Qantas Shares! how low can they go?

[PammyAnderson]

Well Qantas shares have hit a dismal $2.81 today and looks like it will continue to go down. Dixon is about to leave, although with a tidy pay packet despite under his control having almost half the value of the company wiped out since its peak.

This seems to be for many reasons, obviously the current world wide economic crisis is a major factor. But what else has contributed? What could have been done better? Qantas has always had a bit of an invincible attitude to things in the past and has usually come out the tough times very well.

BUT.... The current reputation of qantas is at an all time low in the public and some say financial eyes. (justified or not I'll leave it for others to say) Safety incidents, failed APA Takeover, industrial trouble, morale, rising fuel....!!!

With the company taking so many hits, how long until it takes a bigger toll? Dixon said a long time ago they needed to merge with another airline. Is this a real possibility now? Is Joyce the man to turn it around? To me it has a little tinge of ansett pre demise about it. What do you all think?

[Ken Borough]

The shares may be down but let's face it, who's aren't? My view is that Qantas will survive as it has faced just about every adversity that life can throw at it, despite some questionable leadership in recent years. The new team has some challenges ahead but as we all know a new broom can cleanse; we are already seeing signs of this process before GD is out the door.


Another factor that will see Qantas through is the sheer professionalism of its staff at almost every level. Crew responded magnificently in the OJK and QPA saga and now ground staff are showing what can be done to maintain normal operations without two fleet units. Bravo all. :D:D:D


Just how many more incidents the Rat can take before the travelling public totally loses confidence in the carrier is probably a bigger and more concerning issue than the current economic situation.

[Capt Kremin]

Here is the Qantas chart for the last two years or so;

http://i451.photobucket.com/albums/qq235/Capt_Kremin/qantas.jpg

And here is the ASX200 for the same time period...

http://i451.photobucket.com/albums/qq235/Capt_Kremin/asx200.jpg
Notice any similarity?

NEXT!!!

[TurbTool]

It seems somewhat ironical to compare todays shareprice with the peak that was artificially created by the APA bid, rather than the shareprice just prior to that bid.

[SilverSleuth]

Yes but does the ASX mirror safety incidents? morale? public reputation? industrial problems???? :rolleyes:...
And even if so is it still ok that the company is worth half its previous value??
I think the post asked all those questions and what is going on?? Fair question I think.
Oh yeah.... next

[wirgin blew]

Lets look at the share price even further. Over a 10 year period the price is almost exactly the same. It has been higher, mainly due to a dubious takeover bid, but it is pretty much the same price.
You have probably received some dividends over that time period but would it have been worthwhile owning shares in this company over ten years compared to someone like CBA whose share price has actually doubled over this time.

[Skystar320]

Everyone is taking a huge hit on the stockmarket in recent weeks - just look at your superannuation!

Nearly all super funds have taken a hit, there were some news items to the exact amount lost

Shame, but NEXT!

[Capt Kremin]

Rio Tinto 19/05/08= $157.45/ now=78.01

BHP 16/05/08=50.00/ now= 29.84

BSL 20/06/08=12.29/ now=6.10

FMG 25/06/06=13.15/ now= 3.30

CBA 1/11/2007= 62.16/ now= 42.40

Random picks from the ASX100. All good well-managed australian companies trading at a fraction of their highest valuations in the last year or so.

Why aren't you guys questioning whether their performances are due to safety incidents? morale? public reputation? industrial problems

[Whiskery]

Pammy - don't fuss over the share par price, look at the dividends !

I bought QAN shares @ $2.95 and my first dividend realised 17 cents/share.
Two years ago when the par price was $ 6.25 iI was still getting 18 cents/share in dividends.
The latest dividend was 17cents/share and the par price is back around $3.50.
NEVER speculate in Airline stock - invest in a profitable airline, long term and you can't lose!!

Thanks Geoff ;)

[teresa green]

I am a shareholder, and quite frankly I don't give a rats A$se how low they go as long as Macbank and Allco never again have the opportunity to try to take it over. Had that gone ahead, we would have had another Ansett, as they would have stripped it of all assets (a la Murdoch and Abeles) to keep themselves afloat, and 36,000 people would be looking for a job. The whole world is in a spiral dive at the present time (though "Our Kev" is in denial) hold on to your hats for the next twelve months, as we watch our super go down the gurgler (and for a self funded retiree it is very unpleasant, might have to put the missus back to work, infact I have already told her she might have to get a job in the mines) no sense of humor that girl.

[genex]

I rarely find myself agreeing with Captain Kremin but I do so wholeheartedly now.

Qantas is a strong company, excellent routes, strong balance sheet, good board and new management team, excellent order book, great brand and complimentary subsidiaries. Add to that robust unions, entrenched experience base and an extraordinarily strong domestic market position.

Talking Qantas prospects down is mean-spirited and in any case non-productive. Ansett and all the other carriers that died along the way over the last 25 years, typically died from lack of all or most of the above attributes. In their last years they were carcasses on life support. Absolutely nothing like Qantas.

Qantas is simply a major company, not perfect but coping well in tough times and with a higher than normal focus on operational issues that for now obscures a clear view of an excellent overall performance.

End of story.

[maxter]

(though "Our Kev" is in denial)

Teresa, if that is the level of your thought and inteligence then that does not say much for any of your posts. I am sure you are better than that. What do you expect our Prime Minister to do. Get on 7.30 report and say the country is 'stuffed'? That would be a big help. I thought he handled the interview last night exactly as he should. His job is not to give commentary, a point he put very well.

You can be rest assured he probably knows more about where we are heading, than we do about 'tying our shoe laces'. I would say that the old image of the 'duck swimming' would sum up those at the top at the moment. If the last lot were so smart why didn't they tell us we were heading to the bottom. Exactly the opposite message from Howard & co just 9 months ago. I do not believe our position would be 1 bit changed, whoever won last years election.

This situation is well beyond the control of any Australian government and basically we are just along for the ride and thanking our lucky stars for coal and iron ore and slightly better regulations.

Sorry for the thread drift but sometime silly statements cannot be let pass without rebutal.:ugh:

[PammyAnderson]

$2.63 when I last checked.
A lot of people getting quite defensive here when we are openly just asking is qantas on the right coarse. Yes many many companies are down, but the discussion was, has it all been handled correctly?. What could have been done better to prevent them perhaps following suit of so many other companies. I am sure that the banks going bust atm are not saying well its ok cos other banks have.... so its not our fault. A recent article i read commented on the multiple problems Q was facing, (i.e the recent incidents/public perception industrial etc etc). Again is this contributing to their current financial woos.
In such a tightning market, qantas is getting yet another fleet type also. (380) Is this a smart move? How many types are that? Is the answer from the new Joyce man to continue the cannibalisation of mainline flying. You can only cut so much in essential operating costs and employee conditions. As i said reminds me a bit of ansett. I hope I am wrong...

[TIMMEEEE]

Is this a piss-take Pammy on the thread about how low the VB share price can go?

Perhaps Pammy would like to ask why the QF share price is down to near its float price many years ago.....but QF has paid a handsome dividend every year since its float!

As opposed to Virgin Blue that floated at some $2.25 to Mum and Dad investors under the huge fanfare of that grinning publicity-seeker Branson and his whingeing, whining little side-kick Brett Godfrey.

The VB float was touted as one of the great investments for Australians by Sir Dick and is now floundering at about 33 cents.
And the only time it every really paid a dividend, Branson himself complained like an old mole and complained to the board bitterly.

Gee Pammy, spoken to any Mum and Dad investors about how much they have been taken for a ride and what exactly they think of Branson and Godfrey? Let me guess.........

And while we're at it, lets start a new service to the USA (where the economy is on the verge of collapse/recession) with a new and expensive aircraft type.
Let's sell tickets without an AOC, whinge about having to refund the money, whine about the Boeing strike, delay the start until God-knows-when, p1ss off the travelling public that purchased tickets in good faith and head straight into financial oblivion by operating to a destination with a collapsing economy being made even more expensive to travellers by the falling AUD$!

And dont expect much traffic coming the other way for a few years either because the Americans are feeling it even worse than us and their worst is yet to come.

Now thats an airline I would love to work for.......not!

Perspective Pammy......perspective!

[packrat]

The money that has been made on the stock market over the last 5 years has gone.
But there are some great bargains out there at present.
Warren Buffet maintains that to buy a stake in a company:
1.A company should make something that everyone needs
2.It should be profitable and well run
3.It should provide an income stream.ie dividend.
4.It should offer fair value when compared with asset backing.
There are a lot of companies that now meet these criteria.
Now is a good time to buy.
Airline stocks have always been stocks to avoid.
But....with Qantas shares approaching float price you'd have to be tempted.
Dont try to pick the bottom of the market before buying.
Do the research and if a company meets the above criteria...buy them

[SilverSleuth]

Well Considering the price is now at $2.58 I think this thread has something other to do than VB sorry to say Timmee. Is that yours and others only defence to any questions about qantas?
I notice there was nothing about pammys points and questions?
IE the leadership? Could this price been avoided? The recent continuing incidents? Public confidence and safety perceptions? The industrial problems? The moral? Fleet expansion?
From reading the thread Pammy only asked, have or are these things contributing? FAir enough I think.
Show some maturity for once and try not turn it into a vb thread as your only defence for what are some obvious genuine questions.
I think the mum and dad investors of Qantas who bought up near $6.00 are probably hearing the pain you are chatting about too. At $2.58 now they're for the first time below what VB once was. I wonder if they will keep following them..
Just cos VBs shares are woeful should it be ok Qantas shares are also. And as the thread said, could it have been avoided?

[another superlame]

I sold my shares after the bid failed back in July 07 and got $5.75 per share, multiplied by xxxx thanks very much. It was a nice bonus to go with my redundancy from 10 months before.

I am not much into the share market but to me now seems like a great time to buy QF shares again. $2.60 odd is a bargain.

And who knows. they might even employ me again in the future so that they can make me redundant a few years down the track.

And another thing about airline shares. I remember when ANZ got bought out by their government and their share were a dsmal 50-60c. That was just a gold mine waiting to be plundered. If only I had some cash to make a purchase back then.

Oh well

[teresa green]

Maxter, thankyou for pointing out my inadequate ways, but you see I am not so warm and fuzzy about Dear Leader. To my way of thinking the Labor Party was elected in 07 on its eviromental and workchoices ticket, its history of poor economic management is well documented, and Rudds poor performance on the 7.30 report the other night, when he refused to answer any question, but used political speak (in otherwords said twenty minutes of twaddle) when all the punters want to know is,will they still have a house and a job next year? Not to hard really. Of course I don't expect the bloke to use the R word and start a stampede, but anybody with half a brain realises that Australia simply occupies the best cabin on the Titanic, (beautifully put in the Australian today) and to keep saying "We will be alright Jack" is pure crap. As a self funded retiree, my super is in a spiral dive, and I would like nothing better than the whole bloody mess come to a successful end. I did not flog myself around the skies, in just about anything with wings, for forty nine years to end up in a one bedroom flat with a one bar heater, and it is of great concern to me(and a lot of other people) that tweedledum and tweedledee are in charge. :{

[packrat]

Vent your anger at the super heroes of Wall Street.
This mess began about 18 months ago and is now reaching a crescendo.
Way before Rudd was elected
If Howard was in power he would be facing the same mess and be just as powerless.
There is a lesson here dont put all your eggs in one basket.
Spread the risk...shares property cash,antiques ,stamps,vintage cars.
By the way we are not heading into a recession..more like a bloody depression.
Your shares will recover...but it will take awhile.
.Hold onto your hat ..there is still a little way to go...down.
Word is another 1000pts off the Dow

[Capt Wally]

Might be a good time to buy QF shares while they are as low as the moral is, when they go under the current 'Rudderless" Govt might bail those share holders out 'cause we can't have the famous 'red rat' dissapear, wouldn't put it past 'em !:ooh:



CW

[601]

If people are selling with some selling below cost, who then is buying and what do they think of the future direction of the market?

Maybe KO'B should pose that plain simple question to the buyers instead of the smart-arse questioning of K707 last Thursday night.

[denabol]

The market this week hasn't been driven by rational analysis of the value of an airline, a bank, or a mine to anything like the degree to which it has been a dash for cash.

Let's choose a hypothetical case. You may know that QAN is worth $4, even now. But you also know the investment funds that chase the index and buy from a range of stocks which include QAN include one or more than could go broke. When or if that happens the QAN stock they hold will, theoretically, be sold for 10 cents by the fund's liquidators, far below the value of the asset even if the entire fleet was to be parked. So an otherwise rational assessment of QAN or VBA means stuff all. You get out, cashed up, even at a loss, knowing that the Aussie big banks will be the last in the world to go tits down.

A lot of this cash will end up in treasury bonds, including issues that might be sprung on a grateful market with not much more than very short notice.

Rationality will only come back into the picture when stability seems to have been assured in the ASX. I don't think that is likely any day soon.

[teresa green]

Knowing what I know now, if I were you young bucks, I would be buying real estate, (not units) you need to own the land, the house can be crap, but while you own the land you have to do ok. Up here in SE Qld, the land is running out, ditto anywhere within 10 ks of the ocean. What lies ahead for you young blokes is anybodies guess, with climate change (if it is for real) world markets, probably the changing of the guard, with India, China, and Russia once more making a lot of noise on the world stage, and perhaps another depression (hopefully not) Super is now shown for what it really is, far too dependant on world markets, and I doubt if much will be learnt from all of this, as greed will always win, it is the nature of the beast. (In fact I just read yesterday where some US bank, that has just been bailed out by the taxpayer, has organised a pissup at some 5 star hotel for the execs to celebrate their recovery, so their noses are already back in the trough.) I am probably stating the bleedin obvious here, but for self funded retirees these are worrying times, as you have probably learnt from your parents.

[kotoyebe]

To my way of thinking the Labor Party was elected in 07 on its eviromental and workchoices ticket, its history of poor economic management is well documented, and Rudds poor performance on the 7.30 report the other night, when he refused to answer any question, but used political speak (in otherwords said twenty minutes of twaddle) when all the punters want to know is,will they still have a house and a job next year?

TG...enlighten me. Exactly what difference to your super would there be this week if the other mob was in? In particular what would Howard have said in that interview that would have made your super resilient to the downturn, and our stock market not tank. Give us a percentage figure that you think your super would be better. I'm truly curious.....

Also, Keating is highly regarded by commentators and both sides of politics as reforming the economy, and a significant contributor of the good times under Howard. I concede you can point to some poorly managed state Labor governments.

[teresa green]

Well for a start, I would prefer to have a fully qualified Captain up the front with years of experience, when the ship hit turbulance, not the earnest but still wet behind the ears Second Officer. Regardless of what you think of the Liberal Party and Costello, not to many starved under their watch, and while I have to agree with you, it might not make much difference to my super (that is right now being dictated to by world events) I would still prefer the experienced Capt up the front as long as the flight continues. As for your remarks about Paul Keating, you were obviously still at playschool, whilst that egomaniac dragged this country thru the "recession we had to have" and when the Aust public finally had had enough he left a debt you could not leap over. As for Whitlam the less said the better, just that my dog could organise his kennel better. Hawke whilst the best of a bad bunch, at least did not run the country into near bankruptcy, but as a 89er, once more the less said the better. Please tell me what Rudd has done so far, sure he said "sorry" and joined Kyoto which is not worth the paper its written on, but all the bloke does (when in Australia) is talk about "transparency" and other political claptrap, in fact the bloke can talk for twenty minutes without saying anything. The poor old pensioners are, according to my quack, starting to show signs of malnutrician, (yes I know the libs could have done more) but these are desperate times, and something needs to be done now, not after yet another review in Feb. Bob Carr, now there is a pollie for you, run NSW into near bankruptcy, whilst the NT had to get rid of Claire Martin whilst it was still solvent, Peter Beatty, well what can you say? Paid off by Rudd as he was getting on the nose, and given a "job for boys" OS, and then there was Mark Latham.....you can have em mate. Oh and don't forget Ms Neal from the NSW Central Coast "Don't you know who I am" and the phedophile from NTL. Yep, this country has a lot to look forward too, no doubt about it.

[packrat]

You are the old conservative generation who had little understanding of Macro Economics and the trickle down effect of decisions made now and the time they take to come to fruition.
Costello et.al did not invent the commodities boom,the housing price boom or the appreciation in the $A.
A drovers dog could have run the economy over the last ten years.
Come to think of it a little strutting dachshund was in charge.
Start your own thread regarding this matter.

[teresa green]

I am still waiting for a decision, any decision, to be made Ratpak.

[PammyAnderson]

OUCH !!!

The carrier fell 3.4 percent to A$1.69 at 3:00 p.m. in Sydney. It has lost 36 percent this year, the worst performer among the 15 stocks in the Bloomberg Asia-Pacific Airlines Index

It actually shut even lower at $1.67.

Bloomberg.com: Australia & New Zealand (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601081&sid=aVKgSK24SjP8&refer=australia)

[Orangputi]

What do you expect that huge pig Dixon is finished at the trough now, he and his cronies should be strung up! What a complete PR&*K !

[Pole Vaulter]

Still a lot higher than Virgin Shares at about 25 cents

[PammyAnderson]

Well that will mean a lot when they start laying off people. :rolleyes:

[QFinsider]

look at the capitalisation pole before you compare a share price ...

[another superlame]

Well my timing was good, I sold all mine 18 months ago for $5.80 per share, thank you Geoff ang Maggie.

[denabol]

Interesting how the media handled the double talk from Qantas about its investment downgrade.

The Oz seems to bend over and take it.

Qantas rating hit by financial turbulence | The Australian (http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/business/story/0,28124,25083993-23349,00.html)


Plane Talking takes it to Qantas but says Virgin Blue's turn is coming.

Qantas Moodys the waters as shares sink deeper - Plane Talking (http://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalking/2009/02/20/qantas-moodys-the-waters-as-shares-sink-deeper/)

Business Spectator gives a fuller explanation here;

Business Spectator - Qantas' ratings cut on debt, profit fears; shares fall 4% (http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/TEXT-Moodys-lwrs-Qantas-Baa1-rating-to-Baa2-outloo-PF47R?OpenDocument&src=srch)

For my money, and I'm sitting on a loss on QAN and a loss on VBA, I think I'll just keep them in a drawer full of little horrors and hope that things get better in time for them being worth cashing by the grand children when they bury me down by the dam where the working dogs lie.

[1a sound asleep]

For my money, and I'm sitting on a loss on QAN and a loss on VBA,

Me too. And QAN just offered me the opportunity to buy more shares @$1.85. Thanks Qantas for the great offer, but no thanks.

[Quokka]

For my money, and I'm sitting on a loss on QAN and a loss on VBA...

It's only a loss when you sell them. ;)

I don't have time for QF because of a disfunctional corporate culture and failed service delivery.

VB, however, has much potential. Not without risk, but then the buying opportunity would not have presented itself without risk. On this one, patience.

As for any investor who is risk-averse, ponder the words of the CEO/Chairman of Nestle when asked about his views in regard to risk-management:

"Life is risk my friend, if you can't accept risk you shouldn't be living".

[capt.cynical]

QF shares hit a new low today $1.58 !! :sad: Any bets on $1.50 bt weeks end ? :ooh: :{

[StallBoy]

My Father told me never buy shares in anything that fly's.

[Under Dog]

[quote]
"It's only a loss when you sell them." http://static.pprune.org/images/smilies/wink2.gif


Or they go broke and you lose the lot.

The Dog

[zube]

Stallboy.

My father said "If it flies,floats or f**ks you're better off renting it."

Fathers are very wise.

[indamiddle]

hey zubes, maybe you shouldn have attributed the quote to someone else.
mods, why not combine this thread with the vb,how low.....?

[roamingwolf]

It's only a loss when you sell them.
No mate you don't have to sell them cause it's also a loss when the company goes under and your life savings in shares are as useless as an ash tray on a motor bike.

Like teresa said Gods not making any more real estate and thats where my money is.Forget bricks and morter buy land.

[SilverSleuth]

QF shares hit a new low today $1.58 !! Any bets on $1.50 bt weeks end ?

Not this week, but at $1.56 and with the way they are sinking I would say you wont be waiting long.
Apparently leave without pay is being looked at in QCC ATM and will be offered to TC shortly if things don't improve in the next month or two.

[capt.cynical]

At 1044hrs $ 1.465 today $ 1.40 by weeks end ?? :{

[PammyAnderson]

$1.45 ... !! Jesus. I think the old Jetstar conditions will heading to mainline sooner than we think.

[Mstr Caution]

At what point is the "trigger" where QF will have to act to preserve the mainline brand? If at all?

An example of sacrificing a successful product to protect the main / core brand is Estee' Lauder.

Estee' set up a lower cost product & re-branded these products which they distrubute thru Target stores nationally. The product has been & continues to be very profitable at the lower end of the market.

However Estee' has decided to scrap the lower cost / budget brand to reduce costs for the entire Estee' group even though the budget brand has been hugely successful.

The result being reduced costs via employment,advertising, duplication processes, distrubution costs & consolidation on the main or premium products.

Is QF in such a state where our own industry brand consolidation may occur?

[flysaucer1200]

This could be one of my print outs after i have done some SIM sessions. It appears to be the same style of landing as mine. As its a renewal ( taken from a side-on prospective ). Each month is equal to 2 miles and the left hand blue numbers are my feet. I had trouble for a moment or two there, having ballooned after putting down the flaps and gear, but now there down and my speed is under control, its only a matter of time before i land nicely? The bottom column graph is where i was using throttle. You can see that at times i really slapped it in, of late it has been bit over active maybe. Only thing i forgot, as i'm still IMC, is what is the field elevation?? Hope i don't hit that ground?! I forgot what the right hand red numbers meant? maybe someone else could fill me in
FS1200:ok:



http://hfgapps.hubb.com/asxtools/imageChart.axd?BI=2&COMT=index&OVS=XJO&TF=D6&TIMA1=20&TIMA2=20&s=QAN

[Capt Kremin]

QAN did go ex-div today.. so that accounted for 6c of today's fall. The rest of it was probably just in line with the fall on the rest o the market.

[Stationair8]

Issue price $1.90 from memory.

[Stationair8]

I reckon SkyAir World management will be robbing their piggybanks, selling their grandmothers, stealing mum's milk money to make a takeover bid for Qantas!!!

Come back Mr Dixon and try and find another private equity buyer!

[GoNorth]

At 1044hrs $ 1.465 today $ 1.40 by weeks end ??

$1.38 this morning. :uhoh:

[Ken Borough]

Last year Qantas was busy with a share buy-back at prices that, when compared with today's price, look like a King's Ransom. Now, Qantas is seeking to raise capital by issuing shares in order to fund new fleet. Is the planning such short term that the need to fund fleet was unknown at the time of the share buy-back? We know that a lot has happened in the financial world in the last twelve months - I wonder if the market declines are the reason for this latest capital raising?

[Garry1946]

While watching Morning TV at work the Tuesday after the Victorian bush fires, the presenter claimed that the Red Cross appeal had just reached $64,000,000. I mentioned to the staff I was with that GD would have got that much alone if the Airline Partners deal had gone through. Allowing for inflation it would be worth a great deal more than Judas' 30 pieces of silver. All we can hope now is that he has been paid in shares and not cash. At $1.445 he must be cursing.

[zube]

QF could always offer some of the older dudes an incentive payment to retire early. This would protect some younger pilots jobs. Those with many years of service left.

But methinks they are a bit too conservative to think outside the circle.

[Stationair8]

Why would an old dude want to retire early?

[lowerlobe]

QF could always offer some of the older dudes an incentive payment to retire early.
Remember zube...

There's always someone younger than you who thinks you're an old dude....

[Angle of Attack]

I find it quite laughable that just 1 year ago execs were announcing tooth and nail they need to run the company to the benefit of shareholders, to maintain their divendend etc. Well quite frankly that has become a mute point as the sharemarket quite rightly has been hammered down to a realistic level. 12 year low lol! I notice the Super funds have gone quiet even of their long term levels of profit because they have been absolutly hammered also! The share price/share market is a paper economy, who cares about the price! Its all about the company. Qantas as well as heaps of others have been mauled, but I beg a different opinion who cares? Its all about whther the company survives or not not about a specualtors crappy sharemarket price. I would ask how low can any companys shares go? I would say theres no limit, there is a possibility it could go to zero and wipe it all out. I wouldnt be surprised... :}

[Quokka]

No mate you don't have to sell them cause it's also a loss when the company goes under and your life savings in shares are as useless as an ash tray on a motor bike.


Under Dog and roamingwolf,

So you're stating that the two largest Australian aviation companies will go into receivership this year?

Sorry, was that VB? QF? or both?

[roamingwolf]

Quokka,Mate I was answering a post which said the ONLY way to lose money on your shares was if you sold them at a low price.
So you're stating that the two largest Australian aviation companies will go into receivership this year?
Pal,I'll give you a hint and it's a big NO.Are you sure not not with some news team cause thats not what I said.
IF you read my post I said that was not the only way you could lose.If the business you had shares in goes bust then you lose as well.Quokka,I did not say any business or QF or VB was going to go bust but in todays market anything s possible.
Since you mention it mate,if either airline did go bust which one do you think the government would bail out?

[PammyAnderson]

$1.44 now......ouch !!!

[lowerlobe]

So you're stating that the two largest Australian aviation companies will go into receivership this year?
Interesting extrapolation Quokka....

I don't remember seeing any timeline being suggested for something to happen but...by your post are you stating that an Australian airline will not go into receivership or at least need a bail out from the Australian Government in the not too distante future???

You would bet money on that?

After seeing what is happening in the US with the largest corporate loss in US history,are you willing to guarantee that something won't happen to a large Australian business?.....

Because I wouldn't.....

[Teal]

Most of the market down again today, including QF and VB (down 2.06% and 4.44% respectively). QF/VB charts are pretty depressing.

http://i365.photobucket.com/albums/oo92/essendonfc/QF-VBAchart.jpg

[missy]

Both airlines would be healthier if:
1) As the provider of civilian Air Traffic Control, ASA had sufficient staff so that there were no delays due to staff unavailability;
2) LTOP at Sydney was put firmly on "hold" [reduction in airborne holding];
3) ASA had sufficient staff such that PRM could be operated in Sydney [reduction in airborne holding and/or ground delays];
4) Changes to the pricing policy such that the airlines no longer paid the government a premium (tax) - up to $100m profit made by ASA per year.

[wirgin blew]

Interesting to note that QF Group seems to maintaining market share through the growth of J*. How long will it take for J* to take over as the main part of the group? 5 years, 10 years.

[RedTBar]

wirgin blew ,If Vb goes under then Jetstar will have it's hands full coping with all the work but at the end of the day there will always be a legacy airline with the business market.
The domestic market supports a LCC because you get the people who used to catch the bus or the trains but internationally Jetstar is still a hit and miss idea.

Your idea is like Target taking over from David Jones.

The idea of flying in a jetstar config to Europe or the US would be a big mistake.The punter only uses Jetstar to HNL because QF has cut back and there's no alternative thanks to GD.

If you are crew with VB and it does a titanic you never know you might end up wearing a Singapore girls outfit:E