PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Flying Instructors & Examiners
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 31st May 2012, 10:19   #21 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,887
Quote:
We also that a suitably qualified CRE(A) should be empowered to conduct proficiency checks
Surely, a CRE/IRR is actually the "IRE" referred to in the NPA. Virtually all SP IRs are currently revalidated by CREs
Quote:
FCL.1005.CRE CRE — Privileges
The privileges of a CRE are to conduct, for single-pilot aeroplanes, except for single-pilot high performance complex aeroplanes:
(a) skill tests for the issue of class and type ratings;
(b) proficiency checks for:
(1) revalidation or renewal of class and type ratings;
(2) revalidation and renewal of IRs, provided that the CRE complies with the requirements in FCL.1010.IRE(a).
With all the associated costs!
Whopity is offline   Reply
Old 31st May 2012, 16:50   #22 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 20,213
Our proposal is that a CRE conducting EIR revalidations/renewals would need to meet simpler requirements than those specified in FCL.1010.IRE(a).

The requirement for the CRE to have 2000 hrs flight time is wholly disproportionate for merely assessing EIR proficiency checks.
BEagle is online now   Reply
Old 31st May 2012, 17:21   #23 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 229
Quote:
AOPA(UK) considers that the limited IFR privileges of the EIR can be adequately assessed by an FE(A) who holds an IRI(A) certificate and do not require specific assessment by an IRE(A).
The problem with the EIR is that you cannot instruct/examine for a rating which you don't hold. There are a lot of instructors using IMC privileges, without the need for a IR (SPA).

I agree that these privileges should be contained within the FE (A). However, a FE (A) with a IR (R) / IMC will not hold the privileges to instruct/examine for the EIR in any case - they will need either a IR (SPA) or a EIR themselves (!).

ifitaint...
ifitaintboeing is offline   Reply
Old 31st May 2012, 19:37   #24 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 20,213
Correct - the CRE proposal refers to the EIR and has no connection with national proposals for IR(R) instructors / examiners, which are presently sub rosa. We are not proposing that an FE/CRE/TRE who holds no instrument qualification other than the IMC Rating / IR(R) should be able to conduct EIR proficiency checks.

The IR includes all EIR privileges, so a CRE with a full IRI certificate would indeed hold the relevant qualifications.

Last edited by BEagle; 31st May 2012 at 19:37.
BEagle is online now   Reply
Old 31st May 2012, 20:44   #25 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: euroga.org
Posts: 2,471
Not that I have a particular axe to grind on this one but one thing which the original proposers of the CBM IR were keen to maintain was the final skills test being to the same standard as the existing ICAO IR IRT.

This was to avoid creating a "second class IR" which would then be denied access to e.g. certain airspace classes.

OTOH, the CBM IR will surely become the default IR path for ATPL cadets, so doesn't that make the "CAAFU IRT" skills test redundant anyway?
peterh337 is offline   Reply
Old 6th Jun 2012, 21:57   #26 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: manchester uk
Posts: 3
17 Sept for IMC applications

Hi guys, can anyone confirm the last date for applications for the issue of the IMC rating. I cannot find the 17Sept as the final date in any docs.
AVRO13 is offline   Reply
Old 6th Jun 2012, 22:24   #27 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Up North
Age: 46
Posts: 481
There probably isn't one, if we count the IR(R) and IMCr as the same thing, or if there is it's 8th April 2014.
See here:
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/2330/Revis...2012%20_v3.pdf
and here, page 27:
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/2330/Trans...0Change_v3.pdf
mrmum is offline   Reply
Old 7th Jun 2012, 08:03   #28 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 20,213
Who on earth are 'CAAFU'?
BEagle is online now   Reply
Old 7th Jun 2012, 08:25   #29 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 274
CAAFU was the name of the old CAA flying Unit at Stansted who would conduct IR tests on their HS125s (later on a sim) IRE/TRE candidates used to do their upgrade course with them before that all moved in-house with the individual airlines.
Meikleour is offline   Reply
Old 7th Jun 2012, 10:22   #30 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,887
CAAFU ceased to exist in the early 90s!
Whopity is offline   Reply
Old 7th Jun 2012, 11:57   #31 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 274
Oh dear! Now I am showing my age.....................
Meikleour is offline   Reply
Old 8th Jun 2012, 15:44   #32 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,495
Quote:
Who on earth are 'CAAFU'?
Point taken of course, but for those who don't know of CAFU, some wonderful photos here.
bookworm is offline   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 20:26.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".