Loss of revenue with the loss of the IMC
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: York
Age: 53
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Loss of revenue with the loss of the IMC
Ok so come April the registered facility will not be able to offer IMC training.
What about the EIR & IR when will this come online? And when will the requirements to teach it be finalised.
At present all I can see is a loss of revenue.
What about the EIR & IR when will this come online? And when will the requirements to teach it be finalised.
At present all I can see is a loss of revenue.
Ok so come April the registered facility will not be able to offer IMC training.
Please see Future of the UK IMC Rating
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also this, question 25
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/620/20110902FAQsv3.pdf
No clear position has yet been put forward, so it's still business as usual for the IMC rating, if not an increased revenue of pilots wanting to get it in before april just in case the rules do all change over night.
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/620/20110902FAQsv3.pdf
No clear position has yet been put forward, so it's still business as usual for the IMC rating, if not an increased revenue of pilots wanting to get it in before april just in case the rules do all change over night.
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Up North
Age: 57
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's looking a little bit on the pessimistic side isn't it? It isn't cast in stone yet what's actually going to happen with the IMCr come April is it?
Even if the worst case scenario prevails and we all become ATO's, but can't do any more new IMCr's or renew existing ones, I don't think there's anything to stop us teaching the skills to PPL's is there? The PPL syllabus is still going to contain Exercise 19, we've still got appropriate aircraft and we as instructors will still have the ratings and qualifications.
We've currently got quite a few students trying to get their PPL and/or IMCr pushed through before April. I've also got one who's said he'd like to do the training after that, even if he can't get the rating.
But that's only going to mitigate the situation slightly, most people won't want to do it if they cant get the rating/use it. I think you're right, it'll cause a significant drop in revenue and utilisation for clubs and instructors. The IMCr was great for giving you something to keep busy with when the weather wasn't good for VFR PPL training. From an instructor point of view, it was also something different to the PPL course, added some more variety to our flying and helped keep it interesting.
Nobody at EASA (or probably even the CAA) will care at all, about any financial troubles they cause for flying schools. How much concern was there from the regulators with the results of part M? How much did that cost you in increased maintenance spend? Mine went up by over 50%, for what improvement in standards or safety - nothing
Does anyone care, no! and it will be exactly the same with the loss of income if we lose the IMCr.
Even if the worst case scenario prevails and we all become ATO's, but can't do any more new IMCr's or renew existing ones, I don't think there's anything to stop us teaching the skills to PPL's is there? The PPL syllabus is still going to contain Exercise 19, we've still got appropriate aircraft and we as instructors will still have the ratings and qualifications.
We've currently got quite a few students trying to get their PPL and/or IMCr pushed through before April. I've also got one who's said he'd like to do the training after that, even if he can't get the rating.
But that's only going to mitigate the situation slightly, most people won't want to do it if they cant get the rating/use it. I think you're right, it'll cause a significant drop in revenue and utilisation for clubs and instructors. The IMCr was great for giving you something to keep busy with when the weather wasn't good for VFR PPL training. From an instructor point of view, it was also something different to the PPL course, added some more variety to our flying and helped keep it interesting.
Nobody at EASA (or probably even the CAA) will care at all, about any financial troubles they cause for flying schools. How much concern was there from the regulators with the results of part M? How much did that cost you in increased maintenance spend? Mine went up by over 50%, for what improvement in standards or safety - nothing
Does anyone care, no! and it will be exactly the same with the loss of income if we lose the IMCr.
