PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 19th May 2009, 07:39   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In your mind.
Posts: 135
CoS08 improvement go through

There you go. Will be interesting to see the breakdown of those that took 08 and those that stayed on 99 by rank.
Rook is offline   Reply
Old 19th May 2009, 08:19   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: mars
Posts: 220
Funny to see RH has changed his tone over the weekend. That's if he actually wrote his latest update. Sounds like those who havent made a selection will be getting a phone call... WTF, dont cx get the hint....

Like ROOK stated; it will be interesting to see the stats by rank. I'm interested to see how many S.Os actually took Cos08.
Humber10 is offline   Reply
Old 19th May 2009, 08:35   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Lion rock bottom
Posts: 178
They would have had a riot on their hands if they hadn't passed the improvements. Good for those that already were on COS08 and those who were close to 55.

I doubt many SOs or 'young' FOs signed up, even though he says that by 2010 most of the pilots will be on 08...
Ex Cathedra is offline   Reply
Old 19th May 2009, 10:52   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: europe
Posts: 204
Management doesn't mention the exact figures regarding how many joined Cos 08, that only can mean a lot didn't..
sisyphos is offline   Reply
Old 19th May 2009, 14:13   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 663
the only way they will have majority of the pilots on cos 08 is if they do 400 commands next year...then they might have 51% majority
Frogman1484 is offline   Reply
Old 20th May 2009, 07:23   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Sai Kungah
Posts: 204
Here are the numbers that are doing the rounds at the moment:

56% of all crew on COS08. Total crew is 2490, so 56% of that is 1395. Assuming that all Captains (937 of them) moved over, that leaves another 458. Of that number, apparently about 300 were already on COS08, so that means that only about 158 (of the available 1252) signed up.

As far as I can tell, that doesn't look like a great victory for CX...
jed_thrust is offline   Reply
Old 20th May 2009, 08:34   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: wherever you go, there you are.
Posts: 687
Quote:
Assuming that all Captains (937 of them) moved over
A lot of the Super B guys would not have taken COS08
Dan Buster is online now   Reply
Old 20th May 2009, 08:37   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 25
End of freighter commands

Now there is an end to freighter commands and as depicted in the latest AoA update "That said, the end to freighter commands is an important achievement." And the fact that the majority ratified this in the AoA vote.

I assume that the freighter commands to commence this year will be canned?
Blutack is offline   Reply
Old 20th May 2009, 08:49   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: wherever you go, there you are.
Posts: 687
Wasn't NR's 'worst case scenario' to have all the Capt's on COS08 and all the FO's on COS99? Isn't that pretty much what we have now? Is this the perfect storm?
Dan Buster is online now   Reply
Old 20th May 2009, 15:32   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Norfolk
Age: 50
Posts: 9
If you read GMA's update 1 May 09 it states that all Freighter slots already allocated will be honoured as well as those that were successfully bid for in the 2007/8 NTC; so although seniority will be used from 1 Jul 09, this will not apply for the next bunch of freighter commands. Good hey?
flatlands744 is offline   Reply
Old 20th May 2009, 23:54   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: 3.5 from TD
Posts: 759
Yeah, and don't forget there is two freakin' years worth of freighter commands left!!

That is how many upgrades the company will go through on the freighter before they start upgrading guys who will get paid passenger pay.

So it is another "broken promise" in my book. Two Years? You know how much stuff can happen in two years? By then, the union will be laying down to COS11, which will transfer all the freighters to Air Hong Kong under the revised scope clause of COS08, so the freighters on B scale thing will then become obsolete.

Not a surprise coming from Cathay, but quite a shocker that our own union backed it.
Sqwak7700 is offline   Reply
Old 21st May 2009, 06:39   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 428
Sqwak, there are 22 freighter commands left to do.
Shame how the truth is nowhere near as sensational as your stories eh?
fire wall is offline   Reply
Old 21st May 2009, 07:46   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 192
22 too many in my humble opinion! they should be pax slots.
treboryelk is offline   Reply
Old 21st May 2009, 08:11   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 255
Fire Wall

At the current rate of commands, that's probably about 2 years worth. Note no "tongue in cheek smiley".
It's unlikely there'll be any new pax commands in that time so we're looking at no "in seniority" commands for a long time.
Loopdeloop is offline   Reply
Old 21st May 2009, 08:37   #15 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 663
Sqwak7700, why are you so worried about our Union lying down, bending over and all the other ways you have described it. Having read some of your past., you have stated many times that you were going to resign from the Union.

Now that the vote has gone through, I hope you act on your threats and leave. That way we don't have to hear how your Union failed your little world.

Maybe after all of this , you should go and join EK where you will have no Union to join, no fees to pay and no Union to bash.
Frogman1484 is offline   Reply
Old 21st May 2009, 08:41   #16 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 11
I don't think we're going to get the company changing their mind on these out of seniority commands but how about getting the aoa to pursue a similar deal to what was done with asl; ie 3 pax cmds for every ftr cmd on the 400. That way we'd get both lists moving. Sure some freighter cmds will get deferred but at the moment so are many pax commands and these guys have been waiting 10 years. It seems in these economic times that the ftr guys are being protected but the pax guys are being left out to dry. we should all share the pain.
LostinAirspace is offline   Reply
Old 21st May 2009, 16:31   #17 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 192
before this economic slow-down and COS 08 my pax command should have come up at the end of this year. god knows when it is now. cant see one single reason why early freighter commands should take priority over pax commands other than it saves the company more money.

1 for 3, stuff that for a game of soldiers and thankfully the grumbles are being well voiced on the AOA site. we can live in hope.
treboryelk is offline   Reply
Old 21st May 2009, 17:36   #18 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Vancouver. BC Canada
Posts: 71
Gee...... I can think of one. A notice to crew was issued with Freighter command positions available. Those interested submitted a bid, and the positions were awarded in seniority order. These are not "out of seniority" commands as you lot keep calling them.

Many of the successful applicants were put on hold while training courses were allocated to the DECs from Oasis, KA and god-knows-where else.

Now that there are training resouces available again, the company has chosen to honor the Freighter commands that were bid for and awarded by the original successful applicants. Simple really.

Your rants should be directed to the DEC fiasco, not the Freighter command issue.

Last edited by Penske; 21st May 2009 at 17:52.
Penske is offline   Reply
Old 21st May 2009, 20:54   #19 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 255
OK Penske

Imagine for a moment that a NTC went out advertising pax commands (of course this doesn't need a NTC because you're assumed to have applied when you joined the company, but bear with me). The successful applicants (Cat A F/Os) were then allocated command courses in seniority order.
There are training resources available but these courses have now been cancelled.
The -400 courses can be filled by either type of applicant. Both types of F/O applied and were allocated courses in seniority order.
Taking the freighter applicants first is slightly cheaper for the company, but is it still right?
Loopdeloop is offline   Reply
Old 21st May 2009, 21:12   #20 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Vancouver. BC Canada
Posts: 71
I have not kept up with the course allocations for Pax commands. IF there have been courses cancelled as opposed to just delayed, there is definitely an issue that should be addressed.

If the company wants to honour their commitments, it is only fair that ALL previously awarded commands go ahead - especially in light of the fact that the playing field had changed significantly with DECs and now COS08 since those officers bid their positions.
Penske is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 00:08.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".