Own checklist
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Own checklist
We are trying to create a more structured checklist for our ATO when flying the DA42. Something which is more airline oriented with flows than the Diamond checklist.
Is there written somewhere that we can not use our own checklist as long as it encompassed all that is required for each phase of flight.
Someone told me EASA has written a new regulation requiring us to use the manufacturer checklist however i cannot find it.
thx
Is there written somewhere that we can not use our own checklist as long as it encompassed all that is required for each phase of flight.
Someone told me EASA has written a new regulation requiring us to use the manufacturer checklist however i cannot find it.
thx
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Near Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Someone told me EASA has written a new regulation requiring us to use the manufacturer checklist however i cannot find it.
If everyone would be forced to use manufacturer checklists, the first thing to change would be the 5 minute time span between asking for start up and being ready for taxi...
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Write your own, just make sure it includes whatever is on the usually crappy manufacturer checklist as a butt covering exercise.
I created a universal checklist for our Cessna and Warrior.
Everything including emergencies covered on two sided A4, folded along it's length.
I created a universal checklist for our Cessna and Warrior.
Everything including emergencies covered on two sided A4, folded along it's length.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the answers.
That's what I tough. Maybe someone told that because he was too lazy too do it or it's one of the new rules the belgian CAA has created.....
I'll create our own checklist with all the required items.
That's what I tough. Maybe someone told that because he was too lazy too do it or it's one of the new rules the belgian CAA has created.....
I'll create our own checklist with all the required items.
Join Date: May 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes Part-NCO which came into force in the UK on 25/8/16
AMC1 NCO.GEN.105(c) Pilot-in-command responsibilities and authority
CHECKLISTS
(a) The pilot-in-command should use the latest checklists provided by the manufacturer.
(b) If checks conducted prior to take-off are suspended at any point, the pilot-in-command should re-start them from a safe point prior to the interruption.
AMC1 NCO.GEN.105(c) Pilot-in-command responsibilities and authority
CHECKLISTS
(a) The pilot-in-command should use the latest checklists provided by the manufacturer.
(b) If checks conducted prior to take-off are suspended at any point, the pilot-in-command should re-start them from a safe point prior to the interruption.
...'should', not 'must'.
AMCs may be 'soft' law but they're still the law, for now.
The reality of that however, is yes, you can use a locally generated checklist - but it MUST contain the minimum requirements of the manufacturer's checklist. You can change formats and add additional material all you wish.
G
G
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry Genghis, I don't agree with that statement entirely. There are plenty of operators who have their own checklists that do not follow the manufacturers. What exactly are the minimum requirements of a checklist? Its either the manufacturers normal procedures or it isn't.
Under EASA, "expect" and"should" is used to indicate a strong obligation.
"May" is used to indicate discretion.
"Shall" and "must" are used to indicate a mandatory requirement.
AD
Under EASA, "expect" and"should" is used to indicate a strong obligation.
"May" is used to indicate discretion.
"Shall" and "must" are used to indicate a mandatory requirement.
AD
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: London
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not quite how EU regulation works. If there is only one published Acceptable Means of Compliance with a regulatory requirement then it is the only way that you can comply. You could always submit an Alternative Means of Compliance to the competent authority if you wish to comply in another way (good luck with that).
AMCs may be 'soft' law but they're still the law, for now.
AMCs may be 'soft' law but they're still the law, for now.
This is in marked contrast to for example part ARO (ARO.GEN.120), the equivalent for commercial ops, which specifies that AMCs need to be approved by the competent authority.
A non-commercial operator of complex aircraft (Part-NCC) can use home-brew AMCs, but has to declare these to the competent authority - this is in part ORO.GEN.120 and ORO.DEC.100, not in Part-NCC, strangely enough.
So in summary - under which circumstances AMCs need to be notified and/or approved, and by whom, depends on the exact regulation. In most cases they need approval; especially AMCs in Part-FCL can only be made by the competent authority and have to be approved by EASA, IIRC.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: London
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So just to make this relevant to the thread:
Own checklists would be an AMC.
Part-NCO - Cook your own checklist. It's your funeral, after all...
Part-NCC - Cook your own checklist and send it to the authority.
Part-ARO - Cook your own checklist and get it approved by the authority.
Own checklists would be an AMC.
Part-NCO - Cook your own checklist. It's your funeral, after all...
Part-NCC - Cook your own checklist and send it to the authority.
Part-ARO - Cook your own checklist and get it approved by the authority.
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Hogwarts
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Almost cobalt:
Part-NCO - Cook your own checklist, if anything happens, the CAA might ask you some questions.
Part-NCC - Cook your own checklist, and declare that you're happy with it to the authority, under a self-declaration. If anything happens, your so called "SMS" should take care of it, otherwise the CAA might take a look, and ask you questions.
Part-ARO - Cook your own checklist, and send it to the authority to get it approved. "SMS" and management should deal with anything that arises, otherwise the CAA ask questions based on audits.
Part-NCO - Cook your own checklist, if anything happens, the CAA might ask you some questions.
Part-NCC - Cook your own checklist, and declare that you're happy with it to the authority, under a self-declaration. If anything happens, your so called "SMS" should take care of it, otherwise the CAA might take a look, and ask you questions.
Part-ARO - Cook your own checklist, and send it to the authority to get it approved. "SMS" and management should deal with anything that arises, otherwise the CAA ask questions based on audits.