PDA

View Full Version : IFALPA Press Release Industrial Action By Cathay Pacific Airways Flight Crew


realitycx
30th June 2001, 19:32
PRESS RELEASE
28 June 2001
INDUSTRIAL ACTION BY CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS FLIGHT CREW

[url]http://bbs.hkalpa.org/public/default.htm[url]

The Hong Kong Airline Officers’ Association (HKAOA), representing the Pilots and Flight Engineers of Cathy Pacific Airways, announced today that they would be commencing limited industrial action against Cathay Pacific from 1 st July 2001.

The HKAOA, through the Hong Kong Airline Pilots’ Association (HK-ALPA), has called on the International Federation of Air Line Pilots' Associations (IFALPA) for support in its struggle with Cathay Pacific Airways

IFALPA, which represents in excess of 100,000 flight crew in 95 countries has called upon its Member Associations to support the request from the HKAOA by agreeing to operate extra flights or increasing capacity on routes where the action by the HKAOA could lead to disruption. The purpose of this request is to limit the effect of the action on the travelling public by ensuring, as much as is possible, that seats on flights are available while still effecting the services of Cathay Pacific Airways. The HKAOA, Hong Kong ALPA and IFALPA are keen to demonstrate in practical terms that the dispute is with Cathay Pacific Airways and not with its’ passengers.

The dispute arises from the failure of Cathay Pacific management to negotiate in good faith on matters such as flightcrew fatigue, to address other long-standing issues such as discriminatory employment practices, and generally poor management by Cathay Pacific.

The cockpit fatigue issue centres on the manner in which Cathay Pacific have implemented the Hong Kong Government regulatory rules on fatigue which were first promulgated in 1998. Cathay Pacific has put in place variations which they have implemented without consultation with their flightcrew and which have not been satisfactorily addressed in four years of negotiation.

The discriminatory employment issue is over the two-tier pay system that discriminates between pilots and which particularly discriminates against locally employed Hong Kong Chinese pilots.

The poor management complaint stems from 1993 with the introduction of the airline’s discriminatory employment regime. This has resulted in a series of strikes and industrial action by flightcrew and cabin crew. Cathay Pacific have failed to address the important issues arising from very poor employment practices through constructive negotiation and this has resulted in many court cases being undertaken. Efficient operations, the success of Cathay Pacific Airways and the interests of its’ employees are compromised by poor management.


Queries and comments should be addressed to:
Captain Dennis Dolan, Principal Vice-President, Professional Affairs Mr Stan Clayton-Smith, Director, Professional Affairs

Turtlenest
1st July 2001, 01:03
I guess industrial action means different things in different parts of the world, but how can an "industrial action" be effective if the Cathay union is asking (in effect) other carriers to scab against them? It's been my experience that as long as the money is coming in, management has no reason to negotiate - a la - the old mutual aid pact and what Nyrop did at NW years ago.

10sne1
1st July 2001, 01:22
It isn't scabbing when the union in the dispute requests other airlines to pick up the load. It is only scabbing when the union asks them not to. It is quite a smart move actually, it tells the public that the union cares about them and it tells the other guys out there that they won't be considered scabs if they pick up the traffic. The goal is to make it financially difficult for the airline to operate and wet leasing airplanes cuts into your bottom line. If you need an aircraft to take up flights to BKK for example the cost is the same empty or full, most airlines wet lease their tin and crews out at a fixed cost. So if the dispute causes the bookings go down and the schedule is maintained the goal is met and the pax are more less looked after.

wonderbusdriver
1st July 2001, 01:55
Very smart move and GOOD PR, IŽd say.

The conflict is between the pilots and the management - NOT the customers.
Good idea when having to "sell" your demands to the public.

The point of industrial action is to put pressure on the people making the decisions, by threatening with costs and convincing them that better working conditions will hurt the bottom line less than losing business to competitors.

Stay focussed and
Good Luck!!

Landing Lights
4th July 2001, 15:16
Winning over passengers wont work if the Union field the clown they did on CNBC Asia in the last 24 hours - sorry missed the name I was in the shower! His arrogance will win no friends, especially those even evaguely sympthatic. Forget it, pax are going to hate you irrespective of the PR machine... mess up Jo Holiday and you are in the doghouse anyway.

The big flaw in the union line being taken is that the union says its not really about pay, but conditions (rosters etc). Strikes - no pun intended - me that if you sign up to fly for any airline with a maximum 'legislated' number of duty hours etc. per month and they underutilise you for years (aka poor management) - which CX and others did - but then management wake up and get the maximum use out of the legit hours per month then that's GOOD management. If CX have done nothing illegal - no one has suggested that (the HK Govt/CAD would have jumped on that for sure) & the Pilots are not 'really' looking for more money then the arguement is flawed.

You need to avoid looking more like PAL which ran more for the benefit of its employees than the business - thats from being Asia's best they rank among thw worst.

Sounds like falling on your sword Guys!

411A
4th July 2001, 17:23
Indeed, when these guys came to Cathay, they asked for work, and now when the company asks them to abide by the contract that was negotiated, they want to back away. Same argument can be used about salary, they agreed to the 'B' scale and now say "no thanks". Try as they might, the PR for the CX pilots will be bad.
But, as was stated on this forum by some of them, they don't care about the traveling public.
Falling on swords seems to be their speciality.

Chunkee
9th July 2001, 02:12
Gentlemen of Cathay Pacific, well done, great move.

Ignore the last couple of posts, your doing a fantastic job of it.

I support and admire your strength.