PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Fragrant Harbour Forums > Fragrant Harbour Wannabes
Reload this Page Latest on Hiring
Forgotten your Username/Password?
Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Fragrant Harbour Wannabes A forum for those applying to Cathay Pacific, Dragonair or any other Hong Kong based airline or operator. Use this area for both Direct Entry Pilot and Cadet-scheme queries


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30th June 2009, 18:24   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Arizona, USA
Posts: 45
Latest on Hiring
What is the latest on hiring at Cathay? Word of mouth is they are only hiring through the cadet program, but the website shows they are additionally hiring first and second officers. Is this the most current information? What is competative to get hired as a first or second officer? Currently have over 6000 hours total time, approx 1670 as PIC in a Beech 1900, and 1000 SIC in a CRJ and 1000 SIC in A320. Lastly how long does it take to hear back after the initial application?

Spent some time in Hong Kong and loved it. Now that I am divorced it looks like a great time to give it a shot.
NEDude is offline   Reply
Old 30th June 2009, 20:02   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: asia
Posts: 68
The latest info I have is that there will be no pilot intake for the rest of this year and roughly the first 6 months of next year. I guess you can still apply though. Lets hope things improve soon.
ShirleyNot is offline   Reply
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:47.

Privacy Policy - Terms and Conditions - Contact Us - PPRuNe Home - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2009 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".