PPRuNe Forums

Go Back   PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Flying Instructors & Examiners
Forgotten your Username/Password?


Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 1st May 2012, 13:27   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: South Africa
Posts: 7
Using 2 VHF comms on same frequency

I was once told that if you have two VHF radios installed, you should not have them both set to the same frequency as it would be 'unhealthy' for the radio unit itself.
While it makes little sense anyway to have both your radios on the same frequency, i am wondering if it does anything negative to the radio unit?
we normally teach the students to have a relevant frequency on the number 2 set, and to be able to listen in to that anyway, so its not a critical question, but more out of interest. Does anyone know?
The only thing i can think of is that if you have them both set to the same frequency, as you transmit on comm 1, the comm 2 will be receiving that transmission, and maybe somehow that grables the transmission? Any ideas?

Thanks!
Obes is offline   Reply
Old 1st May 2012, 14:14   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North West
Posts: 170
Depending on the proximity and arrangement of the antenna system, you will be exposing the 2nd receiver to very high signal strengths when you transmit on the other radio. There is some potential to damge sensitive components in the receiver circuitry.
horsebox is offline   Reply
Old 1st May 2012, 14:22   #3 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: South Africa
Posts: 7
That makes sense. Thanks.
Obes is offline   Reply
Old 1st May 2012, 20:18   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,867
The biggest problem when operating two radios on the same frequency, is feedback, signal from one receiver finding its way to the transmitter completing the loop. A receiver is designed to work alongside the transmitter, they are both in the same box separated only by a pair of relay contacts, so there is little danger of damaging the receiver. In the early days of transistorised receivers some problems were encountered, but that was a long time ago and any receiver should be capable of being operated in close proximity to a transmitter without any problems.
Whopity is offline   Reply
Old 11th May 2012, 16:49   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 4,703
Breakthrough is always a problem with two radios whatever the frequency selected as because of the size of light aircraft the antennas are always near each other.

Some radio manufacturers fit a TX interlock to reduce the breakthrough, this system turns up the squelch on the box that is not transmitting by pulling a pin to ground on the non transmitting box by using the mike key line on the transmitting box.
A and C is offline   Reply
Old 14th May 2012, 01:04   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 44
The susceptibility of a radio to interference from another on a close frequency cannot be avoided when the antennas are close to each other, and it does not make any difference from the RF point of view whether the radios are on the same frequency or an adjacent one. So you will not damage the radio by having them on the same frequency.

As someone else said, the real problem is audio feedback which would destroy the intelligibility, as well as confusing the speaker!

Received signals can be 'de-sensitised' by the presence of a close transmitter on an adjacent frequency, so you cannot reliably listen to another channel when you are transmitting. The degree of desense depends on the frequency separation as well as other factors such as mixing products in the radio.

Commercial land mobile base stations and repeaters that have to transmit and receive at the same time use cavity filters to get rid of desense in multi-frequency installations, which require complex setup by a skilled technician, knowing all the frequencies in use at that station. The lack of space and the fact the the frequencies are constantly changing makes the use of cavities in an aircraft impossible.
ve3id is offline   Reply
Old 25th May 2012, 21:43   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Up North
Age: 46
Posts: 481
DME/Transponder interference

On a similar vein, does anyone know if it's possible/likely for a transponder to affect a DME? From what I understand the SSR frequency band is 1030/1090 MHz, which lies within the range used by DME. From experience, I've noted that the DME "drops out" mostly when the transponder is in use, more so on some particular DME channels, maybe even depending on the SSR code selected, but I'm not sure about that.
If it could be one affecting the other, is it down to the location of the boxes, or the antennae, or the wiring loom, or (lack of) shielding perhaps.
mrmum is offline   Reply
Old 25th May 2012, 22:08   #8 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,867
Yes it is possible. Normally the antennas and equipment are sited so that there are no problems of incompatibility however; as equipment ages and corrosion sets in, a poor earth connection can give rise to problems. A DC earth is quite different to an RF earth at UHF.

Last edited by Whopity; 25th May 2012 at 22:09.
Whopity is offline   Reply
Old 25th May 2012, 22:55   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Too close to EASA
Posts: 336
Many DMEs and Transponders are interconnected with a mutual suppression bus to prevent interaction. It's also particularly important to have the transponder and TCAS connected together in this way or the TCAS sees it's own aircraft transponder as a threat!
wigglyamp is online now   Reply
 
 
This ad will disappear if you login
Reply
 


Thread Tools


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 21:38.


vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1
© 1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

As these are anonymous forums the origins of the contributions may be opposite to what may be apparent. In fact the press may use it, or the unscrupulous, or sciolists*, to elicit certain reactions.

*"sciolist"... Noun, archaic. "a person who pretends to be knowledgeable and well informed".