Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight)
Reload this Page >

easyJet passengers - wrong Rome airport check-in?

Wikiposts
Search
Passengers & SLF (Self Loading Freight) If you are regularly a passenger on any airline then why not post your questions here?

easyJet passengers - wrong Rome airport check-in?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Feb 2005, 10:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
easyJet - wrong Rome airport landing?

In this link to a Swiss newspaper it is talking about the new compensation rules - it describes how passengers from Rome to Geneva went to Ciampino, but found their plane had 'mistakenly' landed at Fiumicino instead and that they had to make their own way there

http://www.24heures.ch/home/journal/...ue=Gros+titres

I understand the story around compensation, but am curious about the suggestion that the plane had mistakenly landed at the wrong airport.

I totally expect that it is Swiss newspapers proving they can get it as wrong as the British press - I presume what did happen was a diversion - anyone put the true story across?
jetstream7 is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2005, 11:13
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<<but am curious about the suggestion that the plane had mistakenly landed at the wrong airport.

I totally expect that it is Swiss newspapers proving they can get it as wrong as the British press>>

Don't be too quick to blame the press until you get the true facts. I experienced a/c doing something similar twice during my time at Heathrow so it's not unheard of.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2005, 11:24
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: western europe
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Northolt HD
hobie is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2005, 12:02
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: England
Posts: 14,999
Received 170 Likes on 65 Posts
Sometimes a Commander may decide not to land at Ciampino and elect to go a few miles away to Fiumicino instead. Usually in the case of the circling approach being in use at CIA. It is a demanding approach and if its a blustery night close to minima or part of the lighting is U/S (as has been the case recently) then airmanship alone dictates it better to land at the other Rome airport a few miles away.

Under no circumstances are you going to get the two mistaken and accidently land at the wrong one. They are quite different in many fundamental repects.

Cheers

WWW
Wee Weasley Welshman is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2005, 12:09
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<<Northolt HD >>

Oh yes... No, I meant Heathrow! One actually landed, another broke off the ILS!!
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2005, 14:30
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: London
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There were a couple of occasions a few months ago where Ciampino was closed for a few hours per day on separate days (some visiting dignatary by the name of 'Bush' I believe), and easyJet simply re-planned to operate through FCO. This was planned and sold as such on the internet.

Not sure if this news story is related, but perhaps could explain why pax may have got caught out?
In trim is offline  
Old 17th Feb 2005, 15:56
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NSW
Posts: 113
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Allegedly" the station commander of a Wiltshire military base (is that enough clues?) once landed at the wrong Ankara airfield in Turkey. No, not a diversion, just a muck up. The rest of the crew took the blame, obviously!

2P
2port is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2005, 21:13
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Israel
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A few years back, we had an Alitalia on Approach to Eilat (LLET) made a mistake and landed at Aqaba INTL' (OJAQ) in Jordan instead.....bit of a hassle for the PAX you can imagine.......


DT
DeltaTango is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2005, 03:53
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Down south, USA.
Posts: 1,594
Received 9 Likes on 1 Post
Snoop

2port: that can't be possible!

After reading Pprune months ago, we all learned that this can only happen to the US Air Force when attempting a fly-by at an airshow......especially if the crew can be connected to the state of Texas, which is undoubtedly the source of original sin (according to numerous "holier than thou" types)!
Ignition Override is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2005, 04:17
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 347
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Over the years, there have been enough examples through out the industry that perhaps Glass Houses and Stones should be considered.
innuendo is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2005, 06:22
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: LGW
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I operated as crew on that flight, and I knew before takeoff that we were going to FCO. Pax misunderstanding at other end. We did indeed take some pax home from FCO. ( the ones who got the right airport!!!) Nothing to do with easyJet landing at wrong airport
jettesen is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2005, 07:17
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<<After reading Pprune months ago, we all learned that this can only happen to the US Air Force when attempting a fly-by at an airshow>>

Hmmmm.. Quite obviously Ignition Override doesn't know the full facts.... in fact he doesn't know any!
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2005, 07:27
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,821
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
2port, it wasn't the wrong Ankara airport, it was the wrong Adana airport. Allegedly they landed at LTAF (Adana Sakirpasa) instead of LTAG, the military aerodrome at Adana Incirlik a few miles away.

The Stn Cdr in question did not try to shift the blame.

But perhaps much of the blame should go to the Ops and Air Movs people who insist on describing the destination as 'ADA' instead of using the correct name. Incirlik does not have an IATA indicator, just the ICAO indicator. So an itinerary LYE-ADA would indeed mean Lyneham to Sakirpasa, whereas EGDL-LTAG would clearly and unambiguously mean Lyneham to Incirlik. If the Ops/Movs people would stop using incorrect terms, the trap might perhaps be less easy to fall into.
BEagle is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2005, 07:52
  #14 (permalink)  
Just another number
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Age: 76
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So perhaps the title of this thread should be 'EasyJet passengers - wrong Rome airport check-in?'

Airclues
Captain Airclues is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2005, 13:56
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airclues... looks like that's happened, which is fair enough as now the truth is known.

Must say thanks to who ever changed it before I got the chance to, and who didn't show the post as being edited....
jetstream7 is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2005, 09:09
  #16 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Last year, the same airline sent me an email proclaiming proudly that they were starting a new service to Ljubljana in Slovakia.

Unfortunately, Ljubljana is in Slovenia, which is rather further from Slovakia that FCO is from CIA.

If they can't get the country right ...........
 
Old 21st Feb 2005, 19:37
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NSW
Posts: 113
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Beags

Don't want to hijack this post and start an us v them argument, you have a point there though.
BUT I'm sure it was Ankara. Confusion between Esenboga and Akinci I believe.
Can move this over to Mil thread for more facts, figures and innuendo....

2P
2port is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.