ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

changing squawk

Old 28th May 2004, 14:11
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: channel islands
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question changing squawk

if I'm asked to change the transponder code enroute, do I need to select 'standby' while I'm changing it???
gurnzee is offline  
Old 28th May 2004, 14:18
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Changing squawk

I could be wrong in saying this but, you don't have to switch the transponder to standby whilst changing squawk. I.E There's no legal requirement for you to do so.

It is, however, good practice, as it prevents the transmission of an incorrect ident (as you're cycling through the transponder codes) especially, the emergency codes (7500, 7600, 7700).
eyuppp is offline  
Old 28th May 2004, 16:31
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but even so, the chances of accidently setting off the alarms are exceptionally remote.
Aircraft in the FIR squawking 7000, gets an airborne IFR clearance with the squawk 7701 (yes, it can happen). Dials in second '7', gets distracted, doesn't do final '1' quick enough.

The alarms will go off.

Now, having said that, there's no reason why you shouldn't leave it on when you're changing squawk. With new transponders you just push-button the code in anyway. However, be careful when you're doing it for the above reason.
Chilli Monster is offline  
Old 29th May 2004, 00:16
  #4 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
PPRuNe Radar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1997
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PPRuNe Search 'probably' has the answer
PPRuNe Radar is offline  
Old 29th May 2004, 07:31
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: united kingdom
Age: 62
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There was a discussion about this on here a couple of years ago. I can't remember all the details, but I think that there is now a training edict that you leave it on. If you go to standby you stop the protection of TCAS for those around you.
zkdli is offline  
Old 29th May 2004, 18:25
  #6 (permalink)  

Jet Blast Rat
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sarfend-on-Sea
Age: 50
Posts: 2,081
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How much of a big deal are brief false alarms that are easily traced? I had a transponder unilaterally decide to squawk 7700 (I genuinely had 7000 set. Perhaps we should go to an American-style 1200 away from 7000 to avoid this problem). Bournemouth radar let me know so I could recycle, which cleared the problem, but they sounded unfazed by the issue.
Send Clowns is offline  
Old 30th May 2004, 08:02
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: southampton,hampshire,england
Posts: 865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Send Clowns

The selection of 7700 will cause flashing and label bright-up on all Area control displays at Swanwick and elsewhere. It will inhibit the ability of the system to display genuine emergencies, because it can saturate.....especially on sunny days when the hangar-queens and "company" aircraft get airborne. If the offender happens to be in a busy portion of airspace.....even though all the other traffic is way above.....the 2-dimensional nature of the displayed information means that labels of airways traffic may be blotted out by the spurious 7700. Remember that many aircraft that use 7000 may not necessarily be in communication with anyone; additionally I should add that transponder confidence or validity checks are available via Londion Flight Information if there is no suitable SSR-equipped unit in your area.
055166k is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2004, 20:04
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ooooh gooody

Been wanting to get this off my chest for some time.

Concur completely with 055166k

PLEASE take more care when changing squawk! If you punch the code in directly then fine, but if you've got the little thumb wheel things then turn it to standby - one missed sweep of a radar does not a TCAS nightmare make. I, the other surveillance people and, I'm sure, D&D are sick to death of chasing up the endless spurious emergency squawks caused by this phenomenon, especially when you set it wrong and then trog all over the country VFR trailing a set of little flashing E's after your radar return - it makes my display all messy!
SpotterFC is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2004, 10:10
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We were told sometime ago on the Airbus fleet that we should not go to standby when changing squawk as it takes quite a long time for the transponder to start working again when it is switched back, standard practice is now to just the new code with unit still switched on.
meteor01 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.