PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Freight Dogs
Forgotten your Username/Password?
Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14th May 2008, 20:54   #21 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: France
Age: 61
Posts: 344
G-AYIM was rolled out of Air Livery at SEN today with Janes Aviation titles.
Expressflight is offline   Reply
Old 14th May 2008, 23:52   #22 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Up North
Posts: 227
maybe phoenix airlines would have been better??

Or perhaps Phoenix Nights...........Brian Potter Airlines (Jerry, you've broke the bloody door!)

Rgds
The Moss
Ballymoss is offline   Reply
Old 15th May 2008, 14:23   #23 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 67
janes

any photos anywhere of paint job??
straightnotlevel is offline   Reply
Old 15th May 2008, 17:04   #24 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: France
Age: 61
Posts: 344
I don't know of any available photos at the moment, but I'm told by one source it is resplendent in the full colour scheme as shown on the Janes Aviation website, but someone else says that it is all white with titling only! Clarification anyone?

Last edited by Expressflight : 15th May 2008 at 20:30.
Expressflight is offline   Reply
Old 16th May 2008, 14:13   #25 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Liverpool
Age: 53
Posts: 51
maybe

maybe the sound of whinning drats will be heard in Liverpool again?
exloadie is offline   Reply
Old 16th May 2008, 20:44   #26 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 576
drat and double drat
dada is offline   Reply
Old 16th May 2008, 21:01   #27 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 230
with the demise of euromanx,there must be a need for a papers and kippers run once a day ! worth basing a budgie at john lennon ?? maybe not...tough times ahead for for an avgas guzzling 748.can't help thinking that another type might be a better long term option...but who am i to comment.
bermudatriangle is offline   Reply
Old 16th May 2008, 21:10   #28 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Age: 35
Posts: 262
Quote:
tough times ahead for for an avgas guzzling 748
748s are JetA1, so maybe not tough times ahead as you predict
Nearly There is offline   Reply
Old 16th May 2008, 22:38   #29 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 230
fuel is fuel...costs are all the same.....just believe 748's belong in an aviation museum..lots more fuel efficient hulls available.why waste time training crews to operate obselete aircraft?if janes is to compete in the freight market,upto date aircraft are a must.
bermudatriangle is offline   Reply
Old 16th May 2008, 22:59   #30 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Age: 35
Posts: 262
But bear in mind, Janes know the 748 inside out and back to front, have in house engineering, a bloody big stock of spares, 748 type rated crew and bucket loads of experience.
As you say fuel is fuel, but its not only fuel you have to look at here. Surely its more cost effective, especially with a sart up, to work with what you have and reduce costs in other areas as above then why not stick with it, they do there job well for the environment they operate in.
Nearly There is offline   Reply
Old 16th May 2008, 23:09   #31 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: U.K.
Age: 31
Posts: 2,605
There isn't much around to touch the Budgie, especially when you take into account the experience of operating the type.

The only other option is something like an ATR and the hull costs are much higher to start with.

It's not a glamourous machine, but it does do the job. The things that will kill old aircraft off are avionics upgrades.
Say again s l o w l y is offline   Reply
Old 17th May 2008, 00:03   #32 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 230
concerned that post office contracts specify jet/all weather capability...budgie with no autopilot,poor bad weather performance/cat1 etc...just not the machine for the current market...let's face it,it's 40 years old !!!
bermudatriangle is offline   Reply
Old 17th May 2008, 09:03   #33 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: France
Age: 61
Posts: 344
While fuel costs will be greater for any given sector on the 748 than the ATP for example (I believe the former burns around 1100 l/hr and the latter 900 l/hr), the fixed costs will be much lower. For low utilisation contracts or ad hoc work Janes should still be able to offer attractive rates for that reason, plus the fact that they should be able to run a lean, efficient operation given their experience with the type.

I say good luck to them.
Expressflight is offline   Reply
Old 17th May 2008, 11:13   #34 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: uk
Posts: 230
i wish them every success as well,just hope the 748 is a good long term aeroplane.can't help thinking a more modern type would ensure greater flexibility with contracts.
bermudatriangle is offline   Reply
Old 17th May 2008, 12:10   #35 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 432
Pic available on the Skyliner site - all white with large blue titles

http://www.skyliner-aviation.de/view...LC=&picid=4742
SWBKCB is offline   Reply
Old 18th May 2008, 00:35   #36 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 575
748 seems the obvious choice for Janes. Has any idea been made available yet regarding the contracts? Fuel burn in the right area of operation is not a concern, it will be factored in to the contract price, or bought by the charterer. Hull value of near to nil makes for a low bid price, more than equating to a good overall package price.

In the world of express package Ops, the network I work for has down sized a lot of feeder routes to perfectly adequate aircraft types, yet will happily throw a 757 at turboprop routes with only 5 tonne of freight, where CATII/IIIA/B capability required (More to loose than the cost differential)

Find the right contracts and there is (happily) life in the 748 yet.

Never worked for Janes, 748, or Emerald or the 'new' Janes, but had the pleasure of working Ops with the Budgie, it is a great machine. Long may it and Janes continue.
boredcounter is offline   Reply
Old 18th May 2008, 01:33   #37 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: southport
Posts: 40
good luck

i had the pleasue to work with the hs748 for nearly ten years on the ramp at liverpool got to no all the emerlds crew and opps well.,gayim looks good in its new colours good luck in the new venture
supersnake is offline   Reply
Old 19th May 2008, 03:24   #38 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: PPrune nominee 2009!
Posts: 1,145
A 748 burns approx 780kilo's a fuel an hour, but in hindsight we use 800kilo's an hour...
Skystar320 is offline   Reply
Old 19th May 2008, 04:42   #39 (permalink)
Banned... Persona Non Grata
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 132
Quote:
A 748 burns approx 780kilo's a fuel an hour, but in hindsight we use 800kilo's an hour...
Skystar320,
What do you operate?
jungle juice is offline   Reply
Old 19th May 2008, 07:35   #40 (permalink)
Banned... Persona Non Grata
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 132
Skystar320,
Thanks for the answer but I think you are confused!

I saw this thread and was thinking about the HS748 I flew to Vanuatu when it was New Hebrides back in the late 60's.Is this the same aircraft updated and re-engined?
It doesn't seem possible.
jungle juice is offline   Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:41.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2009 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".