", I am afraid to say.

Cheers, and Best of luck.

lewis272 is offline  
Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dangerous goods A Very Civil Pilot Tech Log 7 27th November 2006 13:58
Dangerous Goods course MineDog Professional Pilot Training (includes ground studies) 5 5th July 2006 20:57
SEP,CRM,Dangerous Goods dynamite dean African Aviation 9 11th February 2006 17:38
Dangerous Goods Course Auscan Rotorheads 5 12th November 2004 06:40
dangerous goods course downwind Dunnunda & Godzone 2 26th October 2001 12:59


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:00.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".