PPL question about CG
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: South West UK
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very broadly, as the CG moves aft the aeroplane becomes less stable in the pitching plane. As you go aft of the CG limit the aeroplane will be come more and more "pitchy" then, at some point (possibly not very far aft of the limit) it will become uncontrollable. With a forward CG it will become more strongly stable, this will reduce its controlability!
So, the short answer, yes, there will be an effect. The advice - don't try this at home!! Really, DO NOT TRY THIS AT HOME!!
Happy landings
3 Point
So, the short answer, yes, there will be an effect. The advice - don't try this at home!! Really, DO NOT TRY THIS AT HOME!!
Happy landings
3 Point
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tamworth, UK / Nairobi, Kenya
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's true whether or not in a steep turn.
The question is with respect to a steep turn.
But rather than give the answer, I suggest thinking this through, what happens in a steep turn that could have any bearing on how the aeroplane handles with different CG positions?
The question is with respect to a steep turn.
But rather than give the answer, I suggest thinking this through, what happens in a steep turn that could have any bearing on how the aeroplane handles with different CG positions?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Okay, i think we can put it this way..
- if the CG is aft of the limits, the full deflection of the elevator would not be enough to recover from a steep rurn.
and
- if the CG is fwd of the limits, the full deflection of all control would not be enough to recover from a steep rurn.
or its the other way around.
- if the CG is aft of the limits, the full deflection of the elevator would not be enough to recover from a steep rurn.
and
- if the CG is fwd of the limits, the full deflection of all control would not be enough to recover from a steep rurn.
or its the other way around.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The centre of pressure will move forward as the AoA increases when entering a steep turn. The distance between the CoP and CoG will change and this must have some effect on stability.
Hi Sam.
As the C of G is moved further forward, the stick force, and control deflection to maintain altitude in a steep turn, will increase, until it reaches a point where either the force becomes too great for the pilot to maintain, or the elevator reaches the limit of it's travel. In either case, the aircraft will be unable to maintain altitude.
As the C of G is moved further aft, the stick force/deflection will reduce until a point is reached where the aircraft becomes unstable, pitches uncontrollably into the turn, and stalls/spins, a condition from which it may be unable to recover.
As Dobbin mentioned earlier, the C of P moves forward in a steep turn, so there will be a rearward C of G position where the aircraft is marginally stable in level flight, but becomes unstable as a steep turn is entered.
Hope that helps.
MJ
Ps. As 3 point says, Please don't try either of these at home!
As the C of G is moved further forward, the stick force, and control deflection to maintain altitude in a steep turn, will increase, until it reaches a point where either the force becomes too great for the pilot to maintain, or the elevator reaches the limit of it's travel. In either case, the aircraft will be unable to maintain altitude.
As the C of G is moved further aft, the stick force/deflection will reduce until a point is reached where the aircraft becomes unstable, pitches uncontrollably into the turn, and stalls/spins, a condition from which it may be unable to recover.
As Dobbin mentioned earlier, the C of P moves forward in a steep turn, so there will be a rearward C of G position where the aircraft is marginally stable in level flight, but becomes unstable as a steep turn is entered.
Hope that helps.
MJ
Ps. As 3 point says, Please don't try either of these at home!
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tamworth, UK / Nairobi, Kenya
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Everyone jumped in with the answers, I was hoping to try to get Sam to figure out by himself.
In short, the effects of having the CG "out of limits" or even "close" to the limits, are emphasized within a steep turn.
Where you might be able to get the plane to fly when it's "just outside the CG limits", you risk losing control in a turning manoeuvre.
In short, the effects of having the CG "out of limits" or even "close" to the limits, are emphasized within a steep turn.
Where you might be able to get the plane to fly when it's "just outside the CG limits", you risk losing control in a turning manoeuvre.
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As the C of G is moved further aft, the stick force/deflection will reduce
ifitaint...
Indeed, ifitaintboeing! I recall doing an SEP renewal (free of charge - PtoF aeroplane....) in a very nice RV-4. The CG was probably quite aft with 2 PoB and while the aeroplane had nicely responsive controls, trying to fly it accurately for any length of time wasn't all that easy due to rather limited pitch stability. So for flying in IMC it would be rather tiring, I would imagine.
I'm told the early Spitfires were rather like that too.
Good to have seen you last night!
I'm told the early Spitfires were rather like that too.
Good to have seen you last night!