PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Fragrant Harbour Forums > Fragrant Harbour
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26th July 2008, 10:37   #1 (permalink)
freightdog188
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SE Asia
Posts: 78
S/O upgrades

for those of you S/Os who still dream of the 777 ...

GAME OVER!

there will be no more upgrades on the 777! All training slots will go to DEFOs.
(to be precise: 4 spots left for 2008, and ZERO for 2009.
the Scarebus Adventure awaits all of you
this is the latest info from the one who doesn't know how ...
If you don't like the sound of that pls email the AOA en masse and try to get that sorted out.

freightdog188 is offline  
Reply
Old 26th July 2008, 11:06   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: mars
Posts: 99
This information is not new.

So you want people to give up bypass pay and wait 12 months for the 777. Well it's their choice, but I'd rather take an upgrade when it became available.

I'm sure the AOA is already aware, what do you think they will achieve.... If people are so unhappy about having to eat off a tray table, then they should write to the AOA....

I agree, you should be able to have some choice of fleet type, but has this ever been the case for S/O to JFO? I know there has been times when some have had a choice, but I do not think that this is the norm....
Humber10 is offline   Reply
Old 26th July 2008, 15:07   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 617
We gave up the choice of fleet in 1985 in return for "common jet salary".

As an old fart I can strongly recommend that you take the first available upgrade regardless of fleet!

Let me repeat that, "I can strongly recommend that you take the first available upgrade regardless of fleet!"
FlexibleResponse is online now   Reply
Old 26th July 2008, 15:39   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 12
Is it the same scenario for the command upgrade with regard to fleet type? Is it possible to fly three types as S/O, F/O, Capt??
BubbaJ is offline   Reply
Old 26th July 2008, 16:00   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 617
Yes and yes
FlexibleResponse is online now   Reply
Old 26th July 2008, 16:31   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Farm Country
Posts: 3
I believe that the real point being made here is that contrary to your contract DEFO's are being given priority in regards to training resources thus delaying S/O upgrades.. When you remove the B777 from the mix you effectively halve (read: lose) the JFO upgrade "opportunities". If their lips are moving...

Maybe this could be a job for.................. THE AOA!

In the meantime I would have to agree with FR:

"I can strongly recommend that you take the first available upgrade regardless of fleet!"


Cowboy One Arrival is offline   Reply
Old 27th July 2008, 05:08   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 41
The majority of the JFO courses on the 777 were done in the first half of this year. The focus is now on conversions (existing based 744 and Bus pilots) for the rest of the year.

This has been widely known since late last year.
jonathon68 is offline   Reply
Old 27th July 2008, 06:32   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 33
Posts: 6
Cut your losses

Cut your losses and leave while you still can.......
Dusk till Prawn is offline   Reply
Old 27th July 2008, 18:15   #9 (permalink)
MAX
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Right Here.
Posts: 499
so do something about it...

I dont know what you're complaining about?

Been with CX less than a year and just got my upgrade on the 777 and an Aussie base!

Thanks CX

MAX
MAX is offline   Reply
Old 28th July 2008, 02:38   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 13
MAX

777 and Aussie Base? B?!!sh!t.
Striker58 is offline   Reply
Old 28th July 2008, 02:50   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Curry Kingdom
Posts: 10
...perhaps Max isn't staying with CX. Very possible that he got his 777, Oz base and a Virgin too!
MayFly135s is offline   Reply
Old 28th July 2008, 12:32   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: 香港
Posts: 265
The whole DEFO thing stinks. I don't know how the AOA are letting the company employ so many DEFOs. And yes I am an AOA member.
EngineOut is online now   Reply
Old 28th July 2008, 14:00   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 306
Engine Out, in your opinion how should the aoa go about stopping the employment of DEFO's ? Is the company working outside the COS ? The answer is an emphatic NO. There has always been a provision for the company to employ DEFO's. Initially it was only on the frtr , now, since COS 08 is in it is on all fleets. Fact is, prior to COS 08 they could have legally employed DEFO's on pax fleets anyway as there was no legal framework to stop them.

Cowboy One, you state "I believe that the real point being made here is that contrary to your contract DEFO's are being given priority in regards to training resources thus delaying S/O upgrades". Please state the relevant section of your COS that backs your statement. Cannot - because there is no such clause in your contract. The trng plan changes sometimes weekly to meet the commercial needs of the company.

Gentlemen, I am no company apologist but sounds like you both just want a whinge. While I agree you probably have some cause for frustration it does help your arguement (and the general perception that we are not a bunch of knee jerking semi organised swill) if you know what the F you are talking about.

Now if you want to talk about bypass pay for officers whose commands have been delayed due Oasis tidal wave then you might get somewhere. At least you would have some legal arguement to put forward.

Last edited by fire wall : 28th July 2008 at 15:05.
fire wall is offline   Reply
Old 28th July 2008, 16:39   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA USA
Posts: 58
With regards to the DEFO/SO upgrade debacle, the only CONTRACTUAL problem is the companies interpretation on the "suitability" of SO's for upgrade and therefore bypass pay eligibility. There are now somewhere around 80 bypass pay triggers, ie extended captains and pax DEFO's but CX only assess the top 50 SO's or so. There are now approximately 30 guys that are not being paid because the company will only assess the top 50.

THIS IS HORSE FECES and is probably the most legitimate fight the AOA has to try and win at the moment,

putting away soapbox now.
Drunknsailor is offline   Reply
Old 29th July 2008, 04:59   #15 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: mars
Posts: 99
Well its even worse, from what I can tell, it's only the top 45 have had their review..... Aparently there is a sufficient pool of suitable S/Os, so therefore a longer wait to be assessed, unfortunately they continue to hire DEFO when they have suitable S/Os to assess and upgrade....

From what I can see from the AOAs latest survey, if they are considering giving up bypass for F/Os awaiting command, for age 65, I dont think that S/O bypass is high on the priority list.....
Humber10 is offline   Reply
Old 29th July 2008, 15:23   #16 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 41
But at least they have a seniority number!

When I was an S/O we joined CX on the S/O seniority list, and did not join the Command Seniority list until we made F/O. Quite a few DEFO's joined CX after I did, but are 200 places higher on the seniority list today. All of us in CX today took the deal we got, and must live with it.

Ask anyone who wore one bar (or one and a half!) in the 1990's about their seniority and be prepared for a tale of woe. Everyone gets "shafted" at least once in their CX career, its just a question of how badly.

CX can recruit DEFO's under our CoS, and if they pitch the terms and conditions low enough nobody but those new joiners will be interested in those Freighter Command slots, etc.

What can we do about It?
jonathon68 is offline   Reply
Old 30th July 2008, 03:17   #17 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: asia
Age: 36
Posts: 55
True, but with the influx of 'rapid commanders' the command seniority list isn't worth the paper it's written on anyway!
buggaluggs is offline   Reply
Old 3rd August 2008, 12:28   #18 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 94
Contract says they can hire DEFO, BUT the basing policy says that there will be NO direct recruitment on bases.

I believe it is due to the work of the AOA a while back that all SOs are now on the seniority list.
bobrun is offline   Reply
Old 4th August 2008, 14:26   #19 (permalink)
dirty deeds
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 165
If MAX is off to V, best of luck mate! Your going to loveeeeeeeeeeeeeee it there, a very professional outfit that will run like a well oiled machine. Enjoy the pineapple

dirty deeds is offline  
Reply
Old 5th August 2008, 15:45   #20 (permalink)
quadspeed
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: crewbag
Age: 36
Posts: 38
Most of the Cos99 guys have the following clause in their contract:

Recruitment of First Officers by Direct Entry will normally only take place when there are no Second Officers suitable for promotion.

Did the AOA at some point negotiate this clause away, or are there really no Second Officers suitable for promotion?

Last edited by quadspeed : 5th August 2008 at 19:06.

quadspeed is offline  
Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WJA upgrades readytocopy Canada 1 29th August 2006 16:02
Upgrades?? TikkiRo Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) 5 5th June 2002 23:21
Upgrades how? rekcarc Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) 12 26th April 2001 12:18


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:37.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".