PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Fragrant Harbour Forums > Fragrant Harbour Wannabes
Forgotten your Username/Password?
Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Fragrant Harbour Wannabes A forum for those applying to Cathay Pacific, Dragonair or any other Hong Kong based airline or operator. Use this area for both Direct Entry Pilot and Cadet-scheme queries


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29th June 2009, 07:11   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: HK
Posts: 5
Is anyone here succeeded in CX CPP ICAO's re-sit test?

Hi guys,

What a pity, I'd failed in the ICAO re-sit's test recently. Is anyone here succeeded in it before? Would you mind give me some advice? It seems to me that I'm not gonna pass forever.
dreamlife is offline   Reply
Old 29th June 2009, 08:04   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: HK
Posts: 5
I wanna share with those who are going to have the pre-test.
The pre-test, as far as I heard, contains two parts: casual conversations and ICAO test related stuffs. I didn't pass though the casual conversations.
The assessor asked what I've done in the class? What else I've done outside the class? At the same time, he never stop criticising me which made me stressed. I think it's a kind of examing's criteria.

Good luck to all brothers/sisters in the same stage.
dreamlife is offline   Reply
Old 29th June 2009, 10:46   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: HK
Posts: 9
May i ask how long the test takes and do they give another chance if fail the test.
tombo66 is offline   Reply
Old 29th June 2009, 12:16   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: HK
Posts: 5
Well, there is no specified test-time. It depends on how long you can survive. You sill have the chance even you fail as CX mentioned we get one year to improve.
dreamlife is offline   Reply
Old 3rd July 2009, 09:11   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4
Hi dreamlife!

I am about to do my pretest soon.

Did the assessor tell you which part u failed?

Check PM too, plz!
Errr is offline   Reply
Old 5th July 2009, 10:59   #6 (permalink)
Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: VHHH
Posts: 2
Hi dreamlife,

When you say "Pre-test" does it mean that there would be another assessment after we passed stage 2?
tmtxpress is offline   Reply
Old 5th July 2009, 16:43   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: HK
Posts: 5
nah....You'll have an ICAO English test. However, touchwood, if you fail, you need to complete 100hours course and then go to attend a "pre-test" before have another ICAO English test.
dreamlife is offline   Reply
Old 7th July 2009, 11:19   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 7
Dreamlife,

Just wonder upon the recent change of policy in putting ICAO test prior to Stage 2 assessment, would candidates be offered a re-sit if they fail the test at this point of time? Or whether they need to re-apply and get started all over from stage 1A again?

Thanks for answering!
chanteur is offline   Reply
Old 10th July 2009, 07:57   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: HK
Posts: 5
Chanteur,

Sorry that I am not capable to answer. Recently, my friend passed the ICAO test but he'd been provided a grading (Level 4, 5 or 6).
dreamlife is offline   Reply
Old 23rd July 2009, 10:21   #10 (permalink)
Probationary PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1
I presume you mean your friend had not been provided with a grading.
Brian_Slade is offline   Reply
Old 6th August 2009, 10:39   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lantau, Hong Kong
Age: 34
Posts: 6
Has anyone been successful in the CX CPP ICAO re-sit test?

It seems that one of the difficulties is that people are not aware of their English ability in terms of an ICAO rating before they take the CX test.

If you take the ICAO test and do not achieve the required standard in any of the 6 categories the assessor will most likely recommend between 100 and 300 hours of English training.

That can be expensive, and possibly unnecessary. There is also the danger that the English training might not be appropriate for CPP candidates needs.

The main difficulty is that CPP candidates are being assessed by an internal rater - there is not (to the best of my knowledge) any independent body offering second opinions on the rating given. Actually CX don't have to - they know the English ability that they require in their cadets and they accept those candidates that meet their requirements.

ICAO testing is still a very new area, and there is much work to be done before there is any level of standardisation between tests. Particularly in the vaguely worded descriptors for levels 5 and 6. So don't be too hard on CX here. They have implemented a test and it seems to be effective and in line with our own independent tests.

The thing that is suspicious is that Cathay's assessor is recommending that candidates who do not reach the required standard take tuition from a friend of the assessor.

Now, at this stage I must declare that I am commercially involved in teaching aviation English. When I meet students that have not reached the required standard in the assessment, I am very aware of how much influence the assessor has over them.

I think that a personal recommendation for one private tutor from the assessor is an abuse of his position. There are some excellent English language schools in Hong Kong (including my own) and also some very bad ones.

How do you feel when you are referred to such a tutor? There is no magic pill for acquiring a language - language learning is an ongoing process and cant be acquired overnight.

A further consequence is that the assessor's conduct is preventing my own infant organisation developing. English for aviation is an area of language training that needs significant development. By recommending one particular tutor they are nipping this development in the bud (that's an idiom - you can guess what it means). The assessor's recommendation is anti-competitive.

There IS an alternative to the assessor's recommended tutor (though I am sure he is also very good at what he does). There is also more than one ICAO English test in the world, just as there are many types of English examination. Before you take the ICAO English test I recommend taking an independent assessment. This will give you confidence when you sit the CX ICAO test and a more detailed understanding of your language abilities and weaknesses.

Such feedback is important. Many students enrol in language courses unaware that they are out of their depth and struggle throughout a course.

If you choose to study with the assessor's friend, I wish you luck. I'm sure he is very good. If you would like to find out more about the courses that my organisation offers you are welcome to contact me or even ask PPRuNe members that have taken our courses and passed the ICAO test.

To date, 100% of our students have passed the ICAO English test and we are all very happy with the results.
Michael Egerton is offline   Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:37.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2009 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".