PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Military Aircrew
Forgotten your Username/Password?
PPRuNe Email Register FAQ Calendar Advertise Mark Forums Read

Military Aircrew A forum for the professionals who fly the non-civilian hardware, and the backroom boys and girls without whom nothing would leave the ground. Army, Navy and Airforces of the World, all equally welcome here.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3rd July 2008, 22:34   #1 (permalink)
JammedStab
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 33
Use of engine reverse in flight

I know the Galaxy is approved to do it. Any other military types?

JammedStab is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd July 2008, 22:58   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 59
C-17.........
Banggearo is offline   Reply
Old 3rd July 2008, 23:08   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 766
Harrier ?!

Well, sort of, a bit.

And the Galaxy & C-17 probably try to avoid actually flying backwards.
Double Zero is offline   Reply
Old 4th July 2008, 00:15   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Here, there, and everywhere
Posts: 376
Can the C-17 use reverse at idle on approach?
punkalouver is offline   Reply
Old 4th July 2008, 00:41   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In the Ether
Posts: 159
No - it can be used in the descent but not with the slats extended (due to the exhaust flow). Even so, and albeit with an acceleration, it can still achieve up to 20,000fpm RoD.

It certainly makes for an interesting (and mostly green) view from the flightdeck of a 200ton jet!

Uncle G
Uncle Ginsters is offline   Reply
Old 4th July 2008, 02:05   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 5,862
Not a military type, however, the DC-8 (some series) are approved, inboards only, as I recall.
411A is offline   Reply
Old 4th July 2008, 04:23   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Scotland
Posts: 406
411A you are indeed correct it was for the -71 & -73 fitted with the CFM motors, I was flying into Lagos with Southern when the Capt used them and for his trouble got wacked on the back of the head by the FE as He was worried about them stowing and being stuck there, as the flt mech I was not overly happy about the situation either
matkat is offline   Reply
Old 4th July 2008, 10:03   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Under the clouds now
Posts: 645
All DC8's had reverse thrust on the inboard engines as no speedbrakes were fitted. Flap settings were limited when reverse was used.
brakedwell is offline   Reply
Old 4th July 2008, 10:17   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: France 46
Posts: 616
The Mk 1 Andover was cleared for STOL landings from a 6 degree approach selecting reverse just before touchdown.
cazatou is offline   Reply
Old 4th July 2008, 10:37   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: various locales
Posts: 1,028
Quote:
it can still achieve up to 20,000fpm RoD.

It certainly makes for an interesting (and mostly green) view from the flightdeck of a 200ton jet!

Uncle G
I'm tempted to say 'no sh!t Sherlock' but it does sound fairly hairy! I've see empty ones go up like a rat up a drainpipe but 20K per min downwards (intentionally) must give you lots of options in a (mostly brown?) tactical environment.
Green Flash is offline   Reply
Old 4th July 2008, 10:50   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 175
Yak 40 centreline engine. It is used for some FSU Military transport.
pp
peterperfect is offline   Reply
Old 4th July 2008, 10:54   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: In Hyperspace...
Posts: 281
The Herc K can also do it - the only limitation on use of reverse thrust is a speed one - not above 115kts IIRC. It has been done in the sim to quite dramatic (and controllable) effect (1nm short finals, 5000ft agl, successful landing!)- however, it'd take some cojones to try it in the aircraft....prop hangup, anyone?
TheInquisitor is online now   Reply
Old 4th July 2008, 11:20   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 60
Reverse Thrust

The Trident reversed thrust, (outers) could be used anytime, any speed, right down to turning off the runway. Very useful on a shortish runway when you could be pulling reverse in the flare.
Krakatoa is offline   Reply
Old 4th July 2008, 13:35   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Yorkshire
Age: 64
Posts: 328
Oooer, missus!
exscribbler is offline   Reply
Old 4th July 2008, 14:22   #15 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South of the M4
Posts: 298
There's a YouTube video of a C-130 landing on the USS Forrestal. The comentary mentions that the pilot selected reverse thrust before landing.

Video here: YouTube - C-130 Hercules on an Aircraft Carrier!!

C-130 landing and take-off sequence starts about 2-mins into the video
Warmtoast is offline   Reply
Old 4th July 2008, 16:18   #16 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Scotland
Posts: 406
Bakedwell are you sure that the JT 3s had a in flight reverse capability? as my memory thinks they could not, though no speedbrakes as such they had inboard and out ground/flight spoilers that deployed on touchdown spent many an hour in the german cargo hangar rigging them.
matkat is offline   Reply
Old 4th July 2008, 17:12   #17 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Minneapolis Mn USA
Posts: 57
At World, our DC8-63's with the JT3D-7 had inflight reverse capability on the inboards only.
BigJoeRice is offline   Reply
Old 4th July 2008, 18:02   #18 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tijeras
Posts: 158
Used to be relatively common procedure on C-130 in Viet Nam...

As mentioned, used during Forrestal trials...

Fairly frowned upon these days as it makes for a rather unpleasant landing!

...overall, not approved however.
US Herk is offline   Reply
Old 4th July 2008, 22:40   #19 (permalink)
wrecker
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: south of 60N
Posts: 52
With The Gripper you could achieve 15000fpm down and more if you dropped the main wheels at 300kts. Trouble was the self loading cargo didn't like it

wrecker is offline  
Reply
Old 5th July 2008, 00:19   #20 (permalink)
N Joe
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South West
Posts: 126
Urban Myth?

Even though it's gated through the WoW on Tornado, it's still a bad idea to pre-select thrust-reverse on approach because if you make a hash of the landing, it kicks-in just as you bounce and makes your second landing even heavier!

N Joe

N Joe is offline  
Reply
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Posting Rules
vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Prop (engine/thrust) reverse use on FlyBE Dash 8-400 ZBB757 Tech Log 8 28th November 2007 15:10
In-flight Engine Restart AeroTech Tech Log 3 14th November 2005 04:18
B737 single engine landing and reverse thust? silverhawk Tech Log 10 21st December 2003 20:26
Reverse Thrust usage vs. Engine Life safety_worker Tech Log 2 22nd June 2003 17:00
Thrust reverse/twin engine jet aircraft 411A Tech Log 17 28th September 2002 17:53


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:30.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
© 1996-2008 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".