PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Fragrant Harbour Forums > Fragrant Harbour
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16th July 2008, 06:55   #1 (permalink)
Composite Man
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Asia
Posts: 11
CX charges filed in NZ

It's only a possible $NZ30,000 fine but it all comes off the bottom line. It's about time someone was held accountable.

Quote:
NZ commission files airline charges

The NZ Commerce Commission is taking three international airlines to court alleging poor disclosure while it probes allegations of price fixing in the $NZ400 million air cargo market.
The commission said it has filed criminal charges in Auckland District Court against Cathay Pacific Airways, Singapore Airlines and Aerolineas Argentinas.
The charges allege non-compliance with notices seeking documents and information issued under the Commerce Act in October 2007.
If the airlines are found to be in breach of section 103 of the Commerce Act they can be fined up to $NZ30,000.
The commission declined to comment on the air cargo market investigation but said if it concluded there was a breach of the Commerce Act proceedings would be filed in the High Court later this year.
The commission on Wednesday defended the use of statutory notices.
"Any failure to comply with commission statutory notices that form part of a commission investigation is a serious enforcement issue," said chairwoman Paula Rebstock.
"Cartels are insidious and cause extensive damage to the New Zealand economy. They are difficult to detect and extremely difficult to investigate because of their secretive nature."
The commission is investigating allegations that certain airlines have colluded and reached agreements and understandings on the level of cargo rates, including fuel surcharges on international flights to and from New Zealand.
Airlines earn more than an estimated $NZ400 million each year transporting air cargo to and from New Zealand. A number of airlines are cooperating with the commission's investigation.
Overseas competition authorities are also investigating the air cargo market.
In the United States British Airways, Korean Air, Qantas and Japan Airlines have settled and agreed to pay record fines.
In total, the US courts have already awarded penalties of $US1.2 ($NZ1.57) billion against airlines for participation in a cartel that has increased air cargo rates to and from the United States.
Companies or individuals who bring a cartel to the commission's attention can gain immunity from prosecution through the commission's leniency programme.
Australian law firm Maurice Blackburn Cashman has filed a class action in the Australian Federal Court against Qantas, Lufthansa, Singapore Airlines, Cathay Pacific, Air New Zealand, JAL and British Airways on behalf of thousands of international freight users.
It alleged the airlines formed a cartel to fix fuel, security and war-risk surcharges against Australian freight users, who were fleeced an estimated $A200m ($NZ256m) over seven years.

Composite Man is offline  
Reply
Old 16th July 2008, 10:46   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oz
Age: 51
Posts: 115
What a huge surprise..........................more criminal activity from Swire.
BandH is offline   Reply
Old 16th July 2008, 10:47   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: MARS
Posts: 24
This and the other 60mil USD is only the tip of the iceberg!!!! Same DREAM - different TEAM!!
AD POSSE AD ESSE is offline   Reply
Old 16th July 2008, 13:47   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: hongkong
Posts: 117
And While We're On The Subject

https://www.airpassengerrefund.com/?

SEEMS BA AND VIRGIN HAVE SOME SKELETONS IN THE CUPBOARD TOO
BlunderBus is offline   Reply
Old 16th July 2008, 16:11   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Economy
Posts: 15
I have a few staff travel tickets during that period. I should try and collect.
Dead Head is offline   Reply
Old 16th July 2008, 18:17   #6 (permalink)
BigPimpin
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: yo momma's
Posts: 33
Let's see if monster330 has anything to say about this.

BigPimpin is offline  
Reply
Old 16th July 2008, 18:31   #7 (permalink)
Kitsune
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: England
Posts: 299
Do we get a part refund of the amenity kit?

Kitsune is offline  
Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ACK on flightplans filed in the USA GVA Dispatch Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. 4 19th December 2007 22:42
More than 20 civil suits to be filed here against SIA aviator_38 Rumours & News 0 30th October 2002 12:50
Transjet filed chapter 11 Brenoch Airlines, Airports & Routes 25 3rd August 2002 22:46
Concorde Crew lawsuit filed in US. Cyclic Hotline Rumours & News 15 28th July 2001 07:10


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:26.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".