Freight DogsFinally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.
Nose tether is too high tech. We are looking at 3rd world airports. Have not hauled any cargo out of the new airport HKG. Hauled a lot out of the old one and it was always tailstands.
A very large strap wrapped around a pushback tug will work. Correct loading will also work, but I've seen many pictures of airplanes sitting on their tails due to improper loading.
I'm assuming from your handle that you are located in Lome, but I could be wrong. Anyway, if that's the case see if the Atlas ground folks are still there and they can give you the low down on what you need to do.
CR2 pretty much sized it up so I refer to his post. As to tethering the nose gear to a push tug, at most places their a premium and if their sitting in front of your airplane the meter is running.
Location: Gone from the FL sun to the desert Oasis
Age: 45
Posts: 151
"I'm assuming from your handle that you are located in Lome, but I could be wrong. Anyway, if that's the case see if the Atlas ground folks are still there and they can give you the low down on what you need to do."
Just make sure they double check the section on loading oilwell equipment.
Sorry 18 Wheeler, I respectfully disagree. I takes a darned good effort to tip a 74; a L/M's job is to ensure that does not happen.
Tail-stands are rarely used correctly; once installed, there should be someone monitoring the strain-gauge to ensure the tail area is not being over-stressed. The tail-stand should then be adjusted. How often do you see that? What I have seen a couple of times is the tail-stand slip off the "ball", piercing the APU.
More trouble than they're worth. A good loadie is cheaper.
I've seen pictures of jumbos on their tail from improper loading, the most recent in the offic enext to mine. I have also seen a tail stand, but it sure looked like a unwieldy tripod on wheels.
Gotta agree with CR2, there are a lot of aircraft that are trickier to load that don't have the provision for a tail stand.
Follow the procedures and load sequence & you won't tip it. Yes, people make mistakes but isn't that the result of man/machine interface & if you get it that wrong, even a tail stand or nose tether won't stop the aircraft from being grounded.
RT
Last edited by RampTramp : 13th June 2008 at 10:22. Reason: Finger trouble
Used to work for a 747F handler. I understand your problem - some carriers insist on using one when loading heavy lumps. We had 2 tailstands - 1 made by Hydro (http://www.hydro.de/), and 1 Dedienne. Unfortunately I think Dedienne went into liquidation.
If you manage to find one, be warned that it will probably need re-calibrating after transport! Good luck.
I will spend some time on that web site. Got to thinking-if an airport has a specialized piece of equipment like a loader that will reach a B747F, surely they will also have a tailstand. Don't you think?
This aircraft has a placard back by the cargo door that says something about not loading or unloading cargo without a tailstand. I remember some stories back in the days of the GATX door when the tailstand was removed before the door was closed and the tailstand had to be reinstalled before the loadmaster could close the door!
Similar Threads 
Linear Mode
