Quote:
411,
Yes You are correct but my point was that on other forums you are holding the FAA up as the only (world) authority that we should all follow but then you fly for operator (s!) that avoid every FAA rule that may cost them money. |
Seems you speak with forked tounge, TShirt.
First, its...
then, its...
Quote:
| Regarding your "FAA ops only" comment this is also rubbish! |
Really, you should make up your mind, old boy.
Now, as to...
Quote:
| Avoiding the Axial motion AD is purely financial driven and no other reason - they have had 5 years to accomplish this mod and avoided it |
Entirely correct, and with full RR and regulatory authority compliance, via LOA.
It's called, efficient regulatory approved ops.
We need only look at a few other operators for entirely more obtuse regulatory oversight...bits of engines falling off airplanes at JED, is but one small example.
In fact, after four months of inspections by no less than five regulatory authorities, they all seemed rather impressed with the companies aircraft, and their maintenance state.
Of course, as you undoubtedly know nothing of all this, your comments otherwise are simply unsubstantiated conjecture on your part.
Why should we not be surprised...?
Similar Threads 
So much silence from the typically vocal Arizona Tristar PPRUNER??
Linear Mode
