Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Flying Instructors & Examiners
Reload this Page >

Your FI rating is worth just £4 a flight!

Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

Your FI rating is worth just £4 a flight!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Dec 2016, 10:43
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
As Whopity implies, there will be no resolution to this until it ends up in court, probably following a fatal accident. The court may determine that by influencing the flight path of an aircraft a person is 'acting as' a pilot or, on the other hand, they may not. Meanwhile, individual opinions are worthless and unscrupulous ATOs may continue to rip off the unsuspecting public.
BillieBob is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2016, 11:37
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I think the IN is perfectly reasonable and clear:
An organisation intending to offer such flights as regular business activity is not considered to meet the condition of marginal activity.
Also, flights organised with the sole intent to generate income for the organisation are not considered to be a marginal activity.’
By advertising Introductory Flights in the public domain, they fail to comply with GM2 Article 6.4a(c) of the Operations Regulation and can only be flights for the purpose of Public Transport.
Whopity is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2016, 16:40
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scotland
Age: 43
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Whopity
I think the IN is perfectly reasonable and clear:


By advertising Introductory Flights in the public domain, they fail to comply with GM2 Article 6.4a(c) of the Operations Regulation and can only be flights for the purpose of Public Transport.
I agree, but the CAA is not enforcing this. The CAA is not fit for purpose and something will only happen when an accident occurs...
Edgington is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2016, 16:46
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: europe
Age: 67
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Except that IN's and GM's are published to inform and provide guidance. These notices or the guidance do not form part of the legislative text.

Sadly I agree with those who believe that the CAA has lost the plot, and I am sure that many would describe it as an authority that is fast becoming unfit for purpose.

It took the Shoreham accident to focus a very bright light on the CAA's oversight of airshows. I hope that they get to grips with overseeing this matter before an innocent prospective student comes to grief while receiving a trial lesson from a 100hr PPL dressed in three cornered trousers!
deefer dog is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2016, 21:54
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
....I am sure that many would describe it as an authority that is fast becoming unfit for purpose.
Including, according to a friend in Cologne, EASA. Not that they are likely to do anything about it, being almost equally dysfunctional.
BillieBob is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.