Licensing again!
Thread Starter
Licensing again!
I have a JAR PPL/IR deemed to be an EASA licence until expiring in 2016.
I believed that I can fly EASA and Non EASA Annex II aircraft with these qualifications. CAA ruling. I assume any aircraft not deemed EASA is covered, Permit, and ex military types, as by definition they are deemed as Non EASA.
In the past year I have flown EASA and various other types, Chipmunk, Tiger Moth, various RVs. Alpi 300.
As it's an EASA licence I've also flown to various EASA countries, it's a Euopean licence.
A colleague now tells me I should have had an LAPL national licence to cover non EASA types as my JAR deemed EASA does not apply.
Is this correct?
I believed that I can fly EASA and Non EASA Annex II aircraft with these qualifications. CAA ruling. I assume any aircraft not deemed EASA is covered, Permit, and ex military types, as by definition they are deemed as Non EASA.
In the past year I have flown EASA and various other types, Chipmunk, Tiger Moth, various RVs. Alpi 300.
As it's an EASA licence I've also flown to various EASA countries, it's a Euopean licence.
A colleague now tells me I should have had an LAPL national licence to cover non EASA types as my JAR deemed EASA does not apply.
Is this correct?
Last edited by cessnapete; 15th Feb 2015 at 21:40.
Is this correct?
Different National Authorities within EASA have made different arrangements for their non-EASA (Annex II)aircraft. In the UK, The CAA have deemed an EASA Licence to be valid to fly Uk registered Annex II aircraft.
As your JAA PPL Is deemed by EASA to be an EASA licence until you renew it as an EASA one, it is also deemed valid, by the UK CAA, to fly UK registered Annex II aircraft.
MJ
Last edited by Mach Jump; 16th Feb 2015 at 09:28. Reason: Last two paragraphs added.
I should have had an LAPL national licence
