HK AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL BLOG
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HK AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL BLOG
The HONG KONG AIR TRAFFIC CONTOL ASSOCIATION has created a blog as a means of addressing issues that arise in the HK FIR, to create a better understanding within the aviation industry of current restrictions and procedures.
ON AIR: HKATCA Official Blog
A platform for pilots and fellow ATCOs to communicate. Have a question? Don't hesitate to drop an email to [email protected]. Our technical reps are always happy to answer you!
ON AIR: HKATCA Official Blog
A platform for pilots and fellow ATCOs to communicate. Have a question? Don't hesitate to drop an email to [email protected]. Our technical reps are always happy to answer you!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Points for discussion
The HKATCA has in the recent past conducted airline briefings on suggested practices as the movement rate for HKIA rises. Some points from discussions following those briefings:
1. How Clearance Delivery operates. Many misconceptions most incorrect
2. Start up delays. Never a straight forward issue.
3. Delays from mainland ATC and how they are administered
4. Sequencing traffic on departure to achieve the best overall movement rate or efficiency in en-route airspace
5. R/T: what is necessary and what is wasted air time
6. What ATC can see with our surveillance equipment. That is what information do we already have on each aircraft movement?
7. How aircrew can assist in maximising runway usage on both arrival and departure. Significant gains can be achieved just by understanding the preferred outcome versus current practice
8. Sequencing inbound - the use and application of speed control - landing slot times and how the landing sequence is created
9. At maximum hourly movement rates, the impact of minor or major interruptions and their consequence on holding requirements
10. Stack swapping - being changed from one holding pattern to another
11. The impact of weather - the impact of each crew requiring an individual approach to weather avoidance - what ATC and aircrew can achieve if we have a common understanding
12. Aircrew conduct, entering, taking off, landing and vacating a runway
13. The dramatic impact of overflights on HKIA movements and complexity in the provision of ATC
The HKATCA is endeavouring to conduct a new round of briefings/discussions with Cathay and Dragonair, between line pilots and operational controllers. From those conducted already, the benefits were widely acclaimed by both parties.
If you have any queries on the above or other issues, a suitably qualified person will be assigned to answer, so please use the blog.
1. How Clearance Delivery operates. Many misconceptions most incorrect
2. Start up delays. Never a straight forward issue.
3. Delays from mainland ATC and how they are administered
4. Sequencing traffic on departure to achieve the best overall movement rate or efficiency in en-route airspace
5. R/T: what is necessary and what is wasted air time
6. What ATC can see with our surveillance equipment. That is what information do we already have on each aircraft movement?
7. How aircrew can assist in maximising runway usage on both arrival and departure. Significant gains can be achieved just by understanding the preferred outcome versus current practice
8. Sequencing inbound - the use and application of speed control - landing slot times and how the landing sequence is created
9. At maximum hourly movement rates, the impact of minor or major interruptions and their consequence on holding requirements
10. Stack swapping - being changed from one holding pattern to another
11. The impact of weather - the impact of each crew requiring an individual approach to weather avoidance - what ATC and aircrew can achieve if we have a common understanding
12. Aircrew conduct, entering, taking off, landing and vacating a runway
13. The dramatic impact of overflights on HKIA movements and complexity in the provision of ATC
The HKATCA is endeavouring to conduct a new round of briefings/discussions with Cathay and Dragonair, between line pilots and operational controllers. From those conducted already, the benefits were widely acclaimed by both parties.
If you have any queries on the above or other issues, a suitably qualified person will be assigned to answer, so please use the blog.
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Hongkers
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
swh
Trust me, the name Psycho in HK ATC (and formally Oz military/civilian ATC) is synonymous with exemplary knowledge, passion and dedication to aviation.
Everybody who knows him or recognizes his voice in the Tower knows that he imparts a level of confidence in ATC that his peers look up to.
Good initiative thanks Psycho.
BB
Everybody who knows him or recognizes his voice in the Tower knows that he imparts a level of confidence in ATC that his peers look up to.
Good initiative thanks Psycho.
BB
As a frequent visitor to HKG from Japan, this is a fantastic initiative. A great way to improve things is by good communication and understanding of all the priorities, procedures and problems faced by all involved.
A good initiative but all the 'blogs' in the world, an extra runway and another terminal will not improve the situation much until the 'cousins' up north open up their airspace and remove the 'glass wall'. What happened to the mooted integration of the area's airspace? I was under the impression that we would all be talking to 'Pearl Approach' by now, nearly 17 years after the handover.
The delays I am experiencing on a regular basis, even in Hong Kong's version of 'CAVOK' weather, are concerning, and do not bode well for the coming summer. HKIA's reputation as an efficient and reliable hub may well be under threat due to delays and missed connections.
The delays I am experiencing on a regular basis, even in Hong Kong's version of 'CAVOK' weather, are concerning, and do not bode well for the coming summer. HKIA's reputation as an efficient and reliable hub may well be under threat due to delays and missed connections.
Last edited by Captain Dart; 6th Feb 2014 at 01:53.
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: SK
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
why 250kts and not less when cleared to enter a hold?
why force inbound planes to descend 10nm from DOTMI, "when ready" omitted when no one is crossing the outbound corridor?
why all the "unrestricted"?
why S6C, and not S6A, nevermind the good old slam dunk with "expect track miles" during quiet hours?
why climb "TO" FL? why descend "TO" FL? ("to" added)
why climb "" ft? why descend "" ft? ("to" omitted)
why runway change when wind VBR? creating a huge queue consequently push back delay
why the inefficient push back consequently creating chaotic inbound outbound scenes over the North bays
why would the third runway increase TKOF/LDG movements when the bottleneck is at base leg
why force inbound planes to descend 10nm from DOTMI, "when ready" omitted when no one is crossing the outbound corridor?
why all the "unrestricted"?
why S6C, and not S6A, nevermind the good old slam dunk with "expect track miles" during quiet hours?
why climb "TO" FL? why descend "TO" FL? ("to" added)
why climb "" ft? why descend "" ft? ("to" omitted)
why runway change when wind VBR? creating a huge queue consequently push back delay
why the inefficient push back consequently creating chaotic inbound outbound scenes over the North bays
why would the third runway increase TKOF/LDG movements when the bottleneck is at base leg
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Here
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
why put a link up here that we can't be logged into..... or alternatively, tell me how? Is it just an email address????
I have one though....... Why do Mainland ATC descend us to ridiculously low levels so far out from HK?
I have one though....... Why do Mainland ATC descend us to ridiculously low levels so far out from HK?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HKATC Blog
I'll address this issue and have the necessary information posted shortly.
Then all submissions will be answered publicly on the blog. Some submissions have already been answered privately by email, but that's not the intention. We want the information shared as widely as possible.
The post above has some great points and will be answered in a day or two. They will require some detail. It is precisely by giving our reasoning that it will dispel some of the misconceptions of why we do what we do.
Thanks for posting.
Then all submissions will be answered publicly on the blog. Some submissions have already been answered privately by email, but that's not the intention. We want the information shared as widely as possible.
The post above has some great points and will be answered in a day or two. They will require some detail. It is precisely by giving our reasoning that it will dispel some of the misconceptions of why we do what we do.
Thanks for posting.
It's also in case Colonel Wong wants to fly his MiG copy for 20 minutes; the PLAAF controls most of the country's airspace. This is a happy result for China, as it puts the squeeze on Hong Kong. I note, and sometimes compete with for levels, more and more mainland airliners flying direct to destinations in Australia and elsewhere. Maybe that's why we still don't have 'Pearl Approach' after 17 years.
The new Jebel Ali airport in Dubai will have five parallel runways, has desert weather, their military is under control, and is home to an airline that has embraced the A380. It is noteworthy that Virgin has dropped out of the 'Kangaroo Route' via HKIA.
ATC blogs are laudable, but HKIA has gone as far as it can go unless there are radical changes 'up north', and CX needs to order VLA's 'yesterday'.
The new Jebel Ali airport in Dubai will have five parallel runways, has desert weather, their military is under control, and is home to an airline that has embraced the A380. It is noteworthy that Virgin has dropped out of the 'Kangaroo Route' via HKIA.
ATC blogs are laudable, but HKIA has gone as far as it can go unless there are radical changes 'up north', and CX needs to order VLA's 'yesterday'.
Last edited by Captain Dart; 7th Feb 2014 at 22:58.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: hong kong
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
True Dart, sadly all too true; with the caveat that Colonel Wong doesn't fly his Mig clone in the dark or at 04 dubs in the morning, or presumably in inclement weather for that matter. That comes with the next load of technology that they steal from someone else. Leading me to the conclusion that we are being intentionally f@cked about in order to waste fuel.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Reply to BTC-GC's questions.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: In the land of smog
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ANA has an engine failure reference procedure published for the B767 off r07L and R. This procedure is also applied to single engine missed approaches. Basically, it calls for tracking to Rover or Porpa, as appropriate, then a LEFT turn to a track of 182 degrees
Dragonair, the locally based airline has the identical procedure to yours. In my opinion, if you stand in the tower and survey the standard missed approach track re terrain, there is a genuine low point below that track.
I believe that in the event of an engine out missed approach above maximum landing weight only, the performance engineers would have determined that the standard missed approach climb gradient requirement exceeds the aircraft capability which would by the insistence on this procedure.
Would the right turn really cause an issue?
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Hongkers
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Basically, it calls for tracking to Rover or Porpa, as appropriate, then a LEFT turn to a track of 182 degrees
Would the right turn really cause an issue?
The standard MAP is considered procedurally separated from the 07R SID, even in IMC, but has a climb gradient requirement of 7%.
As you can imagine, if the non-standard MAP to ROVER was commenced unannounced when a departure was just airborne for PORPA, things can get pretty sporting very quickly in IMC with little way out except a lot of finger-crossing.
Certainly if made aware that an engine out missed approach was likely, the departure would be held, as we do in Dependent (or Coordinated, as we call it here) Mode.
Last edited by bekolblockage; 10th Feb 2014 at 07:28.
Join Date: May 2009
Location: HKG
Age: 47
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So the reason we can't reduce to min clean or descend at 500ft/min when told to expect 15 mins holding at a point 50nm away is because the computer gets confused?
Pathetic!
Pathetic!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Hongkers
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pathetic!
Suggest you grab a copy of Crew News from a few months back where the issue of arrival sequencing was dealt with in detail in one of the articles.
To supplement a few of the other topics raised by an earlier poster:
why force inbound planes to descend 10nm from DOTMI, "when ready" omitted when no one is crossing the outbound corridor?
Generally the reason would be due to convergence of A1 traffic at MAGOG at the same level (I'm willing to bet it's when you are normally at F320?). While it may seem the simple solution is just descend the ELATO traffic earlier, often thats not possible due to other traffic and getting you stepped the wrong way would stuff up the sequence.
why all the "unrestricted"?
I think I explained it pretty clearly there.
Its being fixed as we speak but at least 2 AIRAC cycles (56 days) are required for promulgation to the coders.
why S6C, and not S6A, nevermind the good old slam dunk with "expect track miles" during quiet hours?
The "slam dunk" still happens during "quiet' times. I guess thats why you don't see it as much now. With around 1100 flights a day now, there are few "quiet" hours. Besides, the slam dunk probably resulted in the "too high/too fast" and the "yes we can make it/no we can't, can we have an orbit on final?" one too many times for both your and our Managements' liking.
why climb "TO" FL? why descend "TO" FL? ("to" added)
why climb "" ft? why descend "" ft? ("to" omitted)
why climb "" ft? why descend "" ft? ("to" omitted)
There seem to be some who find ambiguilty where there is none.
If you understand the ICAO phraseology and realize that the word "TO" is part of the phrase, you cannot confuse the level given or whether the controller meant TO, TWO or TOO.
why runway change when wind VBR? creating a huge queue consequently push back delay
As for the question on pushbacks- he's the expert on that and really you should be asking AA why they continue to design terminals that cause multiple bays to be blocked when pushbacks occur.
why would the third runway increase TKOF/LDG movements when the bottleneck is at base leg
The aptly named "glass wall" certainly has a terrible effect on efficiency, in terms of handling, but in reality it is not an airport capacity constraint.
Last edited by bekolblockage; 10th Feb 2014 at 22:10.
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With apologies to Francis Ford Cuppola, I love the smell of a slam dunk in the morning.
Wakes you up.
Helps if you can get ZGGG to release you early to VHHK for early descent.
On the other hand on a clear day you can see the crazy airspace design when you are close enough to be on left base for 07L but you are in another FIR at FL210!
Wakes you up.
Helps if you can get ZGGG to release you early to VHHK for early descent.
On the other hand on a clear day you can see the crazy airspace design when you are close enough to be on left base for 07L but you are in another FIR at FL210!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: F370
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Psycho and Bekol,
Thank you for your information here. I (and most of my colleagues I hope) appreciate the work that you guys do to sort us out, given the constraints you have. I look forward to the day when we can be given a time for ELATO or ABBEY a few hours out, and make small adjustments early. Wishful thinking!
I appreciate being informed of a time at fix early, so that I can adjust speed. Alternatively, please assign a transition speed as early as possible because it does take a little time to set up.
I think on the ABBEY arrival TD should be FL110 procedural altitude. But LIMES should be 4500 or above.
I love a slam-dunk in the morning; it is like a big WELCOME mat!
Thank you for your information here. I (and most of my colleagues I hope) appreciate the work that you guys do to sort us out, given the constraints you have. I look forward to the day when we can be given a time for ELATO or ABBEY a few hours out, and make small adjustments early. Wishful thinking!
I appreciate being informed of a time at fix early, so that I can adjust speed. Alternatively, please assign a transition speed as early as possible because it does take a little time to set up.
I think on the ABBEY arrival TD should be FL110 procedural altitude. But LIMES should be 4500 or above.
I love a slam-dunk in the morning; it is like a big WELCOME mat!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
UNIFO, bekolblockage and psychohk, thanks for your post replies, they are an interesting insight to what is going on behind the people we speak to on frequency. Keep up with the replies and good work!