Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Flight Testing
Reload this Page >

Why didn't the RAF approve flicking the Bulldog?

Flight Testing A forum for test pilots, flight test engineers, observers, telemetry and instrumentation engineers and anybody else involved in the demanding and complex business of testing aeroplanes, helicopters and equipment.

Why didn't the RAF approve flicking the Bulldog?

Old 14th Jun 2003, 02:42
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Lurking within the psyche of Dave Sawdon
Posts: 771
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Why didn't the RAF approve flicking the Bulldog?

It's always struck me as odd that civilian Bulldogs are cleared for flick rolls but that they were banned when the aircraft were owned by HRH.
Anyone know why? Was it just an FI issue or something more interesting?
hugh flung_dung is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2003, 01:17
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,244
Received 330 Likes on 183 Posts
My understanding, from the period I was flying them as a student (1985-87), was that it was a qusetion of excessive fatigue on the empenage assembly/rear tail boom. Given the relatively high GH sortie use these a/c had compare to the civillian market, it seems sensible. The g limits were lower too for the same reason.

Ever the by the book student, I tried it a few times and in reality it wasn't worth it. Although the a/c was a good basic aeros machine (I won the 87 Reid trophy in one, so am particularly fond of it), it can't really be considere as a truly aerobatic one. You couldn't really do much in it by pushing forward either: if inverted you couldn't get it to climb (it just mushed and then you ran out of your 8 seconds inverted time). I tried pushing out from a stall turn recovery and had a "I learned about flying from that" experience.
212man is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2003, 23:10
  #3 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,212
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
I looked after the type at BDN for a few years, but well after it was certified and I don't recall the question ever being asked. My best guess is that probably it was never asked for, so BDN never assessed it and thus it was never cleared.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2003, 04:14
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I always thought it was because the fatigue monitor didn't measure rotational velocity, just +/-Gz (think I got that bit right!). Therefore any flicking led to an unquantifiable fatigue increase, particularly in the wing roots.

There probably isn't such a fatigue meter for light aircraft (at RAF budgets anyway), so it's all a bit academic.

We managed to break a wing spar doing the Cooper Trophy, must have been my slow roll recovery!
Feck is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2003, 05:42
  #5 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,212
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Interesting point. Certainly the Bloodknot's g-recording meter only recorded Nz (correct term), but whether that is the chicken or the egg is anybody's guess this many years down the line.

I'm still in touch socially with the RAF Engineer who brought the type online in the 70s, although he wasn't on the certification side. I'll pick his brains next we cross paths and see if he's any idea.

Bending a mainspar during Cooper Trophy competitions is arguable a way to lose lots of points! I take it that you didn't win.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 11th Jul 2003, 20:53
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My moons ago, I was fortunate to be an Air Cadet 'Staff Cadet' at one of the AEF's. The Boss (and others) told very interesting stories. If I recollect correctly (this was a long time ago), the Boss was the RAF pilot who wrote the Handling Notes. He was subsequently asked to take up a Bulldog and try and replicate the actions of a pilot who got the aircraft into a position where he couldn't regain control and had to bail out, with the loss of the airframe (some job, eh!). He tried numerous times, but couldn't.
Now this might be a huge red herring, but perhaps the loss of control followed a flick, and the RAF were never happy with the unexplained loss, so never cleared it it for flicking?
Just a thought.........perhaps others will clarify/confirm.
Bigears is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2003, 03:39
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
G,

Nz, Nz, Nz, Nz. Got it.

We didn't bend the spar, it just developed some interesting cracks. Allegedly we were supposed to spread the load over the whole fleet, but erm, didn't. Oops.
Feck is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.